@BrooksFallis "Learn to live with" just means "live with".
If not, show what effort is being undertaken and what metrics are set for the "learn to" part.

@BrooksFallis“学会与人共处”的意思就是“与人共处”。
如果没有，说明正在进行哪些工作，以及为“学会”部分设置了哪些标准。

@JT_Grindrod @AGoldsmithEsq @POTUS He absolutely didn't mean that at the time.

@JT_Grindrod@AGoldsmithEsq@POTUS他当时绝对不是这个意思。

@malar0ne I think there is a general low tax aspect to it as well, and that may ultimately be at the root even more so than anti-regulation.
More activist policies usually require spending money = eventually more taxes.

@malar0ne我认为它也有一个普遍的低税收方面，这可能最终是根源，甚至比反监管更重要。
更积极的政策通常需要花钱，最终需要更多的税收。

@Alagai @mgubrud @malar0ne Yes, a lot of it is keyword driven and sometimes the replies are canned and don't even coherently respond to what triggered the keyword.

@Alagai@mgubrud@malar0ne是的，很多都是由关键字驱动的，有时回复是固定的，甚至没有连贯地响应触发关键字的内容。

@mgubrud @malar0ne Try commenting about zero covid strategies. Bots abolutely HATE that more than anything.
Yes the bots are paid for. They're not really people, which is why they are called bots. The accounts may be literally run by a person, but it's a person being paid and managed to do a job.

@mgubrud@malar0ne尝试评论零新冠病毒策略。机器人最讨厌这个。
是的，机器人是付费的。他们不是真正的人，这就是为什么他们被称为机器人。这些账户实际上可能是由一个人管理的，但这是一个人获得报酬并管理工作。

@jimsciutto What time period?

@jimsciutto什么时间段？

@mctd_support @MelpomeneMel Not only, there are also Mercer, DeVos, etc. Atlas Network (backed by some or all of them and coordinating many of their front groups) pops up repeatedly too.

@mctd_support@MelpomeneMel不仅如此，还有美世、德沃斯等公司。Atlas网络（由部分或全部公司支持，并协调其许多前线团队）也会反复出现。

@LazarusLong13 Just kind of expected to see a pic of boxes of masks, not that! But I get it.

@LazarusLong13只是希望看到一盒口罩的照片，不是那样！但我明白了。

@msimonson19 @greg_travis @JHowardBrainMD @EWoodhouse7 @Loretta_Torrago We do know that. Even places with little covid had big declines in other respiratory diseases and had negative excess mortality. That's the baseline, not zero.

@我们知道这一点。即使是很少感染新冠病毒的地方，其他呼吸道疾病的发病率也大幅下降，死亡率也呈负值。这是基线，不是零。

@PeacefulVegan62 @POTUS Start with implementing his own plan, which mostly doesn't require the right wing to do anything, instead of throwing out most of it and relying only on people getting vaxed (which does, in large part, rely on what RW people do).

@Peace Vegan62@POTUS从实施他自己的计划开始，该计划基本上不要求右翼做任何事情，而不是扔掉大部分计划，只依赖于被激怒的人（这在很大程度上取决于RW人的所作所为）。

@msimonson19 @greg_travis @JHowardBrainMD @EWoodhouse7 @Loretta_Torrago How is this at all complicated? Distancing measures cut flu and rsv (and probably others) to almost zero.
That's not independent of covid, it is exactly because of the measures taken to mitigate covid.

@msimonson19@greg_travis@JHowardBrainMD@EWoodhouse7@Loretta_Torrago这有多复杂？隔离措施将流感和呼吸道合胞病毒（可能还有其他病毒）降至几乎为零。
这并不是独立于新冠病毒，正是因为采取了缓解新冠病毒的措施。

@ar11175007 @j_g_allen Exactly my point.
Also, PPE will never be correctly and consistently effective against a constant unmitigated hazard IN PRACTICE. Humans are human, they slip up, they make mistakes, don't notice flaws in equipment or usage, etc.
Layering is required.

@ar11175007@j_g_allen正是我的观点。
此外，PPE在实践中永远无法正确且持续有效地对抗持续未缓解的危险。人类是人，他们会犯错，不会注意到设备或使用中的缺陷，等等。
需要分层。

@DFisman "Droplet-Plus Precautions"?
Who invented that?
Google trends says the term has basically never been used.

@DFisman“水滴加预防措施”？
谁发明的？
谷歌趋势表示，这个词基本上从未被使用过。

@RickABright @marynmck @WIRED @PPI_Insights @NathanGrubaugh @ArisKatzourakis @sarahcobey Given the lack of durable immunity "running out of hosts to infect" is not even a realistic starting point.

@RickABright@marynmck@WIRED@PPI_Insights@NathanGrubaugh@ArisKatzourakis@sarahcobey考虑到缺乏持久的免疫力，“没有宿主感染”甚至不是一个现实的起点。

@LazarusLong13 How does this fit with the picture. Are we back to making masks out of shirts?

@LazarusLong13这与图片有什么关系。我们又开始用衬衫做面具了吗？

@AGoldsmithEsq @POTUS https://twitter.com/business/s...

@AGoldsmithEsq@POTUShttps://twitter.com/business/s...

@DrLeanaWen @peterdaou Good, do all those things FIRST, demonstrate that they are well-implemented and effective, and THEN remove existing very limited safety measures.

@DrLeanaWen@peterdaou很好，首先做所有这些事情，证明它们得到了很好的实施和有效，然后删除现有的非常有限的安全措施。

@POTUS Good try to pivot from the health issue you promised to end but didn't.

@POTUS Good尝试从你承诺要结束但没有结束的健康问题开始。

@PeterArcher37 @angie_rasmussen Sick pay offends those who are very much against treating workers better. Funding anything (including ventilation) offends those who are against government spending.

@Peteracher37@angie_rasmussen病假工资冒犯了那些非常反对更好地对待员工的人。资助任何东西（包括通风）都会冒犯那些反对政府开支的人。

@angie_rasmussen @perdidostschool 🎯
Suggesting one season of reprieve is literally planning to fail.

@angie_rasmussen@perdidostschool🎯
暗示一季缓刑实际上是在计划失败。