Aeon 的最新消息

@ar11175007 @j_g_allen He never acknowledges that source control is elimination and administrative i.e. higher on the hierarchy than "one way masking" PPE, and are essential layering to have any chance of maintaining protection over extended workplace/school/life exposure.

@ar11175007@j_g_allen他从不承认源代码控制是消除和管理的,即比“单向屏蔽”PPE在层次结构上更高,并且是必要的分层,以便有机会在长期的工作场所/学校/生活暴露下保持保护。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mctd_support @MelpomeneMel This true in general but it's also because hostility to covid measures is consistently astroturfed and amplified by big money.

@mctd_support@MelpomeneMel这在总体上是正确的,但这也是因为对新冠病毒措施的敌意一直被大把金钱所煽动和放大。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LauraMiner100 @LinguardSage @luckytran @oni_blackstock Most of those are vented in some way. You need firefighting or swim goggles (probably some other categories are unvented, but I don't know what they are).

@LauraMiner100@LinguardSage@luckytran@oni_blackstock大多数都以某种方式通风。你需要消防或游泳护目镜(可能还有其他类别的护目镜没有排气,但我不知道它们是什么)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@nohomelikeplace @BNODesk Partial list from last year. I now there have been adjustments up and down along the way but I don't know the details beyond things like the graph:
https://twitter.com/zorinaq/st... https://t.co/5sQ2LBSjfi

@paralamision @_Kodos_ "BuT sWeDeN hAd No LoCkDoWn"
67% of Swedes worked from home Mar-Sep 2020
they banned public events > 50 people
they closed schools
they had a travel ban from non-EU countries
they implemented "family isolation"
they mandated shops & restaurants to avoid crowding
etc

发表时间:4年前 作者:Marc Bevand @zorinaq

@去年的nohomelikeplace@BNODesk部分列表。我现在知道,在这个过程中有上下调整,但我不知道图表以外的细节:
https://twitter.com/zorinaq/st... https://t.co/5sQ2LBSjfi

@paralamision(paralamision)科多斯(Kodos)"但瑞典没有封锁"
2020年3月至9月,67%的瑞典人在家工作
他们禁止公共活动>;50人
他们关闭了学校
他们有来自非欧盟国家的旅行禁令
他们实行“家庭隔离”
他们授权商店和;餐馆避免拥挤

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@nohomelikeplace @BNODesk Better coverage of what specifically?

@nohomelikeplace@BNODesk更好地报道了什么?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@nohomelikeplace @BNODesk Fancy way of saying a lie.

@nohomelikeplace@BNODesk说谎的方式很别致。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@itosettiMD_MBA That's long since already happened.

@这已经是很久以前的事了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@nohomelikeplace @BNODesk It always did. Sweden not having any restrictions or "lockdowns" was always a lie.

@nohomelikeplace@BNODesk总是这样。瑞典没有任何限制或“封锁”总是一个谎言。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl It's odd that tests can be ordered on a web site and delivered (albeit still over weeks) but masks can't.

@wsbgnl奇怪的是,测试可以在网站上订购并交付(尽管仍需数周),但口罩不能。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Gab_H_R @RomainMartinIO Summer break over

@Gab_H_R@RomainMartinIO暑期度假

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NickytaLeb @APazyryk We're at the stage where doing anything different raises inconvenient questions about why it wasn't done earlier.

@NickytaLeb@APazyryk我们正处于这样一个阶段:做任何不同的事情都会引发一些令人不安的问题,比如为什么不早点做。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ColinDotNet @askellyphd It's not, the entire claim is nonsense gaslighting.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DrLeanaWen Public opinion has not changed. People want more mitigations and a more robust policy response, including mask mandates, not less.
The let-it-rip approach is something that is being pushed on the public, and not at all demanded by the public.
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@ColinDotNet@askellyphd不是,整个说法都是胡说八道。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@莱纳文博士的公众意见没有改变。人们想要更多的缓解措施和更有力的政策回应,包括口罩授权,而不是更少。
“任其自然”的做法是强加给公众的,而不是公众所要求的。
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 There is no way that account can have <900 followers. Something is wrong with the universe.

@LazarusLong13账户不可能拥有<;900名追随者。宇宙出了问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ASlavitt Why not go ahead and authorize for <2?
What is the purpose or benefit of forcing qualitatively different data into a single group.

@ASlavitt为什么不继续授权<;2.
将质量不同的数据强制纳入一个组的目的或好处是什么。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@snorman1776 @mpp75214 @No3spera @BNODesk Again, this is an outlier. Don't obsess.

@snorman1776@mpp75214@No3spera@BNODesk同样,这是一个异常值。别痴迷了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mpp75214 @snorman1776 @No3spera @BNODesk We haven't seen one in a long time (combination of virulence and spread)
Now with immunity and attenuation of the virus (though this is N=1, with previous variants becoming more virulent) it may approach more common pathogens in impact, but not there yet.

@mpp75214@snorman1776@No3spera@BNODesk我们已经很久没见过了(结合了毒力和传播)
现在随着病毒的免疫力和衰减(尽管这是N=1,之前的变种变得更具毒性),它可能会接近更常见的病原体,但目前还没有。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DougSalzmann @LazarusLong13 Good point. There could be multiple effects.

@DougSalzmann@LazarusLong13很好。可能有多种影响。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 Interesting this seems to suggest more transmission at higher humidity. I think there have been some suggestions of the opposite.

@LazarusLong13有趣的是,这似乎表明在较高湿度下传播更多。我认为有一些相反的建议。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RidleyDM @DrLeanaWen I've even noticed color effects, where in some areas people wear lot of surgical masks but in certain neighborhoods you see a lot more black ones rather than the standard blue.

@RidleyDM@DrLeanaWen我甚至注意到了颜色效应,在一些地区人们戴很多外科口罩,但在某些社区,你会看到更多的黑色口罩,而不是标准的蓝色口罩。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RidleyDM @DrLeanaWen There doesn't seem to be much to explain it (for example, if local officials were pushing people to upgrade or providing better masks or such, but I don't think any of that is true in general). It's just a mystery of human behavior.

@RidleyDM@DrLeanaWen似乎没有太多的解释(例如,如果地方官员正在推动人们升级或提供更好的口罩之类的,但我不认为所有这些都是正确的)。这只是人类行为的一个谜。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情