Aeon 的最新消息

@kenser80 @manyJennys @danielkotzin Most places that have vax requirements for restaurants it apples to employees as well. There could be exceptions.

@kenser80@manyJennys@danielkotz在大多数对餐厅有vax要求的地方,它也适用于员工。可能会有例外。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@manyJennys @kenser80 @danielkotzin I said usually and if it is a province-wide requirement then I'm guessing the province has pretty high vax rate and most people are fine with it.

@manyJennys@kenser80@danielkotzin我通常说,如果这是全省范围内的要求,那么我猜该省的vax发病率相当高,大多数人对此没有意见。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@notdred Does the 50% "requirement" have any stipulation as to confidence interval, because that's WAY below 50% in this case.

@对于置信区间,50%的“要求”没有任何规定,因为在这种情况下,这远远低于50%。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheDavidInsley @danielkotzin Many places restaurants do have to post their health inspections.

@在许多地方,Davidinsley@Danielkotz餐厅必须张贴健康检查。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@manyJennys @kenser80 @danielkotzin There is nothing significant about it. The places that actually have these mandates usually have extremely high vax rates and it is mostly people who don't live there criticizing it, not locals.

@许多Jennys@kenser80@danielkotzin,这没有什么意义。实际上有这些规定的地方通常有极高的vax率,大多数不住在那里的人都在批评它,而不是当地人。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ChrisHubbard @offdutykat @danielkotzin It's still true with Omicron to a lesser degree, particularly when even if not required, vaxed people may also be boosted.

@ChrisHubbard@offdutykat@danielkotzin Omicron在较小程度上仍然适用,尤其是在不需要的情况下,vax人群也可能会得到提振。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AnthonyTheNP People do.

@AnthonyTheNP人是这样的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@_BringBackPluto @wsbgnl I don't think they're actually "thinking" that, but they are trying to define their responsibility in the narrowest possible way.

@_BringBackPluto@wsbgnl我不认为他们真的在“思考”,但他们正试图以尽可能狭窄的方式定义自己的责任。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@theoy991 @thereal_truther @marvin_nz I'm not positive but I think fully vaccinated = 3 or recent enough 2, anything less is partial.

@theoy991@thereal_truther@marvin_nz我不是阳性,但我认为完全接种=3或最近足够2,任何较少的都是部分的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FrancescoLugli @JeremyDFHinman @DavidSacks Real GDP is already adjusted for inflation.

@FrancescoLugli@JeremyDFHinman@DavidSacks的实际GDP已经根据通货膨胀进行了调整。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@texasmedicine1 @musicquestmike @BNODesk It's from here, which has the ratios, generally around 1.5x-3x
https://www.frontiersin.org/ar...

@texasmedicine1@musicquestmike@BNODesk来自这里,其比率通常在1.5x-3x左右
https://www.frontiersin.org/ar...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Lachlan59740341 @PenGwenart @thedavidcrosby Correct
https://edm.com/industry/spoti... https://t.co/SZguz1YuOa

@Lachlan 59740341@PenGwenart@thedavidcrossby更正
https://edm.com/industry/spoti...对不起,对不起。https://t.co/SZguz1YuOa

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@politicaljunkd1 @JamesSurowiecki How many paid exclusives does spotify have?
If you can pay $100 million for some content you can pay for a few fact checkers for that particular content.

@politicaljunkd1@JamesSurowiecki spotify有多少付费独家服务?
如果你能为某些内容支付1亿美元,你可以为特定内容支付一些事实核查。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ElevatdElephant @RafaelC59647238 @Afca_JC14 @BNODesk Both matter. Impact = number of cases times severity per case. This is much much higher than flu over any time period by any measure.

@LevatdDephant@RafaelC59647238@Afca_JC14@bNodek这两个问题都很重要。影响=病例数乘以每个病例的严重程度。无论以何种标准衡量,这都远高于任何时期的流感。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@texasmedicine1 @musicquestmike @BNODesk Four major variants more severe, one less severe, hardly a clear trajectory. https://t.co/fTyXstWjIN

@texasmedicine1@musicquestmike@BNODesk四个主要变种更严重,一个不那么严重,几乎没有清晰的轨迹。https://t.co/fTyXstWjIN

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LauraMiner100 @LinguardSage @luckytran @oni_blackstock (or a full face respirator)

@LauraMiner100@LinguardSage@luckytran@oni_blackstock(或全脸呼吸器)

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@erikaherzog @phealthsean @jfeldman_epi Third shot.

@erikaherzog@phealthsean@jfeldman_epi第三枪。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelmina_lab @eMedCertified eMed is a great concept but what would be wrong with at least having a pathway for people to self report test results and access resources?
I guess I must be stupid because I can't see the reason for not having it.

@michaelmina_lab@eMedCertified eMed是一个很好的概念,但至少有一条途径让人们自我报告测试结果并获取资源,这有什么错呢?
我想我一定很愚蠢,因为我看不出没有它的原因。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JevensenJevy @fitterhappierAJ https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DataDrivenMD Not a good idea to leave room for a novel virus to explore vast genetic dimensionality.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@JevensenJevy@fitterhappierAJhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DataDrivenMD并不是一个好主意,它不能为一种新病毒探索广阔的基因维度留下空间。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AndrewNoymer Narrator: ...
Okay you know, I'm not going to say it.

@AndrewNoymer旁白:。。。
好吧,我不会说的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情