@Nutmeg031992 @LongDesertTrain I dunno, I see a lot of people wearing them indoors, even in places without a mandate, depending on conditions (during surges). In cities with mandates isn't nearly everyone. I guess it depends where.

@肉豆蔻031992@LongDesertTrain我不知道，我看到很多人在室内穿着它们，甚至在没有授权的地方，这取决于条件（在浪涌期间）。在有授权的城市，并不是所有人都是这样。我想这取决于在哪里。

@LongDesertTrain @Nutmeg031992 I think there are a few who don't support mandates but don't oppose wearing a mask in at least some situations. It's a rational position to see that it as overly authoritarian. But I agree it's mostly overlap.

@LongDesertTrain@Nutmag031992我认为有一些人不支持授权，但至少在某些情况下不反对戴口罩。将其视为过度专制是一种理性的立场。但我同意这主要是重叠。

@Nutmeg031992 @LongDesertTrain No it doesn't. Check the IHME composite on that. It DID show majorities wearing masks back in early 2021, but not really since then. It's 45% now and I don't think they require "always", but not sure.

@肉豆蔻031992@LongDesertTrain不，没有。检查一下上面的IHME合成物。从2021年初开始，大多数人戴着面具，但从那时起并不是真的。现在是45%，我认为他们不需要“总是”，但不确定。

@Nutmeg031992 @LongDesertTrain From there you may have some who think mask wearing is okay in some situations but don't want a mandate. And then a smaller group who is just flat out against anything mask.

@肉豆蔻031992@LongDesertTrain从那里你可能会有一些人认为戴口罩在某些情况下是可以的，但不想得到授权。然后是一小群人，他们只是全力以赴对抗任何面具。

@Nutmeg031992 @LongDesertTrain It's not. The polling is *really* consistent at about 70% in favor of mandates, particularly at least when needed during surges. In most urban areas it's quite a bit higher.

@肉豆蔻031992@Longstertrain不是。民意调查结果显示，70%左右的人支持强制执行，尤其是在激增期间需要的时候。在大多数城市地区，这个数字要高得多。

@LongDesertTrain @Nutmeg031992 Sure, but that doesn't help get things done. If you want to negotiate compromise you have to get the politicians to agree, unless you are talking about a (likely) generational effort to try to shift the party leaders.

@LongDesertTrain@Nutmag031992当然，但这无助于完成任务。如果你想通过谈判达成妥协，你必须让政客们同意，除非你说的是（可能的）一代人努力试图改变党的领导人。

@LongDesertTrain @Nutmeg031992 That's probably around 25%, potentially a bit smaller, though unclear and hard to measure. Yes it is much higher (sometimes approaching 100%) in rural areas. Most people don't live in rural areas. But of course US politics overweights rural areas too.

@LongDesertTrain@Nutmag031992，可能约为25%，可能稍小一些，但不清楚且难以测量。是的，在农村地区这一比例要高得多（有时接近100%）。大多数人不住在农村地区。但当然，美国政治也过于重视农村地区。

@Nutmeg031992 @LongDesertTrain So if you want to negotiate political compromise, I can see wanting to look elsewhere. But at the same time I don't see a realistic path to negotiating a compromise IAQ either. The $ for schools, which was poorly implemented at the local level anyway, only passed on party line.

@肉豆蔻031992@LongDesertTrain所以如果你想通过谈判达成政治妥协，我可以看出你想去别处看看。但与此同时，我也看不到一条现实的途径来协商一个折衷的室内空气质量。给学校的美元只在党的路线上通过，但在地方一级执行不力。

@Nutmeg031992 @LongDesertTrain Republican politicians and voters overall are pretty mask resistant, even if most of them aren't out protesting and most of the politicians aren't quite as aggressively anti mask as say Rand Paul.

@肉豆蔻031992@LongDesertTrain共和党政客和选民总体上相当抵制戴口罩，即使他们中的大多数人没有出来抗议，而且大多数政客也不像兰德·保罗所说的那样积极反对戴口罩。

@Nutmeg031992 @justthefacts85 @AGoldsmithEsq Thanks, not sure why but the twitter algorithm rarely shows me Topol, who I do follow and have interacted with.

@肉豆蔻031992@justthefacts85@AGoldsmithEsq谢谢，不知道为什么，但twitter算法很少向我展示Topol，我确实关注并与之互动过。

@LongDesertTrain @Nutmeg031992 There is definitely one political party that is consistently anti mask, but that party is also consistently against most business regulations, against spending on public health, often not that supportive of public schools, etc. Not really sure how this observation is useful.

@LongDesertTrain@Nutmag031992肯定有一个政党一贯反对戴口罩，但该政党也一贯反对大多数商业法规，反对公共卫生支出，通常不太支持公立学校，等等。不确定这一观察结果是否有用。

@Nutmeg031992 @justthefacts85 @AGoldsmithEsq Outlier in terms of measuring antibodies from Omicron vs. Delta infection? Are there other studies?

@肉豆蔻031992@justthefact85@AGoldsmithEsq在测量奥米克罗与三角洲感染的抗体方面是否属于异常值？还有其他研究吗？

@Nutmeg031992 @justthefacts85 @AGoldsmithEsq If they're measuring lower antibodies by a factor of 19 that's likely to be significant in terms of reinfections, but it could still be a small number in absolute terms, so I would agree with you that we haven't seen clear data.

@肉豆蔻031992@justthefacts85@AGoldsmithEsq，如果他们测量的抗体降低了19倍，这可能在再感染方面是显著的，但从绝对值来看，它可能仍然是一个小数字，所以我同意你的说法，我们还没有看到明确的数据。

@GardellRickard @NakavuRamesh @RageSheen There's not really a pattern as that reply suggested but there have been five major variants and four were more severe while one was less severe.

@GardellRickard@NakavuRamesh@RageSheen这并不是一个真正的模式，正如那个回答所暗示的，但有五种主要的变异，其中四种更严重，一种不那么严重。

@yaneerbaryam @fitterhappierAJ @zeynep Trouble maker.

@yaneerbaryam@fitterhappierAJ@zeynep麻烦制造者。

@Kathryn78917961 @_ericting That's right.

@凯瑟琳78917961对。

@TrishtheDish_7 @Kathryn78917961 @_ericting It's ultimately up to the supervisors. If you don't like their decision to support her, you need to vote THEM out.

@TrishtheDish_7@Kathryn78917961@_Ericing这最终取决于主管。如果你不喜欢他们支持她的决定，你需要投票让他们退出。

@Kathryn78917961 @_ericting She's appointed by the supervisors. They could remove her and have chosen not to, so in practice and in effect they do support her policies.

@Kathryn78917961@她由主管任命。他们可以罢免她，但选择了不罢免，所以在实践中，实际上他们确实支持她的政策。

@ArouserRebel @_ericting It's only required for large events with over 5000 people. Whether they're "crowded" or not is going to vary but it is pretty hard to have 5000 people in one place where no one is near anyone else.

@只有5000人以上的大型活动才需要。他们是否“拥挤”会有所不同，但在一个没有人靠近其他人的地方，有5000人是相当困难的。

@dh112358 @AbraarKaran They're safety regulations. Every safety regulation (and there are many, in nearly all facets of life and commerce) is a restriction on unsafe behavior.

@dh112358@AbraarKaran这是安全规定。每一项安全法规（在生活和商业的几乎所有方面都有很多）都是对不安全行为的限制。