@annerichardsDRC @michaelmina_lab @eMedCertified Most of the do have a code, it's just not used, and I'm not sure you even need a code to have a pathway to report and access services. Even with a code, people can cheat if they want to, so these are just going to be unverified, but that doesn't have to mean unreported.

@annerichardsDRC@michaelmina_lab@eMedCertified大多数网站都有代码，只是没有使用，我甚至不确定你是否需要代码来报告和访问服务。即使有一个代码，人们也可以作弊，如果他们想的话，所以这些都是未经验证的，但这并不意味着未报告。

@LongDesertTrain There is significant opposition and also logistical barriers from property owners, businesses, school administrators, bureaucracies, budget hawks, anti-regulation, etc. Silly to downplay this.
$100B was budgeted in large part to improve IAQ in schools. Many just didn't.

@长期以来，房地产所有者、企业、学校管理者、官僚机构、预算鹰派、反监管等方面都存在巨大的反对意见和后勤障碍。轻描淡写这一点是愚蠢的。
1000亿美元的预算在很大程度上是为了改善学校的室内空气质量。很多人就是没有。

@wherewereweb4 @chrislhayes @JudahWorldChamp There is enormous push back and structural barriers to IAQ as well. Not realistic to suggest otherwise.
To be clear, I'm supporting it (earlier tweet had a typo and maybe that wasn't clear), but magic bullet thinking is extremely harmful.

@在WereWeb4@chrislhayes@JudahWorldChamp的地方，室内空气质量也面临着巨大的阻力和结构性障碍。提出其他建议并不现实。
明确地说，我支持它（之前的推文有一个拼写错误，可能还不清楚），但魔弹思维是极其有害的。

@Trumpistas @chrislhayes @JudahWorldChamp It's 25% in Germany and 42% in the US. Those are the numbers. Varies by location though.

@特朗普主义者@chrislhayes@JudahWorldChamp在德国和美国分别占25%和42%。这些是数字。不过，位置不同。

@Trumpistas @chrislhayes @JudahWorldChamp There is a 17% difference in adult obesity rate between US and germany. Covid risk for obesity about 2x-3x, so population increase from obesity=1.4x. Germany is 7 years older than the US which increases risk by a factor if 2x or more.
Demographically US has lower overall risk.

@特朗普主义者@chrislhayes@JudahWorldChamp美国和德国成人肥胖率相差17%。新冠病毒导致肥胖的风险约为2-3倍，因此肥胖导致的人口增长=1.4倍。德国比美国大7岁，风险增加一倍甚至更多。
从人口统计学角度来看，美国的总体风险较低。

@wherewereweb4 @chrislhayes @JudahWorldChamp There is no guarantee that "improving" indoor air quality is enough.
By all means, don't stop there, but do stop looking for one magic bullet. Take a comprehensive approach commensurate with the magnitude of the problem.

@wherewereweb4@chrislhayes@JudahWorldChamp不能保证“改善”室内空气质量就足够了。
无论如何，不要就此止步，但一定要停止寻找一颗神奇的子弹。采取与问题的严重程度相称的综合方法。

@myrabatchelder @wsbgnl To this point, where is the outreach, advocacy, and public education? Coming "out with the data" during white house briefings that basically no one watches is not that.
https://twitter.com/JeromeAdam...

@MyraBatcheld@wsbgnl到目前为止，外展、宣传和公共教育在哪里？在白宫简报会上“公布数据”，基本上没人看，这不是事实。
https://twitter.com/JeromeAdam...

@myrabatchelder @wsbgnl Also flooded with bad info

@MyraBatcheld@wsbgnl也充斥着糟糕的信息

@myrabatchelder @crippastor @Elana_Brooklyn Also true. But either way, Dem voters also won't support incumbents if they don't see competence and they don't think things are going in the right direction.

@MyraBatcheld@crippastor@Elana_Brooklyn也是如此。但不管怎样，如果民主党选民看不到执政者的能力，认为事情没有朝着正确的方向发展，他们也不会支持他们。

@JeromeAdamsMD ED pills are a much bigger market, since you need to keep buying them repeatedly (and not just, potentially, 1-2/year for boosters).

@JeromeAdamsMD药片的市场要大得多，因为你需要反复购买它们（而不仅仅是潜在的助推器1-2/年）。

@myrabatchelder @crippastor @Elana_Brooklyn What is politically damaging is that being in a raging pandemic destroys perception of competence and of going in the right direction. People vote on that far more than agree or disagree on any one policy.

@MyraBatcheld@crippastor@Elana_Brooklyn在政治上具有破坏性的是，处于一场肆虐的大流行中会破坏人们对能力和正确方向的看法。人们对这一点的投票远远超过对任何一项政策的同意或不同意。

@myrabatchelder @crippastor @Elana_Brooklyn They're playing to independent ("swing") voters, who aren't as one sided on this (though still support masks mandates by a narrower margin).

@MyraBatcheld@crippastor@Elana_Brooklyn他们是在迎合独立（“摇摆”）选民，他们在这一点上并不是一边倒（尽管仍然以较小的优势支持口罩授权）。

@RASmith2017 It's sometimes part of a cold weather package, particularly on luxury brands

@RASmith2017有时是寒冷天气套餐的一部分，尤其是奢侈品牌

@misguidedsoul7 @ShrikeTron @wsbgnl Agree

@误导7@ShrikeTron@wsbgnl同意

@applepods @myrabatchelder Go back to his original covid plan and implement it, instead of dumping everything in it except giving away money (fueling inflation) and asking people to get vaccinated.

@applepods@MyraBatcheld回到他最初的新冠病毒计划并付诸实施，而不是放弃其中的一切，除了捐钱（加剧通货膨胀）和要求人们接种疫苗。

@Marco_Piani I'm going with the one that has completely unreliable vaccination data and is probably very undervaxed despite numbers to "look" reasonably high.

@Marco_Piani我选择的是一个完全不可靠的疫苗接种数据，尽管数据“看起来”相当高，但它可能被严重低估。

@LongCovidNYC @myrabatchelder Significant probability but this poll result is way off. There are plenty of other places with high spread too.

@LongCovidNYC@MyraBatcheld的概率很高，但这项民意调查结果相差甚远。还有很多其他地方的传播率也很高。

@thereal_truther "shown to have the ability to cause" means what exactly? One unverified submission to VAERS?

@thereal_truther“被证明有能力引起”的确切含义是什么？一份未经验证的提交给VAERS？

@ShrikeTron @misguidedsoul7 @wsbgnl Check the numbers please.

@ShrikeTron@misguidedsoul7@wsbgnl请核对数字。

@ChrisHubbard @offdutykat @danielkotzin Booster is about 50% effective, and may eventually drop to zero but it will take a while. That's where we are now (or less) for most people with boosters. Harder to estimate for two doses because it is closer to zero but still may be 10% or so.

@ChrisHubbard@offdutykat@danielkotzin助推器的有效率约为50%，最终可能降至零，但这需要一段时间。对于大多数有助推器的人来说，这就是我们现在（或更少）的处境。很难估计两次剂量，因为它接近于零，但仍可能是10%左右。