@caro_vina @August_West_GD @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan This is a freaking simple as it could be. The opposite of confusing.
Are you eating or drinking? Take the mask off. Otherwise, keep it on.

@caro_vina@August_West_GD@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan这是一个非常简单的问题。与困惑相反。
你在吃还是在喝？摘下面具。否则，继续。

@caro_vina @August_West_GD @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Don't agree that making ANOTHER exception is LESS confusing or illogical.
The exception is when eating and drinking. This includes restaurants yes, but it also includes taking a sip of water at work, being in an airport or other times when you might need to do so.

@caro_vina@August_West_GD@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan不同意另一个例外不那么令人困惑或不合逻辑。
吃和喝的时候是例外。这包括餐馆是的，但也包括在工作时、在机场或其他需要的时候小口喝水。

@maxam_ross @August_West_GD @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Again, the rule is everywhere indoors except eating and drinking. That makes perfect sense if you want to mitigate SOME transmission without banning all eating and drinking (which is largely impossible anyway, think workers).

@maxam_ross@August_West_GD@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan再次强调，除了吃和喝之外，室内任何地方都有规定。如果你想在不禁止所有饮食的情况下减少某些传播，这是完全有道理的（想想工人们，这在很大程度上是不可能的）。

@RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan They matter if you don't go to bars and restaurants. My vulnerable grandmother has to pick up her prescriptions in a pharmacy sometimes (delivery not always available). It's helpful if everyone there is wearing a mask even if the same person may not be down the street at a bar.

@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan如果你不去酒吧和餐馆，它们很重要。我脆弱的祖母有时不得不去药房取药（不总是可以送货）。如果在场的每个人都戴着口罩，即使同一个人可能不在街上的酒吧里，也会很有帮助。

@August_West_GD @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Huh? This isn't even complicated.
There is a rule for masking indoors with an exception for eating and drinking. You want to change the exception to include the entirety of restaurants? Okay, probably harmless, but why even care?
NYC essentially did this BTW.

@August_West_GD@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan哈？这一点都不复杂。
除了吃和喝之外，有一条规定可以在室内遮掩。您想将例外情况更改为包含所有餐厅吗？好吧，也许无害，但为什么还要在意呢？
纽约基本上就是这么做的。

@Iceteamom53 @KashPrime @Pseudome17 @fitterhappierAJ See @LeonardiBot

@Iceteamom53@KashPrime@Pseudome17@fitterhappierAJ见@LeonardiBot

@olga_basso This one won't work, because covid doesn't spread in schools. In fact it spread so little we don't even need to test there.

@olga_basso这一个行不通，因为新冠病毒不会在学校传播。事实上，它传播得很小，我们甚至不需要在那里进行测试。

@jmcrookston @0bj3ctivity @watermelonpunch @fitterhappierAJ @ChristosArgyrop Saying anything other than vax turns you into superman without the possibility of kryptonite = "antivax".

@jmcrookston@0bj3ctivity@watermelonpunch@fitterhappierAJ@ChristosArgyrop说除vax以外的任何话都会让你变成超人，而不可能是kryptonite=“antivax”。

@mikejohansenmd I suspect some of it may have been counterproductive because it was overly focused on influenza.

@mikejohansenmd我怀疑其中一些可能适得其反，因为它过度关注流感。

@RomancingNope @uche_blackstock That's virtually every state except mask mandates in a few states.
I don't know why this keeps getting framed in terms of "restrictions" and "opening up".

@RomancingNope@uche_blackstock，除了少数几个州的口罩授权之外，几乎每个州都有。
我不知道为什么这件事总是被用“限制”和“开放”来形容。

@goldberg_dan @RyanMarino Aklalime, come on its right in the name.

@goldberg_dan@RyanMarino Aklalime，以它的名义出现在它的右边。

@RyanMarino Who is going to tell her?

@瑞安马里诺谁会告诉她？

@itshullabalulu @WHCOS Yes!
We're going to downplay them on the way up and then claim credit for "progress" on the way down.

@是的！
我们将在上升的过程中淡化他们，然后在下降的过程中为“进步”争取荣誉。

@awsparling @AndrewEwing11 You can analytically get there, but it takes more steps than relying on the analog computer.

@awsparling@AndrewEwing11你可以通过分析达到目的，但这比依赖模拟计算机需要更多的步骤。

@macroliter Take a screen shot?

@拍一张屏幕截图？

@shanusmcanus1 @Viro_Mike @Gab_H_R https://twitter.com/ReformedTr...

@shanusmcanus1@Viro_Mike@Gab_H_Rhttps://twitter.com/ReformedTr...

@841920Meema6 @RadioFreeTom @SethBKrantz @mehdirhasan IT'S
NOT
ONLY
THE
ANTIVAXERS
CAUSING
THIS
Probably 20%, at least, of the deaths are vaxed.
High prevalence and failing vaxes = vaxed and done is dumb.

@841920 Meema6@RadioFreeTom@SethBKrantz@mehdirhasan是
不
只有
这个
反吸血鬼
造成
这
至少可能有20%的死亡是由性传播引起的。
高患病率和失败的VAX=VAX和done是愚蠢的。

@RadioFreeTom @JeremyLevine92 @mehdirhasan Even setting aside that this disease is less well understood, there are NO respiratory illnesses with even close to the same population impact. That is, risk of being infected considered alongside outcomes if infected.
They're all MUCH lower risk for one or the other or both.

@RadioFreeTom@Jeremeylevine92@mehdirhasan即使撇开这种疾病不太为人所知，也没有哪种呼吸系统疾病对人口的影响接近相同。也就是说，被感染的风险与感染后的结果一起考虑。
对于其中一个或另一个或两者，它们的风险都要低得多。

@DailyJLee @RadioFreeTom @iamjohnk2 @mehdirhasan @LibyaLiberty Lightning strike deaths per year in the US is about 50. Even setting aside tail risk of new variants and long covid risks, anyone who thinks their short term vaccinated covid death risk is even close to that is just not well informed (including maybe reading too much Leonhardt)

@DailyJLee@RadioFreeTom@iamjohnk2@mehdirhasan@LibyaLiberty美国每年的雷击死亡人数约为50人。即使撇开新变种的尾部风险和长期新冠病毒风险不谈，任何认为自己的短期接种新冠病毒死亡风险甚至接近这一风险的人都只是没有充分的信息（包括可能读了太多Leonhardt）

@SethBKrantz @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Low funding, capacity, and influence of public health is definitely a factor. Many non-nerds didn't and still don't even know that roadmap existed, and it couldn't compete for visibility with their boss who was tweeting demands to "LIBERATE" [sic, all caps] at the same time.

@SethBKrantz@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan公共卫生的资金、能力和影响力低肯定是一个因素。许多非书呆子甚至都不知道路线图的存在，也仍然不知道，路线图无法与同时在推特上要求“解放”（原文如此，所有上限）的老板争夺知名度。