@thereal_truther @joaquinlife I think you're underestimating the social cost of even frequent mild illness. Time lost from work, reduced productivity, canceled activities, quality of life, etc.
Covid is likely now similar to flu in severity for middle age or older, but at this point far more frequent.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife我认为你低估了即使是频繁的轻微疾病的社会成本。工作时间损失、生产力降低、活动取消、生活质量等。
新冠肺炎在中年或老年人中的严重程度可能与流感相似，但在这一点上更为频繁。

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Yeah I don't know what he wants, but improved building codes, workplace safety regulations, required and/or public-funded sick pay, all seem good to me. I was in favor of all these things before covid, it only adds to their value.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife是的，我不知道他想要什么，但改进的建筑规范、工作场所安全法规、规定的和/或公共资助的病假工资，对我来说都很好。在新冠肺炎之前，我支持所有这些事情，这只会增加它们的价值。

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Milder is good, it doesn't mean harmless. Many are still vulnerable and everyone will become vulnerable in time (unless dead early for whatever reasons). We also don't know the rate (or certainty) of "milding", so it is prudent to work to layering risk reduction.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife Milder是好的，它并不意味着无害。许多人仍然脆弱，每个人都会变得脆弱（除非出于任何原因提前死亡）。我们也不知道“挤奶”的速度（或确定性），因此谨慎的做法是分层降低风险。

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Ventilation won't "just happen" on it's own. A patchwork of a few places here and there improving ventilation on their own is not effective. There's a significant coordination effort needed. Plus many important facilities (e.g. schools) are literally government.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife通风不会“只是发生”在它自己。到处拼凑一些地方来改善通风效果是无效的。需要进行大量的协调工作。此外，许多重要设施（如学校）实际上都是政府提供的。

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Improving ventilation is very likely a positive for society and can be supported by government. Likewise, continued funding of improved vaccines (vaccines are a public good, they'll be undersupplied and overpriced if left to the private sector) and other reasonable measures.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife改善通风很可能对社会有积极影响，可以得到政府的支持。同样，继续为改进疫苗提供资金（疫苗是公共产品，如果留给私营部门，它们将供应不足，价格过高）和其他合理措施。

@G_Commish @fitterhappierAJ @CT_Bergstrom The strategy is respecting nature. Nature is great right?

@G\u Commish@fitterhappierAJ@CT\u Bergstrom战略是尊重自然。大自然是伟大的，对吗？

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Getting reinfected twice per year or once per year or once every five years makes a very significant difference in any number of ways.
I'm not quibbling on containment, only on "best we can do".

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife每年两次或每年一次或每五年一次再次感染在许多方面都会产生非常显著的差异。
我不是在围堵问题上吹毛求疵，只是在“我们能做的最好的”问题上。

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Everyone will be exposed at some point but by now that is mostly irrelevant since most people already have. But reinfections are a fact of life too. There is a rate of infections going forward and they carry significant risk especially to those who are or become more vulnerable.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife每个人都会在某个时候暴露出来，但到目前为止，这几乎无关紧要，因为大多数人已经暴露了。但再次感染也是生活中的一个事实。未来的感染率很高，尤其是对那些脆弱或变得更脆弱的人来说，感染风险很大。

@Ayei_Eloheichem Does the fascination with Transylvania have to do with the weird shit that Alex Jones was going on about Count Dracula?

@对特兰西瓦尼亚的迷恋与亚历克斯·琼斯对德古拉伯爵的古怪行为有关吗？

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Experts have been calling for this, and it's even part of policy at various levels but not a lot of effort/resources is being put into it.

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife的专家一直在呼吁这一点，这甚至是各级政策的一部分，但投入的精力/资源并不多。

@thereal_truther @joaquinlife Best we can do is probably too strong a claim. There are reasonable measures such as improving ventilation that reduce the intensity of transmission and therefore the number of infections over time (probably not just covid but others too).

@thereal_truther@joaquinlife我们能做的最好的事情可能是太强烈了。有一些合理的措施，如改善通风，可以降低传播强度，从而减少感染数量（可能不仅是新冠肺炎，还有其他感染）。

@VanGennepD @CT_Bergstrom How does 90-10 differ from 50-50 or 10-90?
In all cases they're both significant threats going forward. In no case will it result in significant accountability.

@VanGennepD@CT_Bergstrom 90-10与50-50或10-90有何不同？
在所有情况下，它们都是未来的重大威胁。在任何情况下，这都不会导致重大责任。

@fitterhappierAJ @CT_Bergstrom That's "natural"

@fitterhappierAJ@CT\u Bergstrom这是“自然的”

@nailatrahman @MandateMasksNY @wsbgnl @NYCMayor You don't have to expect something to call for it.

@nailatrahman@MandateMasksNY@wsbgnl@NYCMayor你不必期待有什么需要。

@Aintropy @WalkerBragman Good point about the long covid reference though.

@不过，关于长covid参考，WalkerBragma的不稳定性是一个很好的观点。

@Aintropy @WalkerBragman It's only 5 days so I don't think that's really what they meant. She's whitewashing that the guidance says to go back out and infect people at five days even if you're coughing, sore throat, etc., as long as you're coughing a little less.

@Aintropy@WalkerBragman只有5天，所以我不认为这是他们真正的意思。她在粉饰指导书上说，即使你咳嗽、喉咙痛等，只要咳嗽少一点，也要在五天内回去感染人们。

@wsbgnl What is the percentage by population?

@wsbgnl人口百分比是多少？

@wsbgnl And, you know, OSHA.

@wsbgnl和OSHA。

@wsbgnl She could, and don't forget that CDC could also write that into its guidance.

@wsbgnl她可以，别忘了CDC也可以将其写入指南。

@thecardsharp2 @luckytran Heh, you may be right, but people home because society is forcibly shut down works too.

@thecardsharp2@luckytran嘿，你可能是对的，但人们回家是因为社会被强行关闭了。