@DailyJLee @Alagai @ECMcLaughlin @joshtpm Interesting debate. I think there's merit on both positions!

@DailyJLee@Alagai@ECMcLaughlin@joshtpm有趣的辩论。我认为这两个职位都有优点！

@Andy_Bloch @joshtpm In that environment I'd have worn airtight goggles but I guess you didn't need it.

@Andy_Bloch@joshtpm在那种环境下，我会戴上密封护目镜，但我想你不需要。

@WalkerBragman Remember, this is the same person who told us it was good news that vulnerable people were dying.

@WalkerBragman记住，正是这个人告诉我们，弱势群体正在死亡是个好消息。

@soapboxlady @JonahDispatch 1) It IS politics now.
2) Both poor education and concerted effort by people who stand to gain (mostly ultra rich)

@soapboxlady@JonahDispatch 1）现在是政治。
2） 贫穷的教育和那些注定会获益的人（大多是超级富豪）的共同努力

@unlikelydarling @amesrobb Most people start to test negative around days 8-11. If you test every single day you end up with a very similar outcome.

@大多数人在8-11天左右开始测试呈阴性。如果你每天都进行测试，结果会非常相似。

@tupelohoneyyyyy @EvanHandler @lweisenthal @DrEricDing @TSA @flyLAXairport @wsbgnl Nobody has to "volunteer". It's an airport. It has workers of all kinds including security.
If you weren't an anti mask troll you would have actually read the thread where you are spewing nonsense and realized this was about LAX airport and not retail workers or pharmacy techs.

@Tupelohoneyyyyyy@EvanHandler@lweisenthal@Drericing@TSA@flyLAXairport@wsbgnl没有人需要“志愿者”。这是一个机场。它有各种各样的工人，包括保安。
如果你不是一个反面具巨魔，你会读到你胡言乱语的帖子，并意识到这是关于机场松懈，而不是零售工人或制药技术人员。

@tupelohoneyyyyy @EvanHandler @lweisenthal @DrEricDing @TSA @flyLAXairport @wsbgnl A facility having rules is NOT unusual nor is it "controlling what people do".
I'm sure LA airport has lots of rules. Cry baby antimaskism is the only thing that makes this look any different to you.
And yes, police will enforce people being disruptive.

@Tupelohoneyyyyyy@EvanHandler@lweisenthal@drericing@TSA@flyLAXairport@wsbgnl有规则的设施并不罕见，也不是“控制人们做什么”。
我相信洛杉矶机场有很多规定。哭吧，婴儿反自闭症是唯一让你觉得这一切不同的东西。
是的，警察会强制人们捣乱。

@spark1450 @EvanHandler @lweisenthal @DrEricDing @TSA @flyLAXairport @wsbgnl That's false. The judge struck down the federal mandate, not any local mandates.

@spark1450@EvanHandler@lweisenthal@Drericing@TSA@flyLAXairport@wsbgnl这是假的。法官驳回了联邦授权，而不是任何地方授权。

@oleole4 @lweisenthal @DrEricDing @TSA @flyLAXairport @wsbgnl The last part of that is a lie, although it's certainly possible that is a corporate policy above his pay grade. The CDC does not tell any business they can't require it of employees and/or customers.

@oleole4@lweisenthal@drericing@TSA@flyLAXairport@wsbgnl这最后一部分是谎言，尽管很可能这是一项高于其薪酬等级的公司政策。CDC没有告诉任何企业，他们不能要求员工和/或客户这样做。

@tupelohoneyyyyy @EvanHandler @lweisenthal @DrEricDing @TSA @flyLAXairport @wsbgnl Like any premise, you ask people to leave if they won't follow the rules. If they become disruptive or violent, it becomes a police matter.
Nothing unusual about this. If people were disruptive in some other way, stealing from retailers, throwing food, even running around, same.

@Tupelohoneyyyyyy@EvanHandler@lweisenthal@drericing@TSA@flyLAXairport@wsbgnl像任何前提一样，如果人们不遵守规则，你会要求他们离开。如果他们变得破坏性或暴力，那就成了警察的事。
这没什么不寻常的。如果人们以其他方式捣乱，从零售商那里偷东西，扔食物，甚至到处乱跑，也是一样。

@brandonsmith_wx @wsbgnl @WaitingOnBiden There is no "proper" here. "This time last year" is a perfectly valid status check-in.
So, agree to disagree.

@brandonsmith_wx@wsbgnl@WaitingOnBiden这里没有“适当的”。“去年这个时候”是一个非常有效的状态登记。
所以，同意不同意。

@MullingMueller @wsbgnl Correct

@MullingMueller@wsbgnl正确

@karenldr @wsbgnl @micah_arsham Does it end?

@karenldr@wsbgl@micah\u arsham它结束了吗？

@MullingMueller @wsbgnl Guess what, the economy will be just fine, it doesn't need you (to spend the maximum amount at all times). "But the economy" is a form of manufactured panic.

@MullingMueller@wsbgnl猜猜看，经济会好起来的，它不需要你（在任何时候都要花最大的钱）。“但经济”是一种人为的恐慌。

@brandonsmith_wx @wsbgnl @WaitingOnBiden I kind of agree but there is no easy source for that data. Not reasonable to expect people to do data analysis for every quick tweet. 7 day is the best we have for accessible real time data that isn't totally useless like daily.

@brandonsmith_wx@wsbgnl@WaitingOnBiden我有点同意，但没有简单的数据来源。期望人们对每一条快速推特都进行数据分析是不合理的。对于可访问的实时数据来说，7天是最好的时间，而不是像每天一样完全无用。

@RichardfromSyd1 @TrotStats @GidMK @dgurdasani1 @100Dianne @MackayIM @ConversationEDU How do we know?

@RichardfromSyd1@TrotStats@GidMK@dgurdasani1@100Dianne@MackayIM@ConversationEDU我们怎么知道？

@Rogueharpie @joshtpm Must be coincidence. {sarcasm}

@Rogueharpie@joshtpm一定是巧合。{讽刺}

@joshtpm Vaccinated and boosted (which really helped through 2021, less so now). Avoiding the 3Cs (even before I know of that term). High quality masks (even before mandated or recommended by "experts"). Dial down risk during surges (though never fully "stayed home").

@joshtpm接种了疫苗并提高了免疫水平（这在2021起到了真正的作用，但现在作用不大）。避免使用3C（甚至在我知道这个术语之前）。高品质口罩（甚至在“专家”授权或推荐之前）。浪涌期间降低风险（尽管从未完全“呆在家里”）。

@sheaffer117 @AnnClar70178059 @business @AP Just about any disease CAN be spread through sex.
Touching clothing and skin is something you do as a parent, working at a dry cleaner, during sports, etc. It's not specific to sex.

@sheaffer117@AnnClar70178059@business@AP几乎任何疾病都可以通过性传播。
触摸衣服和皮肤是你作为父母、在干洗店工作、运动期间等所做的事情。这并不特定于性。

@AnnClar70178059 @sheaffer117 @business @AP Also CDC: touching items such as clothing or touching skin. That's not sex.

@AnnClar70178059@sheaffer117@business@AP也CDC：触摸衣物或皮肤等物品。那不是性。