@thecardsharp2 @luckytran Or this. You can do that to a point, but it's limited and still doesn't really work.
https://www.npr.org/2022/02/02...

@thecardsharp2@luckytran或这个。你可以做到一定程度，但这是有限的，仍然没有真正的工作。
https://www.npr.org/2022/02/02...

@thecardsharp2 @luckytran At 10k/day, society would be shut down down to direct effects of death and disease. Remember January when schools were "staying open" despite sick teachers by packing students into auditoriums, and many businesses shut down due to sick workers. That was <3k/day.

@幸运的是，如果每天10公里，社会将因死亡和疾病的直接影响而关闭。还记得一月份吗？当时学校不顾生病的老师把学生塞进礼堂而“开门”，许多企业因工人生病而关闭。那是<；3公里/天。

@WalkerBragman In addition to other issues, she's misquoting the guidance.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@WalkerBragman除了其他问题外，她还错误地引用了指南。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@gregggonsalves @Uptheleft @lisa_iannattone @ScottGottliebMD That may happen, but even if it doesn't, increased mortality and disease-caused suffering is no fun either.

@gregggonsalves@Uptheleft@lisa_iannattone@ScottGottliebMD这可能会发生，但即使没有发生，死亡率的增加和疾病引起的痛苦也没有乐趣。

@MCCCANM Relative to occupancy (important qualifier!), ventilation on planes is fair to poor, and often even worse on the ground. Always difficult to link individual cases, but the conditions are certainly conducive to many pax and crew infections on board.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@相对于占用率（重要限定符！），飞机上的通风相当差，在地面上往往更差。通常很难将个别病例联系起来，但条件肯定会导致船上许多乘客和机组人员感染。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JeromeAdamsMD I just did searches on both twitter and the broader web for monkeypox and Trump and I found ZERO instances of people blaming Trump (which doesn't mean there literally aren't any, but there certainly aren't many), and some blaming Biden in the form of "if Trump"
Let this one go.

@JeromeAdamsMD我刚刚在推特和更广泛的网络上搜索了猴痘和特朗普，我发现没有人指责特朗普（这并不意味着实际上没有，但肯定没有很多），还有一些人以“如果特朗普”的形式指责拜登
让这个走吧。

@mimi828 @EB26420935 @ScottGottliebMD There is no feasible way to provide ubiquitous vaccines. Supply of the safe vaccine is and will be very limited for a long time and the smallpox vaccine, while effective and in somewhat ample supply, is not suited to mass vaccination for this disease.

@mimi828@EB26420935@ScottGottliebMD没有可行的方法来提供无处不在的疫苗。在很长一段时间内，安全疫苗的供应是非常有限的，天花疫苗虽然有效且供应充足，但不适合大规模接种这种疾病。

@Grannyshooligan @denise_dewald Try redimask.

@Grannyshooligan@denise_dewald试试Redismask。

@Noahpinion Considering gridlock and the politicized attacks on the very concept of public health, that isn't going to happen. Trying to get CDC to incrementally improve in place is the best you've got.

@考虑到僵局和对公共卫生概念的政治化攻击，这是不会发生的。试图让CDC逐步改进到位是最好的选择。

@firasd @Noahpinion They're following the case definition.

@firasd@Noahpinion他们遵循案例定义。

@BilgaNahar @CNBC @CNBCMakeIt As many times as people engage with it most likely. It's probably automated.

@BilgaNahar@CNBC@CNBC让人们尽可能多地参与其中。它可能是自动化的。

@dankellytweets @alexmeshkin Disclosure does not mean automatically disqualified, it means voters make well-informed decisions.

@dankellytweets@alexmeshkin的披露并不意味着自动取消资格，而是意味着选民做出了明智的决定。

@taipan168 @MackayIM @OzzyAussieOtty @EricTopol Seems pretty clear already. April 3 was the low point between waves. Total deaths already similar or higher, and current wave is far from over. https://t.co/npsA2CZ1su

@太班168@MackayIM@OzzyAussieOtty@EricTopol似乎已经很清楚了。4月3日是两波之间的低点。总死亡人数已经接近或更高，目前的浪潮还远未结束。https://t.co/npsA2CZ1su

@taipan168 @MackayIM @OzzyAussieOtty @EricTopol 7 day avg deaths is now 69. Peak in January was 87. But in reality the peak in January was very brief and the current wave is more of a slow burn, effectively bigger already.

@taipan168@MackayIM@OzzyAussieOtty@EricTopol 7天平均死亡人数现在是69人。1月的峰值是87人。但实际上，1月的峰值非常短暂，当前的浪潮更像是缓慢燃烧，实际上已经更大了。

@trunembak @pookleblinky Good luck getting high uptake with that vaccine. Maybe if things get REALLY bad, but not before, and vaccinating quickly during a crisis will be its own challenge.

@trunembak@pookleblinky祝你好运，能用这种疫苗获得高吸收率。也许如果情况真的变得很糟糕，但不是在之前，在危机期间快速接种疫苗将是它自己的挑战。

@Lotus_of_Honor @bone00afide SOME gun laws may work, OTHER gun laws may not work.

@莲花荣誉@bone00afide一些枪支法律可能有效，其他枪支法律可能无效。

@iamratkiller @ZekeboyA @NYPD121Pct @NYPDChiefPatrol I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm

@iamratkiller@ZekeboyA@NYPD121Pct@nypchiefpatrol我很确定这是讽刺

@Lotus_of_Honor @bone00afide You say gun laws will work because grenade laws work but many "gun laws" covers a very broad range of possible lawsand may very well work differently from each other much less grenade laws.

@Lotus_of_Honor@bone00afide你说枪支法会起作用，因为手榴弹法是有效的，但许多“枪支法”涵盖了非常广泛的可能法律，很可能彼此的工作方式不同，更不用说手榴弹法了。

@OzzyAussieOtty As I understand it (may be wrong) the ACAM2000 vaccine can even be risky to IC folks who are merely in contact with someone who else is vaccinated. It seems problematic to use unless absolutely necessary.

@OzzyAussieOtty，据我所知（可能是错的），ACAM2000疫苗甚至可能对那些仅仅与接种疫苗的人接触的IC患者有风险。除非绝对必要，否则使用它似乎有问题。

@unlikelydarling @amesrobb This was NOT about generalized testing, it was about testing to exit isolation. One test at 5 days is reasonably effective at identifying the minority of cases where one can exit isolation early without infecting others resulting in those sorts of consequences for others.

@不太可能在amesrobb上标记这不是关于一般测试，而是关于退出隔离的测试。在5天内进行一次测试可以合理有效地识别少数病例，在这些病例中，一个人可以提前退出隔离状态，而不会感染其他人，从而对其他人造成此类后果。