@Marco_Piani It is quite literally exponential growth. He shouldn't say that it isn't. It would be fine to explain why this isn't important or needs to be qualified, but not to deny it.

@马可·皮亚尼（Marco_Piani）这实际上是指数增长。他不应该说不是。可以解释为什么这不重要或需要限定，但不要否认这一点。

@d_a_keldsen @Marco_Piani He probably knows but doesn't care. He wants to push a story and that's more important than actual math.

@d_a_keldsen@Marco_Piani他可能知道但不在乎。他想推动一个故事，这比实际的数学更重要。

@Marco_Piani It's at least the second time he's made that claim. I corrected it once before including drawing the straight lines on the semilog graph. "Influencer" logic I guess.

@马尔科·皮亚尼（Marco_Piani），这至少是他第二次这样说。在包括在半对数图上绘制直线之前，我纠正了一次。我猜是“影响者”的逻辑。

@jeffandersoncpa @FedoraTrading @DereckCoatney I didn't follow the case but wasn't she the one making the statements about her own (claimed) experiences. If so and if the statements were false, she would certainly know they were false. Different from a reporter who tries but gets it wrong.

@jeffandersoncpa@FedoraTrading@DereckCoatney我没有关注这个案例，但她不是那个对自己（声称）的经历做出陈述的人吗。如果是这样，如果这些陈述是虚假的，她肯定会知道它们是虚假的。不同于一个记者，他试了试，但弄错了。

@jeffandersoncpa @FedoraTrading @DereckCoatney He proved actual malice (according to the jury).

@jeffandersoncpa@FedoraTrading@DereckCoatney他证明了自己的恶意（根据陪审团）。

@NancyK07312478 @ddiamond You should be hearing from the expert scientists at CDC not the political appointee. That was a campaign promise of Biden but never happened. The scientists have been sidelined since early 2020 and though both administrations for fear they might say something "off message".

@NancyK07312478@ddiamond你应该从CDC的专家科学家那里听到消息，而不是政治任命者。这是拜登的竞选承诺，但从未实现。自2020年初以来，科学家们一直被排除在外，尽管两届政府都担心他们可能会说一些“离题”的话。

@OG97921596 @kprather88 Some of them come in regular and small size. Aura is "one size fits most".

@OG97921596@kprather88其中一些有规则和小尺寸。Aura是“一刀切”。

@Investor_NICK_ @ThanosCapital You think DeSantis wants to fight inflation, LOL? He LOVES inflation as long as inflation is Biden's problem.
Many red states have cut taxes.

@投资者NICK@ThanosCapital你认为DeSantis想要对抗通货膨胀，哈哈？只要通货膨胀是拜登的问题，他就喜欢通货膨胀。
许多红色州已经减税。

@FedoraTrading @DereckCoatney With a public figure you have to prove actual malice. Not only was it false but the publisher knew it was false or was reckless in not checking. If they had reasonable sources even if the sources were wrong, they're probably legally safe. But it's still gross/tabloidish.

@Fedoratrating@DereckCoatney与一位公众人物，你必须证明自己的恶意。它不仅是假的，而且出版商知道它是假的，或者不计后果地不检查。如果他们有合理的来源，即使来源是错误的，他们可能在法律上是安全的。但它仍然是粗俗/小报。

@thereal_truther @ETJY @joaquinlife Heh, don't forget Berenson

@thereal_truther@ETJY@joaquinlife嘿，别忘了贝伦森

@JeromeAdamsMD Okay, after rereading it I see your point, but, respectfully as well, IMO it wasn't clearly conveyed.

@JeromeAdamsMD好的，在重读之后，我明白你的观点，但是，同样尊敬的是，我没有清楚地表达出来。

@ETJY @thereal_truther @joaquinlife Some more room on boosters probably.

@ETJY@thereal\u truther@joaquinlife可能在推进器上有更多的空间。

@ETJY @thereal_truther @joaquinlife Sure, but what if anything can be done about it is more important than merely observing it. "Hard no" has been stuck in a narrow range the whole time and all the other categories have been whittled down to very little. https://www.kff.org/coronaviru... https://t.co/1wE51Z3Qx0

@ETJY@thereal\u truther@joaquinlife当然，但如果能对此采取任何措施，那将比仅仅观察它更重要。“严格禁止”一直停留在一个狭窄的范围内，所有其他类别都被削减到很少。https://www.kff.org/coronaviru... https://t.co/1wE51Z3Qx0

@ETJY @thereal_truther @joaquinlife And it has limited (not zero as some claim) effect on illness and transmission. So in terms of reducing rate of even non-severe illness and accompanying disruption of schools, economy, and risk to vulnerable, it may not even be the most impact narrowly, but still important.

@ETJY@thereal\u truther@joaquinlife，它对疾病和传播的影响有限（不是一些人所说的零）。因此，就降低非严重疾病的发病率以及随之而来的对学校、经济和弱势群体风险的破坏而言，从狭义上讲，这甚至可能不是最大的影响，但仍然很重要。

@ETJY @thereal_truther @joaquinlife Vaccination is more or less the baseline already. Most people who are going to get vaccinated are vaccinated. Obviously keep it available and keep encouraging but if you want to do more it's in addition to that.

@ETJY@thereal\u truther@joaquinlife疫苗或多或少已经是基线。大多数要接种疫苗的人都接种了疫苗。很明显，保持可用性，并保持鼓励，但如果你想做更多，这是除此之外。

@bennpeifert It's obviously because Joe asked nicely.

@很明显，这是因为乔问得很好。

@D2X_DT2 @CryptoEthan People chasing number go up, and there is no shortage of that ever.

@D2X_DT2@CryptoEthan人追逐的数字不断上升，而且从来都不缺少。

@ETJY @thereal_truther @joaquinlife Certainly true, as with masking elsewhere. Obviously some disagree with CDC on this. And further, are people willing to do it? (Mostly it seems, in some cases yes, in some cases not.) If not, then what are the second best solutions.

@ETJY@thereal\u truther@joaquinlife当然是真的，就像其他地方的掩蔽一样。显然，有些人不同意CDC的观点。此外，人们愿意这样做吗？（大多数情况下，在某些情况下是的，在某些情况下不是。）如果不是，那么第二好的解决方案是什么。

@thereal_truther @ETJY @joaquinlife But to cycle back, any benefit might be further reduced with HEPA filters. So, again, need to understand data/details, not necessarily generalize.

@thereal_truther@ETJY@joaquinlife但要循环回来，使用高效空气过滤器可能会进一步降低任何益处。因此，再次强调，需要理解数据/细节，而不一定要概括。

@thereal_truther @ETJY @joaquinlife Children being low risk is not necessarily relevant even if true (definitely debated including long covid). Frequent illness alone is costly. If you can reduce kids/teachers getting sick, missing school, and infecting family members that may be worthwhile. As you say, need data.

@thereal_truther@ETJY@joaquinlife儿童的低风险并不一定相关，即使是真的（肯定有争议，包括长冠状病毒）。单是经常生病就要付出高昂的代价。如果你能减少孩子/老师生病、缺课和感染家庭成员，这可能是值得的。正如你所说，需要数据。