@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly Risk factors favor Japan due to age. Much, much larger risk than obesity.

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly由于年龄原因，风险因素对日本有利。比肥胖的风险要大得多。

@jfeldman_epi Wishing a speedy and full recovery.

@jfeldman_epi希望能尽快完全康复。

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly You can give them the benefit of the doubt for now. https://t.co/AnG3qptttH

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly你现在可以给他们带来怀疑的好处。https://t.co/AnG3qptttH

@spikespeigel @luckytran @MarchForScience The map to the left is from the CDC web site. You have to change a menu option to "community transmission" to see it. The one on the right....

@spikespeigel@luckytran@MarchForScience左边的地图来自CDC网站。您必须将菜单选项更改为“社区传输”才能看到它。右边的那个。。。。

@mskathleenquinn @empathy1st1 @ParentMishmash @ncweaver It was a bad sign when both the "American Rescue Plan" (rescuing from a pandemic) and proposed "Build Back Better" (building back from a pandemic) didn't include anything significant to improve pandemic preparedness and response.

@mskathleenquinn@Impathy1st1@ParentMishmash@ncweaver当“美国救援计划”（从大流行中拯救）和提议的“更好地重建”（从大流行中重建）都没有包括任何对改善大流行准备和应对的重大内容时，这是一个坏迹象。

@Bob_Wachter @ddiamond Most likely this is based on little more than self-inflicted incompetence in getting needed funding from Congress.

@鲍勃·瓦赫特（Bob_Wachter@ddiamond）最有可能的原因是，在从国会获得所需资金方面，这只不过是自己造成的无能。

@DrEricDing @ddiamond {SCREAM}
"how many people have died compared to covid?” he said. “Zero … We declare public health emergencies based on the data and the science, not on our worries.”

@dRicing@ddiamond{尖叫}
“与新冠肺炎相比，有多少人死亡？”他说。“零……我们宣布公共卫生紧急情况是基于数据和科学，而不是基于我们的担忧。”

@TrungTPhan That or twitch. Hard to compare because only one is revenue generating.

@TrungTPhan或twitch。很难比较，因为只有一个是创收的。

@ENirenberg @grahamwalker Oh, it probably will.
Eventually there will be a course correction of some sort, but getting there may be very messy.

@埃尼伦伯格@格雷厄姆·沃克哦，可能会的。
最终会有某种形式的航向修正，但要做到这一点可能会非常混乱。

@ENirenberg @JHowardBrainMD Good. Don't dance around it. If you want to live in a society you have certain responsibilities, helping to protect the pregnant and their fetuses being one of them.
Treating this basic principle as negotiable and coddling objectors is what allows antivax to thrive.

@ENirenberg@jhowardbraind很好。不要绕着它跳舞。如果你想生活在一个社会中，你有一定的责任，帮助保护孕妇及其胎儿。
将这一基本原则视为可协商和宽容的反对者，是antivax得以蓬勃发展的原因。

@mocoband @DrEricDing @justthefacts85 That's exactly what it is. A way to put lipstick on a pig and push the same policy without calling it that.

@mocoband@drericing@justthefacts85就是这样。一种在猪身上涂口红并推行同样政策的方法，而不用这样称呼它。

@DrEricDing @CDCDirector @ddiamond In addition to other issues, she's misquoting the guidance.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@除了其他问题外，她还引用了错误的指导。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@EmmanuelMStudio @SBakerMD More of course, but still underrepresented. 30% obesity rate in England and nowhere near that out walking around in London.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@EmmanuelStudio@SBakerMD当然更多，但仍然代表不足。英国有30%的肥胖率，而在伦敦走来走去却远未达到这一水平。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@Dave99117584 @jallepap @phealthsean @michaelmina_lab @macroliter @ENirenberg @zoonotic1 LOL do they plan out their one lifetime chance in advance or is it an "impulse purchase"

@Dave99117584@jallepap@Phelthsean@michaelmina_lab@Macrolel@ENirenberg@zoonotic1 LOL他们是提前计划好一生的机会还是“冲动购买”

@Dave99117584 @jallepap @phealthsean @michaelmina_lab @macroliter @ENirenberg @zoonotic1 That's really odd frankly. Can never take it again but use it for a one time event? I guess it made sense to them.

@Dave99117584@jallepap@Phelthsean@michaelmina_lab@Macrolel@ENirenberg@zoonotic1坦白说，这真的很奇怪。不能再次使用它，而只能用于一次性活动？我想这对他们来说是有意义的。

@veggie64_leslie @DrEricDing @jljcolorado Since this just got retweeted I'll add this more rigorous analysis that supports what I said in 2020
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@veggie64_leslie@drericing@jljcolorado由于这篇文章刚刚被转发，我将添加更严格的分析来支持我在2020年所说的
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@NancyK07312478 @ddiamond https://www.medpagetoday.com/o...

@NancyK07312478@ddiamondhttps://www.medpagetoday.com/o...

@Dave99117584 @jallepap @phealthsean @michaelmina_lab @macroliter @ENirenberg @zoonotic1 Was this PEP? I'm not sure I see the point of such short term protection.

@Dave99117584@jallepap@phealthsean@michaelmina_lab@Macrolel@ENirenberg@zoonotic1这是政治公众人物吗？我不确定我是否明白这种短期保护的意义。

@Marco_Piani It's more like two months, but again, it's absolutely exponential (to a reasonable degree of fit) on the chart as far as it goes. Perfectly reasonable to say "this may be inaccurate due to data issues or" or "this may change" or "can't be sure", etc.

@马可·皮亚尼这更像是两个月，但再一次，它在图表上绝对是指数级的（达到合理的拟合程度）。完全有理由说“这可能由于数据问题而不准确”或“这可能会改变”或“不能确定”等。

@Marco_Piani Yes the inflection point is worth noting, but it was also some time ago.

@马可·皮亚尼（Marco_Piani）是的，转折点值得注意，但那也是一段时间以前的事了。