@GainOfDystopia @TRyanGregory Me ⬇️ https://t.co/ISL8HIj3A5

@GainOfDystopia@TryanGregory Me⬇️ https://t.co/ISL8HIj3A5

@GainOfDystopia @TRyanGregory The avatar is way down on the list of reasons people shouldn't be listening to that account.

@GainOfDystopia@TRyanGregory The avatar是人们不应该听这个故事的原因之一。

@ErinBanco @adamcancryn Add to list of things that should have happened months ago

@艾琳·班科（ErinBanco@adamcancryn）将几个月前本应发生的事情添加到列表中

@robinsoped101 @itshullabalulu Not a good fit.

@robinsoped101@itshullabalulu不太合适。

@__philipn__ I know (offline in person) three people who rebounded who all had enough trouble with access that they couldn't start until day 3 or maybe even 4. Yes this is anecdotal, but 0.005% (1/20k)? No way.

@__philipn_uuu我知道（亲自下线）三个反弹的人，他们都有足够的麻烦，直到第3天或甚至第4天才能开始。是的，这是个传闻，但0.005%（1/20k）？不可能。

@Lujan588 @bachyns Nearly all do. The situation has changed enormously since January when the guidelines were written. Yet CDC uses the 'lack of access' excuse to maintain the current guidelines that push people back to work quickly, contagious or not.

@Lujan588@bachyns几乎所有人都这样做。自今年1月编写准则以来，情况发生了巨大变化。然而，疾病控制与预防中心利用“缺乏接触”的借口，维持目前的指导方针，即推动人们迅速返回工作岗位，无论是否具有传染性。

@benedictecallan @wsbgnl He could just give a straight answer the question instead of evading it, and help inform by expressing his opinion as an expert and public official
He's also not with CDC by the way, he's a presidential advisor.

@benedictecallan@wsbgnl他可以直接回答问题，而不是回避问题，并以专家和公职人员的身份表达自己的意见，帮助提供信息
顺便说一句，他不是CDC的，他是总统顾问。

@rodd_heino @edsuom Just like mosquitoes.

@rodd_heino@edsuom就像蚊子一样。

@AmmahStarr @joaquinlife Someone might learn something. With emphasis on might.

@AmmahStarr@joaquinlife有人可能会学到一些东西。强调力量。

@richiegogo @EricTopol You seemed to miss this part
"VE vs hospitalization reduced from 93% (BA.2) to 77% (BA.5)"
77% VE is good, but still leaves many vaccinated being hospitalized, at least those with relatively high risk to begin with.

@richiegogo@EricTopol你似乎错过了这一部分
“VE与住院率之比从93%（BA.2）降至77%（BA.5）”
77%的VE是好的，但仍有许多接种疫苗的人住院，至少是那些风险相对较高的人。

@KAErdmann @Noahpinion What about 2020?

@KAErdmann@Noahpinion 2020年怎么样？

@PlainolBlackman @MeetJess Not reported ones!
No testing, no cases.

@PlainolBlackman@MeetJess没有报道！
没有测试，没有案例。

@VioletEglantine @asaltandbuttery @peaklifestyle @Monkeypoxtally Save the tattoos.

@VioleteGrantine@asaltandbuttery@peaklifestyle@MonkeyPoxtly保留纹身。

@Peter_Atwater @jameshenryand @dontflytoohigh Not at all clear what this means. There was probably significant need during the Great Recession, but it doesn't show up at all. Maybe more awareness of food banks over time? https://t.co/NLLxdIXKSQ

@Peter_Atwater@jameshenryand@dontflytoohigh根本不清楚这意味着什么。在大萧条期间可能有大量需求，但根本没有出现。也许随着时间的推移，人们对食物银行的认识会提高？https://t.co/NLLxdIXKSQ

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly Unfortunately I'm sure you are correct there will be an uptick. Japan has very high vax and boosted rates but it's hard to know if there are important unvaxed pockets like HK, so it remains to be seen how much of one.

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly不幸的是，我相信你是对的，将会出现上升。日本有很高的vax，并提高了利率，但很难知道是否有像香港这样重要的未征税口袋，所以这其中有多少仍有待观察。

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly Cheers

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly干杯

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly Sources are in the next tweet

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly消息来源在下一条推特中

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly We don't really know infections at all, probably for either country.
It doesn't matter, the IFR tells you about baseline risk of the population before any infections even happen.

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly我们根本不知道感染情况，可能对这两个国家都是如此。
没关系，IFR会在任何感染发生之前告诉你人群的基线风险。

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly Sources:
https://github.com/mbevand/cov...
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

@twksicem@luckytran@joannaconn3lly来源：
https://github.com/mbevand/cov...
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

@TWKsicem @luckytran @JoannaConn3lly Yes, they are.
Based on age demographics, Japan had a baseline (original variant, pre-vax) IFR of about 2% and the US more like 1%. Obesity increases risk by around 2x (maybe less for "merely" obese but not severely), and US has 30% more than Japan. Age 3x more significant.

@TWKsicem@luckytran@JoannaConn3lly是的，他们是。
根据年龄统计数据，日本的基线（原始变量，vax前）IFR约为2%，美国约为1%。肥胖会增加大约2倍的风险（对于“单纯”肥胖的人来说可能更少，但并不严重），美国比日本多30%。年龄是显著年龄的3倍。