@grahamwalker @TheAngryEpi @pwhickey @CDCgov I don't think we can tell (esp w/limited testing). If it increases by 10x/month in MSM (what we seen in reported cases) and 2x/month in other groups, after three months 99% of cases are MSM but it is still spreading dangerously in the other groups, just more slowly.

@grahamwalker @TheAngryEpi @pwhickey @CDCgov 我认为我们无法分辨（尤其是有限测试）。如果 MSM 每月增加 10 倍（我们在报告的病例中看到），其他组每月增加 2 倍，三个月后 99% 的病例是 MSM，但它仍在其他组中危险地传播，只是更慢。

@Billflanigan @PrinceAwkwardII @a_mcglothern @yashar "Last longer" is objective but "successful" is pretty subjective.

@Billflanigan @PrinceAwkwardII @a_mcglothern @yashar “持续更长的时间”是客观的，但“成功”是相当主观的。

@Asta_de_B @jmcrookston I don't know what you mean by "most recent COVID wave" but the Omicron wave in early 2022 in most of the world was faster than that. Most earlier covid waves weren't (first one unclear due to low/no testing and lack of recognition of cases).

@Asta_de_B @jmcrookston 我不知道您所说的“最近的 COVID 浪潮”是什么意思，但 2022 年初在世界大部分地区的 Omicron 浪潮比这更快。大多数早期的covid浪潮都没有（由于低/没有测试和缺乏对病例的识别，第一个尚不清楚）。

@toba @CDCDirector I haven't seen it either.

@toba @CDCDirector 我也没见过。

@Vibinmyman @yishan Just look at the results.

@Vibinmyman @yishan 看看结果。

@michaelmina_lab @CDCDirector The positivity rate if you back it out (they don't report it explicitly as far as I can tell) is sky high. It is clear that only the most obvious cases are being tested, likely at an advanced stage.

@michaelmina_lab @CDCDirector 如果您退出（据我所知他们没有明确报告），阳性率会很高。很明显，只有最明显的案例正在测试中，可能处于后期阶段。

@wsbgnl The flatline of reported cases is remarkable.
Meanwhile, back up to nearly 500 deaths per day.

@wsbgnl 报告病例的平线非常显着。
与此同时，每天有近 500 人死亡。

@ibrake4ants @ColinDotNet https://abcnews.go.com/Enterta... https://t.co/DYAuFGUpxH

@ibrake4ants @ColinDotNet https:// /abcnews.go.com/Enterta... https://t.co/DYAuFGUpxH

@Monica_Babiuk @michaelmina_lab @DrEricDing @CDCDirector @POTUS She's a political appointee who has done exactly what she was hired to do.

@Monica_Babiuk @michaelmina_lab @DrEricDing @CDCDirector @POTUS 她是一名​​政治任命者，她所做的正是她受雇做的事情。

@DrEricDing @michaelmina_lab @CDCDirector She'd be just as tone deaf in Atlanta.

@DrEricDing @michaelmina_lab @CDCDirector 她在亚特兰大就像聋哑人一样。

@ColinDotNet Looks like it might be, I didn't watch it.
https://twitter.com/ibrake4ant...

@ColinDotNet 看起来可能是，我没看。
https://twitter.com/ibrake4ant...

@toba @CDCDirector It's not hard to figure out since she's telling you the number of tests and the number of cases is reported. (Yes, it is alarmingly sky high.)

@toba @CDCDirector 不难弄清楚，因为她告诉你检测的数量和报告的病例数量。 （是的，它高得惊人。）

@leahmcelrath You're looking at it.

@leahmcelrath 你在看它。

@MerciNoCoup @lafourchette @kavitapmd Long before that.
1994:
https://www.atlantamagazine.co...

@MerciNoCoup @lafourchette @kavitapmd 早在那之前。
1994 年：
https://www.atlantamagazine.co...

@_PH___PH_ @NjbBari3 @MeetJess @ejustin46 It's recommended if you're traveling to regions with polio.
I guess that now includes NY.

@_PH___PH_ @NjbBari3 @MeetJess @ejustin46 如果您要前往患有脊髓灰质炎的地区，建议您这样做。
我想现在包括纽约。

@TheAltcoinHub Will work if hacker is really bad at math.

如果黑客真的不擅长数学，@TheAltcoinHub 会起作用。

@nickiykwim @flowermusickids @mildanalyst @justthefacts85 @danaparish @DrEricDing @farid__jalali @YouAreLobbyLud @MeetJess @xabitron1 @jmcrookston @LazarusLong13 @LauraMiers He certainly can, doesn't make it accurate.

@nickiykwim @flowermusickids @mildanalyst @justthefacts85 @danaparish @DrEricDing @farid__jalali @YouAreLobbyLud @MeetJess @xabitron1 @jmcrookston @LazarusLong13 @LauraMiers 他当然可以，但并不准确。

@jmcrookston @flowermusickids @mildanalyst @justthefacts85 @danaparish @DrEricDing @farid__jalali @YouAreLobbyLud @MeetJess @xabitron1 @LazarusLong13 @LauraMiers I've not seen any evidence that anyone in the West views pandemics as disaster response.

@jmcrookston @flowermusickids @mildanalyst @justthefacts85 @danaparish @DrEricDing @farid__jalali @YouAreLobbyLud @MeetJess @xabitron1 @LazarusLong13 @LauraMiers 我没有看到任何证据表明西方有人将流行病视为灾难应对。

@Emachine4230 @aetherbinge @SusiAnsujali @ddiamond Thank you for the explanation. When they posted the first tweet MPX probably wasn't on the "list" of pathogens their products were known to work against (though this is not quite the same as "doesn't work"), because nobody thought about MPX before.

@Emachine4230 @aetherbinge @SusiAnsujali @ddiamond 谢谢你的解释。当他们发布第一条推文时，MPX 可能不在他们的产品已知可以对抗的病原体“列表”中（尽管这与“不起作用”并不完全相同），因为之前没有人考虑过 MPX。

@greg_howard @LazarusLong13 "Time out" likely to be less effective with MPX btw.

@greg_howard @LazarusLong13 “超时”可能对 MPX 不太有效。