Aeon 的最新消息
@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl Or to put it another way, you can not refute what he's saying by claiming it is wrong. He will come forward with evidence that it isn't wrong, which does exist (including your chart). You have to recognize it is narrowly true but deliberately incomplete and misleading framing.
@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl 或者换句话说,你不能通过声称它是错误的来反驳他所说的。他会拿出证据证明它没有错,这确实存在(包括你的图表)。你必须承认它是狭隘的真实,但故意不完整和误导性的框架。
@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl I do think it's important because propaganda with a kernel of truth is potentially even more dangerous. So it is useful to recognize it as such and be very clear in calling out how it is stretching the truth and using that to manipulate.
@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl 我确实认为这很重要,因为带有真理核心的宣传可能更加危险。因此,识别它本身并非常清楚地指出它是如何延伸真相并利用它来操纵它是很有用的。
@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl It's not wrong it is just manipulative and misleading. Pay close attention to the words used. "Works". According to your chart it does "work", it's just that in a real world, useful, practical sense "works" is a continuum not a light switch.
@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl 这没有错,只是操纵和误导。密切注意使用的单词。 “作品”。根据您的图表,它确实“起作用”,只是在现实世界中,有用的、实际意义上的“起作用”是一个连续体,而不是一个电灯开关。
@stargazing90 Also ignores how common these "preexisting conditions" really are.
https://twitter.com/MandateMas...
Over 75% of US adults have at least one increased-risk condition for severe COVID, according to research in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology.
#WearAMask #MandateMasksNY
@stargazing90 也忽略了这些“预先存在的条件”有多普遍。
https://twitter.com/MandateMas...
根据《美国预防心脏病学杂志》的研究,超过 75% 的美国成年人至少患有严重 COVID 的风险增加。
@MxRJ611 @Monkeypoxtally It's been roughly 10 days the whole time (=10x per month). I don't know where the frequently repeated suggestion of two week doubling time comes from.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@yaneerbaryam 10x increase per month https://t.co/k5lBcJseWX
发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin@MxRJ611 @Monkeypoxtally 整个时间大约有 10 天(= 每月 10 次)。不知道经常重复的两周倍增时间的建议从何而来。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@yaneerbaryam每月增长10倍https://t.co/k5lBcJseWX
@grahamwalker @TheAngryEpi @pwhickey @CDCgov Even with hypothetically perfect universal testing, faster spread in a subpopulation can mean 99% of cases in that subpopulation while still dangerously spreading outside the subpopulation. Read above again.
@grahamwalker @TheAngryEpi @pwhickey @CDCgov 即使假设是完美的普遍测试,在一个亚群中更快的传播可能意味着该亚群中 99% 的病例,同时仍然危险地传播到亚群之外。再读一遍上面。
@Vortex_warrior @grahamwalker @TheAngryEpi @pwhickey @CDCgov Everybody wants to drive looking in the rear view mirror (i.e. "data"). The only way that doesn't get you into a bad accident is if you are extremely lucky.
@Vortex_warrior @grahamwalker @TheAngryEpi @pwhickey @CDCgov 每个人都想开车看后视镜(即“数据”)。唯一不会让您陷入严重事故的方法是您非常幸运。