@lymanstoneky Considering the number of above-trend elderly and other vulnerable people who died in 2020 and 2021, normal would be below trend and possibly an outright decrease (the same person can't die twice).

@lymanstoneky 考虑到在 2020 年和 2021 年死亡的高于趋势的老年人和其他弱势群体的数量，正常情况下将低于趋势并且可能会完全减少（同一个人不能死两次）。

@sbmeunier @rolandlisf @MaryKang23 @hil_fung @AdrianaRezal The headline is pure clickbait. If you look in the article the numbers given are mostly a few points different between the cities with NYC still far behind 2019 on many metrics.

@sbmeunier @rolandlisf @MaryKang23 @hil_fung @AdrianaRezal 标题纯属点击诱饵。如果您在文章中查看，给出的数字在纽约市在许多指标上仍远远落后于 2019 年的城市之间大多相差几分。

@judedoesthat @exsibilation @Bob_Wachter When the guidance starts out ignoring science, people are misled. I've had friends who could isolate longer but were told including by their doctors that they didn't need to isolate or test after 5 days (in fact told not to). Out in the real world confused message only gets worse

@judedoesthat @exsibilation @Bob_Wachter 当指导开始忽略科学时，人们就会被误导。我有朋友可以隔离更长时间，但他们的医生告诉我，他们不需要在 5 天后进行隔离或检测（实际上被告知不要）。在现实世界中，混乱的信息只会变得更糟

@judedoesthat @exsibilation @Bob_Wachter Nuance would be giving scientifically accurate advice and then offering sensible step downs as higher risk but also reasonable alternatives. But, for example, 5 day isolation is just terrible and credibility destroying when it is quite plausible that day 5 is PEAK infectiousness.

@judedoesthat @exsibilation @Bob_Wachter Nuance 将提供科学准确的建议，然后提供合理的降级作为更高风险但也是合理的替代方案。但是，例如，当第 5 天的传染性很可能达到峰值时，5 天的隔离就是可怕的，而且可信度会被破坏。

@judedoesthat @exsibilation @Bob_Wachter Not exactly. Guiding people to do what they are doing anyway will be most followed but isn't useful guidance at all. It needs to be a balance between utility and compliance.

@judedoesthat @exsibilation @Bob_Wachter 不完全是。指导人们做他们正在做的事情将是最受关注的，但根本不是有用的指导。它需要在实用性和合规性之间取得平衡。

@JewStats @_TheAncientOne_ @michaelmina_lab @CDCgov @NIH @US_FDA Yes but it deflects blame. Two people out sick due to virus is less politically problematic than one person out on isolation policies that are blamed on leaders.

@JewStats @_TheAncientOne_ @michaelmina_lab @CDCgov @NIH @US_FDA 是的，但它转移了指责。两个人因病毒而生病在政治上的问题比一个人因被指责为领导人的隔离政策而出现的问题要小。

@wsbgnl (The bolding is in the original document, so clearly they consider this important. Make it make sense.)

@wsbgnl（粗体在原始文档中，很明显他们认为这很重要。让它有意义。）

@wsbgnl Explain this when people go back to school, work, and public settings after 5 days: https://t.co/8dwzUQN6Wq

@wsbgnl 当人们在 5 天后回到学校、工作和公共场所时解释这一点：https://t.co/8dwzUQN6Wq

@VincentRK Yes and no. Even with the current composition of Congress, deals were made, horses were traded. I argue this was a bad compromise vs. say, making the cap $2500 and starting in 2023 or 2024. Effect on actual individual humans is too easily abstracted into a budget number.

@VincentRK 是的，也不是。即使以目前的国会组成，也达成了交易，交易了马匹。我认为这是一个糟糕的妥协，而不是说，从 2023 年或 2024 年开始，将上限设为 2500 美元。对实际个人的影响太容易抽象为预算数字。

@VincentRK It's possible to recognize that it is better than nothing and it is hard to pass these bills, and also recognize this aspect is still horrible.

@VincentRK 可以认识到总比没有好，很难通过这些法案，并且也认识到这方面仍然很可怕。

@DonaldJTrumpJr https://t.co/xL1KpzgPyi

@DonaldJTrumpJr https://t.co/xL1KpzgPyi

@VincentRK 2025?
These are elderly people, not teenagers. Making them wait 3 years (i.e. a substantial portion of their life expectancy and destruction of savings) is horrible.

@VincentRK 2025？
这些是老年人，而不是青少年。让他们等待 3 年（即他们预期寿命的很大一部分和储蓄的破坏）是可怕的。

@farid__jalali "consider"

@farid__jalali “考虑”

@ChipD82 @JWGibbs @Sammy_Roth @latimes California uses negligible coal, but the point is valid more broadly.

@ChipD82 @JWGibbs @Sammy_Roth @latimes California 使用的煤炭可以忽略不计，但这一点在更广泛的意义上是有效的。

@EnemyInAState This is a situation where the difference matters more than the ratio.

@EnemyInAState 这是一种差异比比率更重要的情况。

@charlie_savage @maggieNYT Is it clear that (Donald) Trump is the target?

@charlie_savage @maggieNYT 很清楚（唐纳德）特朗普是目标吗？

@berman_allen @apmalong Nah, perfectly reasonable to question claims.

@berman_allen @apmalong Nah，质疑索赔是完全合理的。

@berman_allen @apmalong (Especially if you're counting the 600 people the average American supposedly knows. Those are certainly not people with close relationships.)

@berman_allen @apmalong （特别是如果您计算美国人平均认识的 600 人。这些人肯定不是关系密切的人。）

@berman_allen @apmalong You don't actually know that you don't know someone with long covid. People don't always discuss their medical conditions. I learned someone I know has long covid only after they had it for a year.

@berman_allen @apmalong 您实际上并不知道您不认识长期感染的人。人们并不总是讨论他们的医疗状况。我知道我认识的人在他们感染了一年后才长期感染。

@lvnvmom @myrabatchelder Brookline, nearby and slightly less wealthy, but still described here as "One of America's Most Elite Suburbs"
https://slate.com/human-intere...

@lvnvmom @myrabatchelder Brookline，在附近，稍微不那么富裕，但在这里仍然被描述为“美国最精英的郊区之一”
https://slate.com /human-intere...