@wsbgnl @nailatrahman What gain in protection? Vaccines have LOST efficacy, only partially made up with boosters. Paxlovid has replaced monoclonals and isn't known to work all on vaccinated or previously recovered people (in any case certainly results in many rebounds).

@wsbgnl @nailatrahman 获得什么保护？疫苗具有 LOST 功效，仅部分由增强剂组成。 Paxlovid 已经取代了单克隆抗体，并且并不知道对接种疫苗或之前康复的人都有效（无论如何肯定会导致很多反弹）。

@mayodweller @aquariusproject @YouAreLobbyLud @fitterhappierAJ Date of tweet marked https://t.co/w6UktZW1JM

@mayodweller @aquariusproject @YouAreLobbyLud @fitterhappierAJ 推文日期标记 https://t.co/w6UktZW1JM

@FireEyes66 @Lujan588 @crazymcmama @PippiPosts @WalkerBragman @DrJasonJohnson Almost 500

@FireEyes66 @Lujan588 @crazymcmama @PippiPosts @WalkerBragman @DrJasonJohnson 差不多 500

@dr_kkjetelina @Theresa_Chapple @luckytran @asosin @Lakshmi_RKG Parents are going to miss work, avoidably, when another kid comes to school infectious and infects theirs. These policies and their effects and burdens need to be considered beyond individual families.

@dr_kkjetelina @Theresa_Chapple @luckytran @asosin @Lakshmi_RKG 当另一个孩子来学校感染并感染他们的孩子时，父母会不可避免地错过工作。这些政策及其影响和负担需要在个别家庭之外加以考虑。

@dynamic_fatima @denise_dewald @NjbBari3 Even the PCR+ 90 days was very much out of context. It's an extreme rarity that CAN happen, but it's widely repeated (including by doctors) as if commonplace, and as reason why you can't or shouldn't test to exit isolation. Something is very wrong.
https://twitter.com/alexmeshki...

@dynamic_fatima @denise_dewald @NjbBari3 即使是 PCR 90 天也非常脱离上下文。可能发生这种情况极为罕见，但它被广泛重复（包括医生），就好像司空见惯一样，也是您不能或不应该进行测试以退出隔离的原因。事情很不对劲。
https://twitter.com/alexmeshki...

@RidleyDM @thereal_truther @GYamey @wanderer_jasnah Was referring to chicken pox

@RidleyDM @thereal_truther @GYamey @wanderer_jasnah 指的是水痘

@thereal_truther @RidleyDM @GYamey @wanderer_jasnah Odd I think. Kid being sick often means parent misses work. Cost of that has to be >> cost of vaccine.

@thereal_truther @RidleyDM @GYamey @wanderer_jasnah 我觉得很奇怪。孩子生病通常意味着父母错过工作。成本必须是

@Marco_Piani Birds of a feather https://t.co/KvAh24T6uv

@Marco_Piani 百鸟争鸣 https://t.co/KvAh24T6uv

@Marco_Piani I mean most of the GDB crew have veered into antivax or antivax-adjacent too, so probably both, but that's not right there in the screen shot.

@Marco_Piani 我的意思是大多数 GDB 工作人员也转向了 antivax 或 antivax-adjacent，所以可能两者都有，但屏幕截图中并不存在。

@Marco_Piani "The jabs are dangerous"

@Marco_Piani “刺拳很危险”

@Marco_Piani That's an antivaxer so not really going to like this argument.

@Marco_Piani 这是一个反吸毒者，所以不会真的喜欢这个论点。

@VincentRK (3) might be the most significant longer term because it puts most of the cost of the drugs on budget. There will be a much stronger budgetary incentive to stop getting fleeced.

@VincentRK (3) 可能是最重要的长期项目，因为它将大部分药物成本置于预算之内。将有更强大的预算激励来停止被掠夺。

@joeyfox85 @sri_srikrishna @Sophiepedia That is an interesting point. Number of infectious people is proportional to number of people, but there is a distribution, often one, sometimes zero. Not sure how to turn that into utility of airflow.

@joeyfox85 @sri_srikrishna @Sophiepedia 这是一个有趣的观点。感染人数与人数成正比，但有一个分布，通常为一，有时为零。不知道如何将其转化为气流的实用程序。

@sri_srikrishna @joeyfox85 @Sophiepedia * Assuming uniform or at least reasonable mixing and not a stream of air that happens to be blowing directly from one to the other.

@sri_srikrishna @joeyfox85 @Sophiepedia * 假设均匀或至少合理混合，而不是碰巧直接从一个吹到另一个的气流。

@sri_srikrishna @joeyfox85 @Sophiepedia I'm not sure what he means but the utility of ACH depends on occupancy. One person on each side of a lecture hall and you can get away with low ACH with relatively little risk. Fill it up with people and it's a different story.

@sri_srikrishna @joeyfox85 @Sophiepedia 我不确定他的意思，但 ACH 的效用取决于入住率。演讲厅的每一侧都有一个人，您可以以相对较小的风险摆脱低 ACH。把它填满人，这是一个不同的故事。

@RonFilipkowski That's not the bet. The bet is that they get more votes by supporting him whether he is guilty or not.

@RonFilipkowski 这不是赌注。赌注是，无论他是否有罪，他们都会通过支持他来获得更多选票。

@georgimarinov @michaelmina_lab Still in fuck around phase, that's why.

@georgimarinov @michaelmina_lab 仍然处于混蛋阶段，这就是原因。

@wanderer_jasnah @RidleyDM @GYamey Oh by all means. I was just citing the claimed reason I've read for why UK doesn't. I'm certainly not saying it is a good reason and I also find it not completely credible.

@wanderer_jasnah @RidleyDM @GYamey 哦，无论如何。我只是在引用我所读到的英国为什么不这样做的原因。我当然不是说这是一个很好的理由，我也觉得它并不完全可信。

@wanderer_jasnah @RidleyDM @GYamey The concern is the large population of older people who weren't vaccinated against chicken pox

@wanderer_jasnah @RidleyDM @GYamey 令人担忧的是大量没有接种水痘疫苗的老年人

@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl I have done that on numerous occasions including https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@mariavhawkins @wsbgnl 我曾多次这样做，包括 https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s.. .