@jajis60 @EricTopol Some studies showed an increase up to 4 weeks but it's likely somewhere around that.

@jajis60 @EricTopol 一些研究显示最多增加 4 周，但它可能在某个地方。

@garyrikard @EricTopol Not really that important since all students were tested weekly.

@garyrikard @EricTopol 并不是那么重要，因为所有学生每周都要接受测试。

@gardengirl778 @EricTopol All students were tested weekly, so the cases would be identified throughout the classroom. Whether they considered people not within six feet to be instances of "potential transmission" I don't know (didn't read paper).

@gardengirl778 @EricTopol 所有学生每周都接受测试，因此将在整个课堂上识别病例。我不知道他们是否认为六英尺以内的人是“潜在传播”的实例（没有读过论文）。

@danaludwig @JTSWIS @Progressive_RN @michael_hoerger @CDCgov It's mostly bullshit. There was probably some extremely rare case of it happening which got turned into CDC guidance and now it gets constantly mindlessly repeated by twitter "experts"
https://twitter.com/alexmeshki...

@danaludwig @JTSWIS @Progressive_RN @michael_hoerger @CDCgov 这主要是胡说八道。可能有一些极其罕见的情况发生，它变成了 CDC 的指导方针，现在它不断被推特“专家”无意识地重复
https://twitter.com/alexmeshki...

@JTSWIS @Progressive_RN @michael_hoerger @CDCgov Biden is using antigen tests.

@JTSWIS @Progressive_RN @michael_hoerger @CDCgov 拜登正在使用抗原测试。

@sammy4723 @scott_squires @michael_hoerger @CDCgov Learned helplessness

@sammy4723 @scott_squires @michael_hoerger @CDCgov 习得无助

@RealSexyCyborg @StevenMandrapa That's just some condition, not necessarily disabled. Some fraction do seem to be genuinely disabled, probably millions, and many of the others may have some reduced productivity. It's definitely not insignificant.

@RealSexyCyborg @StevenMandrapa 这只是一些条件，不一定是禁用的。有些部分似乎确实被禁用了，可能是数百万，而其他许多部分的生产力可能有所降低。这绝对不是微不足道的。

@SageWaterDragon @RealSexyCyborg @jmcrookston @K0idukas @Alitis__ @kwargsRichard That's really an odd question when the above thread was about upgrading the lights on an airplane. How is doing that lacking a long term plan? You upgrade the lights and keep the upgraded (which stops not only covid but lots of other nasties too). How is that a problem?

@SageWaterDragon @RealSexyCyborg @jmcrookston @K0idukas @Alitis_​​_ @kwargsRichard 当上面的主题是关于升级飞机上的灯光时，这真是一个奇怪的问题。缺乏长期计划怎么做？您升级灯并保持升级（这不仅会阻止covid，还会阻止许多其他讨厌的东西）。这怎么成问题？

@RealSexyCyborg *per day

@RealSexyCyborg *每天

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma One thing working in their favor is the debt being extremely low interest. IIRC there were even a few negative interest 'junk bonds'. Still, that doesn't mean you can't overpay. I'm sure some did.

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma 对他们有利的一件事是债务利息极低。 IIRC 甚至还有一些负利率的“垃圾债券”。不过，这并不意味着你不能多付钱。我敢肯定有些人做到了。

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma You put up the cash, I manage the property. When it is sold in say 10 or 20 years, I get a share of the proceeds even though I didn't invest anything.

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma 你存钱，我管理财产。当它在 10 年或 20 年后出售时，即使我没有投资任何东西，我也会获得收益的一部分。

@Gretchen415 By telling his Congresional leaders that's what he wanted them to write and pass. Nobody was looking to block the covid agenda that he ran on, or get in the way of the administration's ability to respond to what was then thousands of deaths per day as it deemed necessary.

@Gretchen415 通过告诉他的国会领导人这就是他希望他们写和通过的。没有人希望阻止他执行的新冠病毒议程，或妨碍政府在必要时应对当时每天数千人死亡的情况。

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma RE seems to get *more* favorable treatment since 2018.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... https://t.co/J9goKRlIan

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma RE 自 2018 年以来似乎得到了*更多*的优惠待遇。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... https://t.合作/J9goKRlian

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma A lot aren't, they're benefits to particular industries like mining, real estate, etc., and this one isn't really limited to just PE anyway. You could partner with a friend to buy a house where they put up more of the money and you take carried interest.

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma 很多都不是，它们对采矿、房地产等特定行业有好处，而且这个行业并不仅限于 PE。你可以和朋友合作买房子，他们会拿出更多的钱，然后你就会获得附带权益。

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma There have to be some bad deals but you can't really generalize since they're picking specific companies alleged valued on a cash flow not buying the market (maybe!)

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma 一定会有一些糟糕的交易，但你不能真正概括，因为他们选择的是据称以现金流而不是购买市场的特定公司（也许！）

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma I mean take a look at all the crap in the tax code. This is just one of a 1000 or 10000 things.

@JeremyTColes @ArmandDoma 我的意思是看看税法中的所有废话。这只是 1000 或 10000 件事情中的一件。

@adamnash @RyanLEllis @Noahpinion That's not really in line with the history of finance. People structure to minimize taxes.
Anyway, the tax difference relative to the overall budget seemed tiny (~$1.4B/year) in any case. Mostly symbolic/political, which is probably a big part of why it keeps getting punted.

@adamnash @RyanLEllis @Noahpinion 这不符合金融史。人员结构以尽量减少税收。
无论如何，无论如何，相对于总体预算的税收差异似乎很小（~$1.4B/year）。主要是象征性的/政治性的，这可能是它不断受到抨击的重要原因。

@kirkmurphy @FinchTH @NickytaLeb @james1chas3 Moderna reported trial data a few weeks ago. I think Pfizer did similarly. As the other reply noted, it's using a different pathway, more like flu shots.
https://investors.modernatx.co...

@kirkmurphy @FinchTH @NickytaLeb @james1chas3 Moderna 几周前报告了试验数据。我认为辉瑞也做了类似的事情。正如另一个回复指出的那样，它使用的是不同的途径，更像是流感疫苗。
https://investors.modernatx.co...

@adamnash @RyanLEllis @Noahpinion I think managers will receive fees (as they do now) and also invest in some form of equity that has high optionality, the result being much the same.
If you want to really close the loophole you have to tax capital gains higher.

@adamnash @RyanLEllis @Noahpinion 我认为经理们会收到费用（就像他们现在所做的那样），并且还会投资于某种形式的具有高选择性的股权，结果大致相同。
如果你想真正堵住漏洞，就必须对资本收益征税更高。

@adamnash @RyanLEllis @Noahpinion It's not just a commission. That's what you're missing. It's a commission that is reinvested back in the deal, giving the managers skin in the game. That's likely to have economic benefit.

@adamnash @RyanLEllis @Noahpinion 这不仅仅是佣金。这就是你所缺少的。这是一笔重新投资于交易的佣金，让经理们参与其中。这可能会带来经济效益。