@NjbBari3 This is a pretty low level of heat, and most masks will probably be okay with it. The recommendations for decon for SC-2 were hotter I think.
I'd still be cautious about strap degrading/breakage which happens quite a bit to some masks even without heat.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@NjbBari3 这是相当低的热量，大多数口罩可能都可以接受。我认为 SC-2 的 decon 建议更热门。
我仍然对表带降解/破损保持谨慎，即使没有加热，某些面罩也会发生相当多的情况。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@AmbLiuXiaoMing I see someone acting in a threatening manner here and it isn't Pelosi.

@AmbLiuXiaoMing 我看到有人在这里以威胁的方式行事，不是佩洛西。

@jesseintl @WalkerBragman When someone says two contradictory things at the same time the only thing you know for sure is that they are lying.

@jesseintl @WalkerBragman 当有人同时说两件相互矛盾的事情时，您唯一确定的是他们在撒谎。

@KrauthBen @mskathleenquinn @MackayIM @danfurst When you do a careful analysis beyond look at a chart and try too account for other differences (e.g. masks may substitute for other measures in a policy mix resulting in similar outcomes) you find transmission reduced ~20% (this study 19% others 20-25%)
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10...

@KrauthBen @mskathleenquinn @MackayIM @danfurst 当您仔细分析而不是查看图表并尝试考虑其他差异时（例如，口罩可能会替代政策组合中的其他措施，从而导致类似结果），您会发现传播减少了约 20% （本研究 19% 其他 20-25%）
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10...

@jesseintl @WalkerBragman She said "small chance" and then "not uncommon" right in this statement.
Huh?

@jesseintl @WalkerBragman 她在此声明中说“机会很小”，然后“并不少见”。
嗯？

@RidleyDM @AdithyaR_YXE @NjbBari3 (That article is from 2022, but it links back to bad advise from CDC in this one from the very first days of the Biden administration: https://www.cnn.com/videos/hea...)

@RidleyDM @AdithyaR_YXE @NjbBari3 （那篇文章来自 2022 年，但它链接到 CDC 在拜登政府执政初期在这篇文章中的糟糕建议：https://www.cnn.com/视频/头...）

@RidleyDM @AdithyaR_YXE @NjbBari3 Unfortunately in early 2021 the messaging (at least from CDC and others echoing it) was still very confused, and didn't improve quite for some time.
And arguably that may have been precisely the time when better masks would have been most useful.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...

@RidleyDM @AdithyaR_YXE @NjbBari3 不幸的是，在 2021 年初，消息传递（至少来自 CDC 和其他回应它的人）仍然非常混乱，并且有一段时间没有改善。
可以说，这可能正是更好的口罩最有用的时候。
https://www.washingtonpost.com...

@betterair4all @NoyesJHumphrey @bestqueenliz @MeetJess @ADanGrenier One situation where it might be okay to drink disinfectant.

@betterair4all @NoyesJHumphrey @bestqueenliz @MeetJess @ADanGrenier 一种情况，可以喝消毒剂。

@BarryHunt008 @mowoau @RealSexyCyborg Would this not imply that "far UV" aka 222nm produces ozone? Is it harmful?

@BarryHunt008@mowoau@RealSexyCyborg这难道不意味着“远紫外线”即222nm会产生臭氧吗？它有害吗？

@MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @danfurst Right. You can try to study it of course, but always going to be unknowns.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10...

@MackayIM@mskathleenquinn@danfurst Right。当然，你可以试着去研究它，但总是未知的。
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10...

@mskathleenquinn @MackayIM @danfurst It might help protect more vulnerable people.
Also, occasional surges don't necessarily invalidate the premise of masks reducing cases, if the surges are smaller, shorter, etc. (on the margin with all else being equal, always hard to establish).

@mskathleenquinn@MackayIM@danfurst它可能有助于保护更脆弱的人。
此外，如果浪涌较小、较短等（在所有其他条件相同的情况下，总是很难确定），偶尔的浪涌不一定会使减少案例的前提无效。

@AshishKJha46 How does that data from large health systems account for people who rebound but don't report it?

@AshishKJha46大型卫生系统的数据如何解释反弹但不报告的人？

@sermonofbacchus @yaneerbaryam Jynneos

@sermonofbacchus @yaneerbaryam Jynneos

@Magnunnr @tirelessdc @MeetJess @ADanGrenier Surface in the sun is going to be a lot hotter than air.
But cooler or cloudy days could be an issue.

@Magnunnr@Underminatedc@MeetJess@ADanGrenier太阳表面将比空气热得多。
但凉爽或阴天可能是一个问题。

@LetsFishSmarter @RemindMe_OfThis @RemindMe_OfThis 3 months https://t.co/mKKJ02OrF0

@LetsFishSmarter@RemindMe\u of this@RemindMe\u of This 3个月https://t.co/mKKJ02OrF0

@gorskon Just wait for more extreme weather. "Man, it's so hot out, it's gotta be like 140 hots" doesn't have the same ring to it.

@戈尔斯肯只是等待更极端的天气。“老兄，外面太热了，大概有140个热”可不是那么回事。

@APazyryk @RadCentrism Just your typical troll's everyday false dichotomy, nothing special.

@APazyryk@RadCentrism只是你典型的巨魔日常的错误二分法，没有什么特别的。

@tirelessdc @MeetJess @ADanGrenier Article says 20 minutes at 56º C (133º F) is enough to inactivate.

@MeetJess@ADanGrenier的一篇文章说，在56ºC（133ºF）下20分钟足以使其失活。

@NoyesJHumphrey @bestqueenliz @MeetJess @ADanGrenier I wouldn't trust most cheap commercial ethanol wipes to actually contain ethanol and no harmful contaminants, but high proof liquor should work and you don't need much to wipe food.

@NoyesJHumphrey@bestqueenliz@MeetJess@ADanGrenier我不相信最便宜的商用乙醇湿巾实际上含有乙醇并且没有有害污染物，但高浓度的酒精应该有效，你不需要太多来擦拭食物。

@AdithyaR_YXE @NjbBari3 Supplies of many types were depleted or restricted in 2020 by the time many people started looking for them, but that's not because they didn't exist.
Much harm was done by "experts" telling people that N95s were "too hard" or "too uncomfortable" for the public to use.

@2020年，当许多人开始寻找AdithyaR_YXE@NJBari3时，许多类型的供应已经耗尽或受到限制，但这并不是因为它们不存在。
“专家”告诉人们N95对公众来说“太硬”或“太不舒服”，这造成了很大的伤害。