@RodJane14 @mitch0z covid这种空气传播病毒其实是可以解决的。cholera不是这种，所以需要其他的方法，但是我觉得也是可以解决的。这个跟区块链的关系是有限的，有可能区块链可以用于融资，治理，记录？ https://t.co/updwfAVAui
@RodJane14 @mitch0z covid这种空气传播病毒其实是可以解决的。cholera不是这种，所以需要其他的方法，但是我觉得也是可以解决的。这个跟区块链的关系是有限的，有可能区块链可以用于融资，治理，记录？ https://t.co/updwfAVAui
RT: Good review, go read.
May write more, but my quick response (and I think Vitalik would agree) is that the network state concept is flexible enough to accommodate these proposed edits. It's very much a toolbox rather than a manifesto. https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
RT：复习得好，去读吧。
我可能会写更多，但我的快速反应（我认为维塔利克会同意）是，网络状态概念足够灵活，可以适应这些拟议的编辑。这在很大程度上是一个工具箱，而不是一个宣言。https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
@mitch0z More far-flung than Taiwan! https://t.co/9sWH6PFTwN
@mitch0z比台湾更遥远！https://t.co/9sWH6PFTwN
What do I think about network states?
This one somehow ended up VERY long, but.... oh well, enjoy!
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
我怎么看待网络状态？
这一次不知怎的结束了很长时间，但是。。。。哦，好吧，享受吧！
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
@forereth ZK rollups are achieving ~16 bytes per transaction today. So this is all a solved problem. Not yet for EVM rollups, but there, yes, application-specific compression algos are exactly how you solve it.
@今天，forereth ZK汇总实现了每个事务约16字节。所以这都是一个解决了的问题。对于EVM汇总还没有，但是，是的，特定于应用程序的压缩算法正是解决它的方法。
@forereth An attack to create 2**32 accounts is extremely expensive. Would take 6 million full blocks of spam transactions on Ethereum.
@对于创建2个**32帐户的攻击来说，代价极其高昂。将在以太坊上处理600万个完整的垃圾邮件交易。
@ishaantharoor @MacaesBruno I don't think we are disagreeing!
@ishaantharoor@MacaesBruno我不认为我们有分歧！
@kncukier Don't think we are disagreeing!
(TDS is anti-Trump people, WDS is anti-wokeness people)
@kncukier不要认为我们不同意！
（TDS是反特朗普的人，WDS是反wokeness的人）
@MacaesBruno @ishaantharoor Wokeness derangement syndrome is a worse disease than Trump derangement syndrome imo
@MacaesBruno@ishaantharoor Wokeness精神错乱综合征是一种比特朗普精神错乱综合征更严重的疾病
@DrIacob @RussiaUN @Dpol_un @mfa_russia @PMSimferopol @MID_RnD @RusEmbassyMinsk @CIS_Russia @RusBotschaft @RusMission_EU @RusBotWien @RF_OSCE @UN_News_Centre Basically every country has some level of neo-nazis.
Russia too, and quite a bunch of them: https://www.rferl.org/a/russia...
So I don't really think anti-Naziism is a fair argument to use to support one country against another.
@DrIacob@RussiaUN@Dpol\u un@mfa\u rusia@PMSimferopol@MID\u RnD@RusEmbassyMinsk@CIS\u rusia@RusBotschaft@RusMission\u EU@RusBotWien@RF\u OSCE@un News\u center基本上每个国家都有一定程度的新纳粹分子。
俄罗斯也是，其中有很多：https://www.rferl.org/a/russia...
所以我真的不认为用反纳粹主义来支持一个国家对抗另一个国家是公平的。
@RussiaUN @Dpol_un @mfa_russia @PMSimferopol @MID_RnD @RusEmbassyMinsk @CIS_Russia @RusBotschaft @RusMission_EU @RusBotWien @RF_OSCE @UN_News_Centre Сталин сотрудничал с нацистами почти целых два года по угнетению всех народов между Россией и Германией. Может быть, вам было бы лучше сначала извинится за это?
@russiaun@dpol_un@mfa_russia@pmsimferopol@mid_rnd@rusembassyminsk@cis_russia@rusbotschaft@rusmission_eu@rusbotwien@rf_osce@un_news_centre斯大林与纳粹合作了将近两年，压迫了俄国和德国之间的所有民族。也许你最好先道歉。
@MoonlitMonkey69 Some PoW protocols also do!
Eg. Ironically enough Ethereum gas limit voting.
Or the whole Bitcoin Unlimited philosophy from way back then.
@MoonlitMonkey69一些战俘协议也可以！
具有讽刺意味的是，以太坊气体限制投票。
或者说从那时起比特币的无限哲学。
@MarcTheBulll Show me which part of PoS lets validators vote on protocol parameters.
@Marcthebull告诉我PoS的哪一部分允许验证器对协议参数进行投票。
Also, small grammar nuance: in English when talking about things like proof of stake, we don't say "it's a security", we say "it's secure". I know these suffixes are hard though, so I forgive the error.
此外，还有一些语法上的细微差别：在英语中，当谈到利害关系证明之类的事情时，我们不会说“这是一种安全”，而是说“它是安全的”。我知道这些后缀很难，所以我原谅这个错误。
It's amazing how some PoW proponents just keep repeating the unmitigated bare-faced lie that PoS includes voting on protocol parameters (it doesn't, just like PoW doesn't) and this so often just goes unchallenged.
Nodes reject invalid blocks, in PoS and in PoW. It's not hard. https://twitter.com/NickDPayto...
Dear Proof of Stakers,
The fact that you can vote on something to change its properties is proof that it's a security.
Love, Bitcoin
令人惊讶的是，一些PoW支持者一直在重复一个彻头彻尾的赤裸裸的谎言，即PoS包括对协议参数的投票（它没有，就像PoW没有一样），而这往往没有受到质疑。
节点拒绝PoS和PoW中的无效块。这并不难。https://twitter.com/NickDPayto...
尊敬的Stakers证明，
事实上，你可以投票改变它的属性，这证明了它是一种安全性。
爱情，比特币
@skdh @robinhanson Status seeking is a zero-sum competitive game, so from a god's eye viewpoint it's worth setting norms to discourage it somewhat.
@skdh@robinhanson地位寻求是一个零和竞争游戏，所以从上帝的角度来看，设置一些规范来阻止它是值得的。
@PledditYT @robinhanson Small premines are glorious and good (though far from perfect, because they're not sustainable). The idea that miners should be the *only* ones who should get access to protocol-printed coins is an ideological perversion that the crypto space has thankfully moved beyond.
@Pledditytyt@robinhanson小型premines既光荣又美好（尽管远非完美，因为它们不可持续）。矿工应该是“唯一”应该获得协议印刷硬币的人，这是一种意识形态上的曲解，值得庆幸的是，加密空间已经超越了这种曲解。
RT: Our friends at @ethereum are looking for users, builders and enablers to join #cohort2 of their fellowship program!
How do we enable the next billion #Ethereum users to flourish?🌱
Help us bridge the gap!
📥 Applications are open until Jul 17 📥
https://fellowship.ethereum.fo... https://t.co/fI9L0WvQIo
RT：我们在@ethereum的朋友正在寻找用户、建设者和使能者加入他们联谊项目的#cohort2！
我们如何让下一个十亿以太坊用户蓬勃发展？🌱
帮助我们缩小差距！
📥 申请截止到7月17日📥
https://fellowship.ethereum.fo... https://t.co/fI9L0WvQIo
@robinhanson People don't want to admit to themselves that they have unflattering motives (in this case, desire to climb social hierarchy). I hear some economist even wrote a book about this, something about elephants or something
@罗宾·汉森（robinhanson）的人不想承认自己有不讨人喜欢的动机（在这种情况下，他们渴望爬上社会等级）。我听说一些经济学家甚至写了一本关于大象的书