IMO @bryan_caplan does this well. Very passionate libertarian, but he puts his biggest focus on libertarian ideas where he can come up with lots of evidence that they could actually do a lot of good for people. Open borders, housing reform, worrying less about education...

我认为布莱恩·卡普兰做得很好。非常有激情的自由主义者，但他把最大的精力放在自由主义思想上，在那里他可以拿出很多证据，证明他们实际上可以为人们做很多好事。开放边界、住房改革、减少对教育的担忧。。。

Motivation truly is important. You can keep going longer and focus harder on the mission if you can internally narrativize your intellectual life as a glorious search for freedom, enfranchisement of the weak, human progress, etc. Such energies can't be thrown away completely.

动机确实很重要。如果你能在内心将你的思想生活描述为对自由的光荣追求、对弱者的特权、人类进步等，你可以继续走得更远，更加专注于任务。这些能量不能被完全抛弃。

... because there are other options. A particularly important option is "data-driven choice of idea-driven ideas". Ideology generates hypotheses and provides motivation, but then you check them against reality, and be prepared to dismiss or de-emphasize some as a result.

... 因为还有其他选择。一个特别重要的选择是“数据驱动的想法驱动的选择”。意识形态产生了假设并提供了动机，但随后你将它们与现实对照，并准备好忽略或淡化某些假设。

I just remembered a conversation with @AnthonyLeeZhang from pre-covid times on the role of ideology in an intellectual's thinking.
The dichotomy of "idea-driven ideas" vs "data-driven ideas". Framed this way, ideology looks bad, but actually it's not so simple...

我刚刚想起了与《新冠肺炎前时代》的张（AnthonyLeeZhang）的一次对话，讨论了意识形态在知识分子思维中的作用。
“想法驱动的想法”与“数据驱动的想法”的二分法。这样设计，意识形态看起来很糟糕，但实际上并不是那么简单。。。

RT: AllCoreDevs Update #012 Fresh Off The Press 🔥
It covers the latest on The Merge, incl. how folks should prepare for it, the future of Ethereum testnets, progress on EIP-4844 and the recent client-focused PEEPanEIP series by @EthCatHerders 😸
https://tim.mirror.xyz/xkhOUpY...

转发：AllCoreDevs更新#012新闻稿🔥
它涵盖了关于合并的最新信息，包括人们应该如何准备、以太坊测试网的未来、EIP-4844的进展以及@EthCatHerders最近推出的以客户为中心的PEEPanEIP系列😸
https://tim.mirror.xyz/xkhOUpY...

RT: @scott_lew_is The first law of tokenomics: don't get your tokenomics advice from people who use the word "tokenomics"

转发：@scott\u lew\u是tokenomics的第一定律：不要从使用“tokenomics”这个词的人那里得到你的tokenomics建议

@scott_lew_is The first law of tokenomics: don't get your tokenomics advice from people who use the word "tokenomics"

@scott_lew_是tokenomics的第一定律：不要从使用“tokenomics”这个词的人那里得到你的tokenomics建议

@evabeylin I'm sad that this stuff is getting dug up by media through court records. Revealing details of personal family life should be a personal choice.

@evabeylin我很难过媒体通过法庭记录发现了这件事。透露个人家庭生活的细节应该是个人的选择。

@pourteaux What's wrong with druids? I would love to have cat form and run 30% faster and then be able to pop out and immediately make a healing spell.

@波尔图德鲁伊怎么了？我希望有猫的形态，跑得快30%，然后能够跳出并立即进行治疗。

RT: 📢📢📢 Ethereum Foundation Research AMA is open NOW on Reddit!
#Ethereum #AMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/ether...

转发：📢📢📢 以太坊基金会研究AMA现在在Reddit上开放！
#以太坊#AMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/ether...

RT: 📢📢📢 Ethereum Foundation Research AMA is open NOW on Reddit!
#Ethereum #AMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/ether...

转发：📢📢📢 以太坊基金会研究AMA现在在Reddit上开放！
#以太坊#AMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/ether...

RT: Ethereum research AMA in ~2 hours! https://twitter.com/drakefjust...

RT：以太坊研究AMA约2小时！https://twitter.com/drakefjust...

RT: Semaphore V2 is live! 🥳
Semaphore is a set of tools for building privacy into #Ethereum dapps. Users can prove group membership and send signals, without exposing their identity.
V2 is more efficient, secure and dev-friendly. Read all about it here: https://medium.com/privacy-sca...

RT：信号量V2处于活动状态！🥳
信号量是一组用于将隐私构建到#以太坊DAPP中的工具。用户可以证明组成员身份并发送信号，而无需公开其身份。
V2更高效、更安全且对开发人员更友好。请在此处阅读所有内容：https://medium.com/privacy-sca...

@koeppelmann @MeherRoy @drakefjustin @ultrasoundmoney The pattern of using a 6% honesty assumption with a 95% threshold sidechain, with fallback to ethereum if the DA breaks, is definitely a fascinating one, though I worry about the economics of dapps that use it and don't think through the exceptional case

@koeppelmann@MeherRoy@drakefjustin@UltrasonMoney使用6%诚实假设和95%阈值侧链的模式，如果DA中断，则返回以太坊，这无疑是一个有趣的模式，尽管我担心使用它的分布式应用程序的经济性，并且没有考虑例外情况

@koeppelmann @MeherRoy @drakefjustin @ultrasoundmoney The idea is that if you 51% attack a separate DA layer, you can break the assumptions of the L2 that uses it. But if you 51% attack a combined settlement+DA layer, then you can't, because anything with unavailable data will just by definition not be part of the canonical chain

@koeppelmann@MeherRoy@drakefjustin@UltrasonMoney的想法是，如果你51%攻击一个单独的DA层，你可以打破使用它的L2的假设。但是，如果你51%的攻击一个联合营地+DA层，那么你就不能，因为根据定义，任何有不可用数据的东西都不会成为规范链的一部分

@koeppelmann @MeherRoy @drakefjustin @ultrasoundmoney Because only ethereum's DA layer is 100% secure from the point of view of applications inside ethereum, because of tight coupling.
See also:
https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...

@koeppelmann@MeherRoy@drakefjustin@UltrasonMoney，因为从以太坊内部应用程序的角度来看，只有以太坊的DA层是100%安全的，因为紧密耦合。
另请参见：
https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...

@koeppelmann @MeherRoy @drakefjustin @ultrasoundmoney Data availability is not really commoditizable. There are large gains from using the same DA layer as your settlement layer.
But yeah I agree getting more L1 space is very valuable; it's good for L2s too because it lets them settle more frequently.

@koeppelmann@MeherRoy@drakefjustin@UltrasonMoney数据可用性并非真正可商品化。使用与你的营地层相同的DA层有很大的好处。
但是，是的，我同意获得更多的L1空间是非常有价值的；这对L2也有好处，因为它可以让它们更频繁地适应。

@owocki I kinda think that my time series graph of coalitions betraying each other with the 1/3 and 2/3 shifting gets pretty far already.

@owocki我有点认为我的时间序列图中的联盟以1/3和2/3的移位相互背叛已经相当远了。

@artsymonke @MeherRoy @drakefjustin @ultrasoundmoney Does Monke contribute to funding public goods?
If so, yes.

@artsymonke@MeherRoy@drakefjustin@UltrasoundMonke为公共物品提供资金吗？
如果是，是的。

@VeldNdops @owocki It's a formal mathematical model that roughly explains why there can't be an "end of history" and the current order is always vulnerable to being overturned.

@这是一个正式的数学模型，粗略地解释了为什么不可能有“历史的终结”，当前的秩序总是容易被推翻。