@BSmokes_ @TimBeiko @ercwl @allenf32 @udiWertheimer @adam3us Poisson process means there is a tiny chance of something happening every millisecond. Blocks in PoW are like this.
In PoS, a block appears once every 12s, it's a scheduled interval.

@BSmokes_u@TimBeiko@ercwl@allenf32@udiWertheimer@adam3us泊松过程意味着每毫秒发生某事的可能性很小。PoW中的方块是这样的。
在PoS中，一个块每12秒出现一次，这是一个预定的间隔。

@allenf32 @udiWertheimer @ercwl It's definitely not true that "the main motivation for the merge is reducing gas fees"
Scaling gains from PoS are far too small even if we could properly take advantage of them. We don't want 3x, we want 100x. Only sharding/rollups deliver 100x+
We have been consistent on this.

@allenf32@udiWertheimer@ercwl“合并的主要动机是降低汽油费”这绝对不是真的
即使我们可以适当地利用它们，PoS的缩放增益也太小了。我们不想要3倍，我们想要100倍。只有切分/汇总才能提供100倍+
我们在这方面一直保持一致。

@TimBeiko @ercwl @allenf32 @udiWertheimer @adam3us These gains are limited in practice because state is the main bottleneck and not execution, but they're there.

@TimBeiko@ercwl@allenf32@udiWertheimer@adam3us这些收益在实践中是有限的，因为状态是主要瓶颈，而不是执行，但它们确实存在。

@TimBeiko @ercwl @allenf32 @udiWertheimer @adam3us Also, "PoS doesn't help scaling" is overstated. It does somewhat:
* No Poisson process -> no linear uncle rates -> higher gaslimits safer; similar gains to Bitcoin NG ideas
* Allows committees, which are needed for sharding (incl dank-)
* Finality -> higher gaslimits safer

@TimBeiko@ercwl@allenf32@udiWertheimer@adam3us同样，“PoS无助于扩展”被夸大了。它在某种程度上：
*无泊松过程->；非线性叔叔率->；更高的气体极限更安全；与比特币类似的收益
*允许共享所需的委员会（包括dank-）
*最终性->；更高的气体极限更安全

@joshuamarch @Noahpinion @eatscifi My understanding is that the biggest problem with cultivated meat is that it doesn't have an immune system, so even the tiniest contamination can ruin a whole batch (and bioreactors sterile enough to protect against this are very expensive). How do you solve this?

@joshuamarch@Noahpinion@eatscifi我的理解是，养殖肉最大的问题是它没有免疫系统，所以即使是最微小的污染也可能毁掉整批肉（而无菌的生物反应器足以防止这种情况的发生非常昂贵）。你如何解决这个问题？

RT: 🎟 DEVCON TICKETS: WAVE-01 BEGINS MONDAY! 🎟
- Ticket release details (see blog below!)
- LAST CALL for the Devcon Auction & Raffle
- Ending Supporter Applications & more app-news
- Announcing Community Hubs
READ MORE: https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...

转发：🎟 DEVCON门票：WAVE-01周一开始！🎟
-门票发布详细信息（请参阅下面的博客！）
-Devcon拍卖的最后一次呼吁&；抽奖
-结束支持者申请；更多应用新闻
-宣布社区中心
阅读更多：https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...

@satofishi @chrisbbreuer No, the unit of weight.

@satofishi@chrisbbreuer No，重量单位。

@satofishi @chrisbbreuer And the pound?

@satofishi@chrisbbreuer和英镑？

@pourteaux It's not just some irrational emotional thing; norms are important because they reduce conflict, and violations legitimize other violations. "Don't invade people" is a deeper norm than violations within countries, consequences of the norm breaking are almost unboundedly terrible.

@这不仅仅是一些非理性的情感问题；规范之所以重要，是因为它们减少了冲突，违规行为使其他违规行为合法化。“不要侵犯人民”是一种比国家内部的违法行为更深刻的规范，违反规范的后果几乎是无穷无尽的可怕。

@chrisbbreuer CC @satofishi

@chrisbbreuer抄送@satofishi

@chrisbbreuer Imperial could be better if they changed the foot length to 29.9792458 cm, so the speed of light would be exactly 1 foot per nanosecond.
Could reduce pound to 403.7 grams to make gravitational constant a round number, but apparently GC is hard to precisely measure for now.

@如果他们把脚的长度改为29.9792458厘米，克里斯·布鲁尔·帝国可能会更好，因此光速将精确到每纳秒1英尺。
可以将磅减少到403.7克，使引力常数成为整数，但显然GC目前很难精确测量。

@pourteaux Neither of the latter have invaded foreign lands recently.

@波尔图最近两人都没有入侵外国领土。

@pourteaux To be fair, people who deny moral clarity of the Russia case also generally deny moral clarity of the cases against many of these other governments, so these countries supporting each other isn't going to make anyone change their mind.

@平心而论，否认俄罗斯案件道德清晰性的人通常也否认针对其他许多政府的案件道德清晰性，所以这些国家相互支持不会让任何人改变主意。

@crypcato I usually do literally say that.

@我通常是这么说的。

@nmobregon I do think the European Union's habit of referring to itself as Europe (eg. "the UK left Europe in 2016") is a bit overbearing and should be criticized more.

@我确实认为欧盟把自己称为欧洲的习惯（例如“英国在2016年离开了欧洲”）有点傲慢，应该受到更多的批评。

@bboosterz East Asian languages use YYYY-MM-DD (or YY-MM-DD) even in spoken form, and it feels completely natural to me. I think any order can come off the tongue nicely if you're used to it!

@bboosterz东亚语言甚至在口语中也使用YYYY-MM-DD（或YY-MM-DD），我觉得这很自然。我认为如果你习惯了，任何订单都可以很好地脱口而出！

@Splat_Pearled No. Never use that again. YYYY-MM-DD only.

@Splat_Pearled No.永远不要再使用它。仅YYYY-MM-DD。

@LimiAlb No. Never use that again. YYYY-MM-DD only.

@LimiAlb不。不要再使用它了。仅YYYY-MM-DD。

YYYY-MM-DD is the only correct date format.
* It's an ISO standard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
* It's unambiguous (is 03/05/22 March 5 or May 3? No such problem here!)
* General-purpose sorting sorts dates correctly
* East Asian countries like Japan 🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵 use it ("2022年5月3日") https://twitter.com/TerribleMa...

YYYY-MM-DD是唯一正确的日期格式。
*这是ISO标准：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
*这是明确的（3月5日或5月3日是3月5日或22日？这里没有这样的问题！）
*通用排序正确排序日期
*日本等东亚国家🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵 使用它（“2022年年5.月3.日") https://twitter.com/TerribleMa...

@artlu99 @spaceagente @thatguyintech @rainbowdotme @TheRoadToWeb3 Custom-made software:
https://github.com/vbuterin/bl...

@artlu99@spaceagent@thatguyintech@rainbowdotme@TheRoadTowB3定制软件：
https://github.com/vbuterin/bl...