RT: Don't let them vilify privacy. #privacyisnormal https://twitter.com/arstechnic... https://t.co/alWD7dFCmO

RT：不要让他们诽谤隐私。隐私是正常的https://twitter.com/arstechnic...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/alWD7dFCmO

@avsa @C1aranMurray There's lots of weird political intersections in this issue imo.
eg. for me personally I feel like I'm recovering from being misled by Club of Rome-style environmentalism of my youth that gave a strong sense that more population is net-bad (which I now understand to be mistaken)

@avsa@C1aranMurray在这个问题上有很多奇怪的政治交叉点。
就我个人而言，我觉得自己正在从我年轻时被罗马俱乐部式的环境保护主义所误导中恢复过来，这种主义给人一种强烈的感觉，即更多的人口是绝对有害的（我现在明白这是错的）

@avsa Human beings generally have strong positive externalities on other existing and future human beings (which historical experience shows us greatly overwhelms limits-to-resources concerns). So there is a public goods rationale for encouraging higher population.

@avsa人类通常对其他现有和未来的人类具有强大的正外部性（历史经验表明，这大大超过了对资源的限制）。因此，鼓励人口增加有一个公共品的理由。

RT: Need a little extra time to put together your application for the EF Fellowship Program? No worries!
Applications will now remain open until July 24th.
https://fellowship.ethereum.fo... https://t.co/b6tolrV1De

RT：需要一点额外的时间来准备EF奖学金计划的申请吗？别担心！
申请将持续到7月24日。
https://fellowship.ethereum.fo... https://t.co/b6tolrV1De

RT: 0. Fun piece of history about this:
the deposit contract the community used was just the first one to be uploaded w/ the verified bytecode
as far as I know, no one even knows who deployed it!
It wasn't "official" until the community opted to use it
https://twitter.com/BitcoinIsS...

转发：0。这是一段有趣的历史：
社区使用的存款合同只是第一个通过验证字节码上传的合同
据我所知，甚至没有人知道是谁部署了它！
直到社区选择使用它，它才是“官方的”
https://twitter.com/BitcoinIsS...

@Noahpinion Yeah, it's more a backup than an optimum.

@是的，这更像是一个备份，而不是一个最佳。

@Noahpinion The right-wing version is philanthropists, the left-wing version is like five clones of DARPA with different focuses (one for biotech, one for...)
And the idealistic futurist version is something based on quadratic funding.
All are good imo.

@Noahpinion右翼版本是慈善家，左翼版本就像DARPA的五个克隆体，具有不同的重点（一个用于生物技术，一个用于…）
理想主义的未来主义版本是基于二次投资的。
我觉得都很好。

@Noahpinion A possible alternative to "societal war mode" is "remove constraints and give resources to groups of people who are doing important stuff, and let/help them keep doing it, without really trying to get the entire public involved"

@Noahpinion“社会战争模式”的一个可能替代方案是“消除限制，为正在做重要事情的群体提供资源，让/帮助他们继续做，而不是真正试图让整个公众参与进来。”

@Noahpinion There are of course lots of brilliant people quietly working on those problems, and the intellectual discourse was key in inspiring them to do so, so it was not useless.

@毫无疑问，有很多才华横溢的人在默默地研究这些问题，而知识分子的话语是激励他们这样做的关键，所以这并不是没有用的。

@Noahpinion Abstract arguments about the future aren't good for public motivation, even if they are correct unfortunately.
Didn't work for climate change, didn't work for covid in early 2020, isn't working for life extension, isn't working for pandemic preparedness today...

@关于未来的抽象论据对公众动机不利，即使不幸的是这些论据是正确的。
没有为气候变化工作，没有在2020年初为新冠肺炎工作，没有为延长寿命工作，没有为今天的大流行准备工作。。。

RT: Let's think about DoS attacks against Ethereum block proposers and how validators can gain DoS resilience in the short-term and long-term!
https://ethereum-magicians.org...

RT：让我们想想针对以太坊块提议者的DoS攻击，以及验证器如何在短期和长期内获得DoS弹性！
https://ethereum-magicians.org...

RT: @VitalikButerin While overall I like this post. there is one very fundamental point on which I think it is just completely wrong and unfortunately much else turns on it. I hope you'll agree with me once I clarify and if not I am very happy to be on it as I think it is basically verifiable.

转发：@VitalikButerin，总的来说我喜欢这个帖子。有一个非常基本的观点，我认为这是完全错误的，不幸的是，还有很多其他的观点。我希望一旦我澄清，你会同意我的观点，如果不是的话，我很高兴参与进来，因为我认为这基本上是可以核实的。

Experimenting with gitcoin bounties to crowdsource improving my blog. Goal: add dark mode.
(Note: read carefully. The requirements include actually going through the posts and making sure they look good in dark mode, and editing if they don't) https://twitter.com/owocki/sta...

尝试gitcoin的悬赏来众包改善我的博客。目标：添加暗模式。
（注意：仔细阅读。要求包括实际浏览帖子，确保它们在黑暗模式下看起来很好，如果没有，则进行编辑）https://twitter.com/owocki/sta...

@glenweyl @lastcontrarian @audreyt yeah, when you start identifying with "not being caught up in the discourse" it's easy to accidentally start identifying with the largest counter-discourse you haven't yet labeled as being "a discourse". True independence requires actually thinking about the object-level issue

@glenweyl@lastcontrarian@audreyt是的，当你开始认同“不要陷入话语”时，很容易意外地开始认同你尚未被标记为“话语”的最大的反话语。真正的独立性需要真正思考对象级别的问题

@RichardHanania @glenweyl And I read that book and it was great!
Though I have been wondering whether your views have changed over the past year (after all, they have on other issues eg. China)

@RichardHanania@glenweyl和我读了那本书，很棒！
尽管我一直在想，在过去的一年里，你们的观点是否发生了变化（毕竟，他们在其他问题上，比如中国问题上，有过改变）

@glenweyl I think @RichardHanania would be better at explaining the position; his article https://richardhanania.substac... outlines the case.
(I'm not a "true believer" in this way of thinking personally; I'm closer to the "US foreign policy is an incoherent mash of lots of impulses" viewpoint)

@glenweyl我认为@RichardHanania会更好地解释这个位置；他的文章https://richardhanania.substac...概述了案例。
（我个人并不是这种思考方式的“真正信徒”；我更接近于“美国外交政策是一个由许多冲动组成的不连贯的混合体”的观点）

@glenweyl On the India example, the argument is that wokeness is making it harder to maintain the alliance because the pesky wokes keep criticizing Modi, whereas a 1970s US establishment would have cleanly come to a pragmatic understanding.

@格伦·威尔（glenweyl）以印度为例，他们的论点是，由于讨厌的沃克人不断批评莫迪，沃克尼斯（wokeness）正在使维持联盟变得更加困难，而20世纪70年代的美国机构本可以明确地达成务实的理解。

@glenweyl I think the "wokeness runs US foreign policy" people generally explicitly define it as a post-2010 phenomenon.

@glenweyl我认为“wokeness掌管美国外交政策”的人通常明确地将其定义为2010年后的现象。

@HotSpri75088483 @maximlott yes, both (and taiwan)

@Hotstri75088483@maximlott是的，都有（和台湾）

@maximlott I used to be more sympathetic to this until I properly appreciated how East Asia runs just fine on the ISO-style system even in spoken language. It doesn't feel unnatural at all!

@马克西姆洛特我以前对此更为同情，直到我正确地理解了东亚是如何在ISO风格体系中运行良好的，甚至在口语中也是如此。这一点都不觉得不自然！