@AnthonyLeeZhang @PGarimidi @Tim_Roughgarden @skominers Oh, you can do much worse by trading claims on a pot. But people seem to just carry on as though these issues don't exist.
What am I supposed to do? Publish this .png in a two-column latex pdf and upload it to arxiv to get people to take the problem seriously? https://t.co/0Gxx4l9pxs

@AnthonyLeeZhang@PGarimidi@Tim_Roughgarden@skominers噢，在一个罐子上交易索赔，你可以做得更糟。但人们似乎只是继续下去，好像这些问题不存在。
我该怎么办？在两列latex pdf中发布这个.png，并上传到arxiv，让人们认真对待这个问题？https://t.co/0Gxx4l9pxs

Agreeing with the proverb "those who most want to rule people are those least suited to do it" and supporting DAOs being run by transferable governance tokens is a contradiction.
Transferable governance tokens are all about giving *more* power to "those who most want to rule".

同意“最想统治人民的人是最不适合统治人民的人”这句谚语，而支持道由可转移的治理令牌运行是一个矛盾。
可转移的治理令牌都是为了给“最想统治的人”更多的权力。

@ArchChaudhury @PGarimidi @cdixon @Tim_Roughgarden @skominers Governance is fundamentally a public good, not a private good. "Governance power flows to those who have the biggest lust for power, as measured by market bids" is not a good mechanism. https://t.co/89zeKcwT3Q

@ArchChaudhury@PGarimidi@cdixon@Tim_Roughgarden@skominers治理从根本上说是公共利益，而不是私人利益。“根据市场出价衡量，治理权力流向那些对权力有最大欲望的人”不是一个好机制。https://t.co/89zeKcwT3Q

@ArchChaudhury @PGarimidi @cdixon @Tim_Roughgarden @skominers Make the governance tokens soulbound and I'd be happy.

@ArchChaudhury@PGarimidi@cdixon@Tim_Roughgarden@skominers将治理令牌灵魂绑定，我会很高兴。

@PGarimidi @cdixon @Tim_Roughgarden @skominers The economics of token-holder-driven governance are fundamentally broken.
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
Optimism's two-house model is a good example of a better path forward.
https://community.optimism.io/...

@PGarimidi@cdixon@Tim_Roughgarden@skominers代币持有人驱动的治理经济学从根本上被打破。
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
乐观主义的两院模式是一个很好的例子，说明了一条更好的前进道路。
https://community.optimism.io/...

@PGarimidi @cdixon @Tim_Roughgarden @skominers I really disagree with this direction honestly. Making marginal changes to token-driven governance and hoping for the best is putting lipstick on a pig.
We need to move away from token holder centrism more fundamentally and embrace non-financialized decentralized governance.

@PGarimidi@cdixon@Tim_Roughgarden@skominers我真的不同意这个方向。对代币驱动的治理进行边际变革，并希望达到最好，这就是给猪涂上口红。
我们需要从根本上摆脱代币持有人中心主义，接受非金融化的分权治理。

@balajis It was a good parody! Got me for a couple of seconds.

@巴拉吉斯，这是一个很好的模仿！让我呆了几秒钟。

RT: 📢📢📢 Goerli/Prater Merge Announcement 📢 📢📢
Prater will run through the Bellatrix upgrade on August 4th, and merge with Goerli between August 6-12th: if you run a node or validator, this is your last chance to go through the process before mainnet 🚨
https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...

转发：📢📢📢 戈利/普拉特合并公告📢 📢📢
Prater将于8月4日完成Bellatrix升级，并于8月6日至12日与Goerli合并：如果您运行节点或验证器，这是您在mainnet之前完成该过程的最后机会🚨
https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...

@attertweet Over time some judges of good and bad get exposed by reality to be complete fools, and we can stop listening to them.

@随着时间的推移，一些判断好坏的人被现实暴露出来，成为彻头彻尾的傻瓜，我们可以停止听他们说话。

@CryptoNadal Have you considered that many soy products are delicious and people like eating them?

@CryptoNadal你有没有想过很多豆制品都很好吃，人们都喜欢吃？

@attertweet This is exactly the permissionless ethos. We can't lock out baddies with hard power, so we have to guard against them with our soft power.

@attertweet这正是不允许的精神。我们不能用硬实力把坏人拒之门外，所以我们必须用软实力来防范他们。

Also an important lesson for the crypto space. Way too much mental gymnastics goes into defending things that a 12 year old applying a simple unnuanced "if it offers 20% APR it's a Ponzi" rule would correctly reject every time.

这也是加密空间的重要一课。一个12岁的孩子每次都会正确地拒绝使用一个简单而无说服力的“如果它提供20%的APR，那就是一个庞氏骗局”规则。

Sometimes the task of an intellectual isn't about trying to outsmart everyone or come up with the synthesis to the world's thesis and antithesis or whatever.
Rather, it's about knowing when to just reaffirm simple dumb rules like "invading people bad". https://twitter.com/MacaesBrun...

有时，知识分子的任务并不是试图智胜所有人，或提出世界论点和对立或任何东西的综合。
相反，这是关于知道什么时候重申简单的愚蠢规则，比如“坏人入侵”。https://twitter.com/MacaesBrun...

@Kdenkss Canada is actually not that welcoming and open to non-rich-country foreigners ☹
This is also my own experience from conferences; I've even seen organizers have a hard time getting in.

@Kdenkss加拿大实际上并不那么欢迎非富裕国家的外国人，也不向他们开放☹
这也是我在会议上的亲身经历；我甚至看到组织者很难进入。

@kate_sills I would not call myself a purist of any pole; I feel like I have sympathies with different parts of all three. Though more dig-dem and corp-lib than synth-tech.
(I would also call rationalists half corp-lib half synth-tech; pure synth-tech is more like WEF)

@凯特·西尔斯我不会称自己为任何波兰人的纯粹主义者；我觉得我对这三个角色的不同部分都有同情心。尽管与synth-tech相比，dig-dem和corp-lib更多。
（我也可以称理性主义者为半公司半合成技术；纯合成技术更像WEF）

@sassal0x They need more pictures though.
Here's a random one from 2013. https://t.co/wF5px0qTFi

@不过他们需要更多的照片。
这是2013年的一个随机样本。https://t.co/wF5px0qTFi

RT: 🎟️🎟️🎟️Two Waves🌊. Ticket Sales. Devcon Bogotá 🇨🇴. TODAY!!! 🥳
There will be two sets of drops to accommodate different timezones:
1⃣ 1600 UTC
2⃣ 2300 UTC
Get yourselves ready! https://t.co/gA11I9JH8x

转发：🎟️🎟️🎟️两波🌊. 门票销售。Devcon Bogotá🇨🇴. 今天！！！🥳
将有两组下降，以适应不同的时区：
1.⃣ 协调世界时1600
2.⃣ 2300 UTC
准备好！https://t.co/gA11I9JH8x

@EthCLWP @ArchivaldoETH Of course it's all happening at once!
Actual rollout will of course happen in separate hard forks, but the work of getting to the rollout is being done in parallel by different teams, and in some cases we don't even yet know the order that things will come in.

@当然，这一切都是同时发生的！
当然，实际的推出将在单独的硬分叉中进行，但实现推出的工作是由不同的团队并行完成的，在某些情况下，我们甚至还不知道事情的顺序。

RT: The third AllWalletDevs call is this Wednesday July 27th at 12:30 PM ET (4:30 PM UTC)!

转发：AllWalletDevs的第三个电话是本周三7月27日美国东部时间下午12:30（UTC下午4:30）！

RT: @argentHQ Merge + surge + verge + purge + splurge are not stages!
They are all happening in parallel.

转发：@argentHQ Merge+surge+verge+purge+splush不是阶段！
它们都是同时发生的。