@LakotaMan1 @andwerth He's launching like 4 or 5 rockets a month this year so far without any of them crashing. That's reality.

@LakotaMan1@andwerth他今年每个月发射4到5枚火箭，至今没有任何一枚火箭坠毁。这就是现实。

@thal0x It's not the gold standard. Steelcase Leap.

@这不是金本位。Steelcase Leap。

@DBistoli @FinchTH @PeterHotez https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/1...

@dbistoli@finchth@peterhotezhttps://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/1...

@ibrake4ants @DrEricDing @farid__jalali The report covered 12-18 months.

@ibrake4ants@drericing@farid__jalali该报告涵盖了12-18个月。

@wsbgnl @sleepyknave You're going to need the 25th amendment for that.
This was created, or at least timed, to unmask the state of the union. Decisions were made at the highest level.

@wsbgnl@sleepyknave你需要第25条修正案。
这是为了揭开美国的面纱而创建的，或者至少是在时间上。决策是在最高级别做出的。

@CapriciousNest @wsbgnl It was backward engineered to get something that would unmask in time for the state of the union.

@CapriciousNest@wsbgnl它是经过逆向设计的，目的是为了得到一些能够及时为国情咨文揭开面纱的东西。

@spicedrop71 @lisasolod @dianaberrent Apparently not.
But really, the information is unclear and ambiguous. Still plenty of shields up, businesses touting their "cleaning and sanitizing". It's a gauntlet of misinformation.

@spicedrop71@lisasolod@dianaberrent显然不是。
但事实上，这些信息并不清楚，也不明确。仍然有很多盾牌，商家们吹嘘他们的“清洁和消毒”。这是一系列错误信息。

@FinchTH "Human-to-human transmission is thought to occur primarily through large respiratory droplets, which generally cannot travel more than a few feet"
LOL

@FinchTH“人与人之间的传播被认为主要通过大型呼吸液滴发生，通常不能超过几英尺。”
英雄联盟

@AGoldsmithEsq @JoJoFromJerz You can drop cable entirely, and tell them why.

@AGoldsmithEsq@JoJoFromJerz您可以完全放下电缆，并告诉他们原因。

@lisasolod @dianaberrent More like being given bad information. Most people are not biologists or epidemiologists and shouldn't have to figure it all out on their own.

@lisasolod@dianaberrent更像是被提供了坏信息。大多数人都不是生物学家或流行病学家，不应该靠自己解决所有问题。

@thetrizzles @OliveSiffleur @wsbgnl There is a lot of bias in that chart, we can only guess where it is but probably some vulnerable populations being disproportionately unvaccinated. There is still significant efficacy but it's a lot less than that if you look at more careful studies.

@thetrizzles@OliveSiffleur@wsbgnl该图表中有很多偏见，我们只能猜测它在哪里，但可能一些弱势群体没有接种疫苗的比例过高。这仍然有显著的疗效，但如果你仔细研究的话，效果要小得多。

@dj1au @thetrizzles @OliveSiffleur @wsbgnl This is true but the RATE is still lower among vaccinated. It just isn't anywhere near as much lower as it used to be. The trend is in the wrong direction.

@dj1au@thetrizzles@OliveSiffleur@wsbgnl这是真的，但在接种疫苗的人群中，发病率仍然较低。现在已经没有以前那么低了。趋势是错误的。

@Marco_Piani Enough said about this nonsense from the "Professor of Medicine at Stanford". He'll emit more soon enough, we can move on to that.

@马尔科·皮亚尼（Marco_Piani）对“斯坦福大学医学教授”的胡说八道说得够多了。他很快就会释放更多，我们可以继续。

@Marco_Piani I mean the whole thing was being done at "warp speed". It's not like anything at all was planned years in advance.

@Marco_Piani我是说整个过程都是以“扭曲速度”完成的。这完全不像是提前几年计划好的。

@Marco_Piani I remember cities being added (or maybe moved, I don't remember) in real time because of high local spread.

@Marco_Piani我记得城市被实时添加（或者可能被移动，我不记得了），因为当地的传播率很高。

@Marco_Piani Also, challenge trials were planned but not needed because of easy access to "naturally-infected" people. But if everyone had been as successful as say Western Australia, we would have done that and it would have worked fine.

@Marco_Piani还计划了挑战性试验，但由于很容易接触到“自然感染”的人，因此不需要。但是，如果每个人都像西澳大利亚州那样成功，我们就会做到这一点，而且效果会很好。

@Marco_Piani Trolls like JB can't make any sort of logically consistent argument. Lockdowns don't work, but they're a beggar- thy-neighbor strategy when it comes to vaccines because...they do work?

@像JB这样的马尔科·皮亚尼巨魔无法提出任何逻辑上一致的论点。封锁不起作用，但在疫苗方面，它们是以邻为壑的策略，因为。。。他们真的有用吗？

@Marco_Piani Also true. There wasn't a need to test everywhere, but if there were, Australia could have been included, and would have produced useful data in practice.

@马尔科·皮亚尼也是如此。没有必要在任何地方进行测试，但如果有，澳大利亚本可以被包括在内，并在实践中产生有用的数据。

@Marco_Piani If you're not sure, you cast a wide net. As I recall, trials were planned on short notice in particular local areas that were having large outbreaks. That could have been done in Australia when large outbreaks happened if anyone wanted to. Wasn't a need.

@Marco_Piani如果你不确定，你就撒网了。我记得，试验计划是在短时间内进行的，特别是在发生大规模疫情的局部地区。如果有人愿意的话，当大规模疫情发生时，这本可以在澳大利亚实现。不需要。

@Marco_Piani No one could be sure of any particular case rate in advance, regardless of strategy. In mid 2020, many places in Europe and a few in the US had near-zero covid. You're not going to spread on purpose just to test vaccines!

@无论采取何种策略，没有人能够提前确定任何特定的病例率。2020年中期，欧洲的许多地方和美国的一些地方出现了接近零的新冠病毒。你不会只是为了测试疫苗而故意传播！