@ajaxsinger @chrislhayes 20% after 5 yeas. How many after 10 or 20? It is civilization-ending.
You stop transmission, no matter how hard that is to do. There is no other alternative.
IF that is the case. It may be. Choose wisely.
@5年后，ajaxsinger@chrislhayes 20%。10点或20点后有多少人？这是文明的终结。
你停止传播，不管这有多困难。别无选择。
如果是这样的话。可能是的。明智地选择。
@BehrAdam @chrislhayes It requires compliance from building owners, business, local schools, etc. That may well be harder. Schools were given billions of dollars and still many refused to do much at all or made ineffective improvements (buying non-working overpriced air cleaners).
@BehrAdam@chrislhayes它需要建筑业主、企业、当地学校等的遵守，这可能会更加困难。学校得到了数十亿美元，但仍有许多学校拒绝做很多事情，或做出了无效的改进（购买价格过高的非工作空气净化器）。
@laurifaloon @andersostlund https://t.co/z6Z851m2Sf
@安德索斯隆德洛里法隆酒店https://t.co/z6Z851m2Sf
@gregggonsalves The patient was probably invented, fortunately.
@幸运的是，病人很可能是发明出来的。
@PaulKaloper @wsbgnl Some of them were asked to do it. Others may have volunteered to self-promote.
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/pBz7YVjT36
@PaulKaloper@wsbgnl他们中的一些人被要求这样做。其他人可能自愿自我推销。
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/pBz7YVjT36
@KemonomichiNL @crystajenn @Noahpinion The artists go there to work even if they didn't start out there, so it is natural they would reference it. That's what cities are for, after all.
Arguing that cities shouldn't be centers of culture is a bit...odd.
@KemonomichiNL@crystajenn@Noahpinion艺术家们去那里工作，即使他们不是从那里开始的，所以他们自然会参考它。毕竟，城市就是为了这个。
认为城市不应该成为文化中心有点。。。古怪的
@RALee85 Dafuq that going to do against concrete?
@RALee85 Dafuq那对混凝土有什么影响？
@KemonomichiNL @crystajenn @Noahpinion There are only 17 movies listed in wikipedia as set in NY in 2019 (out of 700+ released). I'm sure the list isn't complete but I'm also not sure the complete list would be more than 40.
@KemonomichiNL@crystajenn@Noahpinion维基百科上只列出了以2019年纽约为背景的17部电影（共发行了700多部）。我确定名单不完整，但我也不确定完整的名单会超过40个。
@crystajenn @KemonomichiNL @Noahpinion Fox news does well with a few million or less viewership because the costs of a cable channel are extremely low.
@crystajenn@KemonomichiNL@Noahpinion Fox news拥有数百万或更少的收视率，因为有线电视频道的成本非常低。
@TWKsicem @joedonnellyiv @jeffmklein @whstancil LOL enjoy your weekend
@TWKsicem@joedonellyiv@jeffmklein@whstancil LOL祝你周末愉快
@TWKsicem @joedonnellyiv @jeffmklein @whstancil 110k per year (as a floor, reality will probably be higher for any one year window) is very high. It's is a leading cause of death, much higher than any other single virus.
It's not civilization-ending, but should prompt a serious rethink of how humans deal with viruses vs <2019
@TWKsicem@joedonnellyiv@jeffmklein@whstancil每年11万英镑（作为一个楼层，任何一年窗口的实际值都可能更高）非常高。它是导致死亡的主要原因，远远高于任何其他单一病毒。
这不是文明的终结，但应该促使人们认真反思人类如何应对病毒；2019
@TWKsicem @joedonnellyiv @jeffmklein @whstancil Fair
@TWKsicem@Joedonellyiv@jeffmklein@whstancil Fair
@TWKsicem @joedonnellyiv @jeffmklein @whstancil It wasn't my phrase but the current rates are not low.
What happened in the past doesn't change what is happening now either way.
@TWKsicem@joedonellyiv@jeffmklein@whstancil这不是我的话，但目前的利率并不低。
不管怎样，过去发生的事情都不会改变现在发生的事情。
@TWKsicem @joedonnellyiv @jeffmklein @whstancil Define high. US run rate is RIGHT NOW is 110k per year, which is a very high number for one virus. It's also very likely to be the low point for quite a while, as deaths were higher for the entire first four months of the year and are about to start increasing again.
@TWKsicem@Joedonellyiv@jeffmklein@whstancil定义高。美国目前的运行率是每年11万，这对于一种病毒来说是一个非常高的数字。这也很可能是相当长一段时间内的低点，因为今年头四个月的死亡率更高，并且即将再次开始增加。
@AZSyrinx @jwatte @BioTurboNick @jeffmklein @d_plainview_ @whstancil Also food prep. Who wants spit droplets in their food?
@AZSyrinx@jwatte@BioTurboNick@jeffmklein@d\u plainview\uu@whstancil还准备食物。谁想在食物中吐出水滴？
@EAlluia @jeffmklein @whstancil Vax mandates, albeit not hard ones (mostly vax pass or vax or test) are part of the reason vax uptake is much higher than booster uptake. The mandates never included boosters.
@EAlluia@jeffmklein@whstancil Vax指令，尽管不是硬性指令（主要是Vax通过或Vax或测试）是Vax摄取量远高于助推器摄取量的部分原因。这些授权从未包括支持者。
@drtrillionaire @DarenCotter @Spauldi55428511 @robinhanson Borrowing against assets is common. Of course true in real estate, but I can assure you that everyone with about 20M+ plus in assets of any kind (probably less) is being aggressively sold borrowing products, tax efficiency being part of the pitch.
@drtrillionaire@DarenCotter@Spauldi55428511@robinhanson用资产借款是很常见的。房地产行业当然如此，但我可以向你保证，所有拥有2000多万（可能更少）各类资产的人都在积极出售借贷产品，税收效率是其中的一部分。
@drtrillionaire @DarenCotter @Spauldi55428511 @robinhanson I have no idea of the number but it's significant at some level of "rich". Also, that's just one element of this. For literal billionaires >$1 million income (0.1%) is relatively easy, may well happen by accident, but lots with $10Ms or even $100Ms will not generate $1M taxable.
@drtrillionaire@DarenCotter@Spauldi55428511@robinhanson我不知道这个数字，但它在某种程度上是“富有”的。而且，这只是其中的一个因素。面向亿万富翁>$100万美元的收入（0.1%）相对容易，很可能是偶然发生的，但10亿美元甚至100亿美元的地块不会产生100万美元的应税收入。
@JuanSGalt @brucefenton That would be a soft fork in bitcoin anyway, which is nothing special.
@JuanSGalt@brucefenton这在比特币中算是个软叉，没什么特别的。