@Marco_Piani i.e. Just because you try to prevent spread, and do in fact have LESS spread, doesn't mean it won't happen in practice.

@Marco_Piani，也就是说，仅仅因为你试图防止传播，而且实际上传播得更少，并不意味着它在实践中不会发生。

@Marco_Piani Also, NSW had a major outbreak in 2021 if you wanted to continue testing (eg. boosters)
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Marco\u Piani同样，如果你想继续检测（如助推器），新南威尔士州在2021也发生了重大疫情
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Marco_Piani In mid 2020, the outbreak in Victoria reached similar population case rates as the US where (among other places) vaccines were being tested.

@Marco_Piani在2020年中期，维多利亚州的疫情达到了与美国相似的人口病例率，美国（以及其他地方）正在测试疫苗。

@Marco_Piani If I were to interpret his statement in the most charitable way possible, he's suggesting that vaccines couldn't be tested in Australia because of its strategy. But even this is wrong. Vaccine tests in Australia would have worked fine.

@Marco_Piani如果我以最仁慈的方式解释他的声明，他是在暗示，由于澳大利亚的战略，疫苗无法在澳大利亚进行测试。但即使这样也错了。在澳大利亚进行疫苗测试会很有效。

@Marco_Piani In this case, harsh IS fair.

@Marco_Piani在这种情况下，harsh是公平的。

@Marco_Piani How did the Australian covid strategy adversely impact neighbors in any way. If anything it helped neighbors by not spreading covid to them.
He's full of shit.

@马尔科·皮亚尼（Marco_Piani）澳大利亚新冠病毒策略对邻国有何负面影响。如果说有什么帮助的话，那就是不向邻居传播新冠病毒。
他全是狗屎。

@PetrosPetridis5 @juli_bg_bs @tskould https://www.makeuseof.com/23an...

@PetrosPetridis5@juli_bg_bs@tskouldhttps://www.makeuseof.com/23an...

@wsbgnl @sdbaral Evacuating when there is barely any breeze.

@wsbgnl@sdbaral在几乎没有微风的情况下撤离。

@bpa331 @gregggonsalves @JReinerMD @CNN The exceptions that prove the rule. Reiner might be literally the only one with a big mainstream platform.

@bpa331@gregggonsalves@JReinerMD@CNN证明该规则的例外情况。雷纳可能是唯一一个拥有大型主流平台的公司。

@CarolEzell7 @alexmeshkin The list of risk factors is enormous. Including being overweight or obese which by itself is most of the population.
For those with severe risk factors, you're correct. And it probably does do the most good there too.

@CarolEzell7@alexmeshkin风险因素的清单是巨大的。包括超重或肥胖，这本身就是人口中的大多数。
对于那些有严重风险因素的人，你是对的。而且它可能在那里也做得最好。

@juli_bg_bs @macroliter The psycho is rude but not wrong. Vaccines aren't preventing cases to a great degree and the reason @macroliter 's house is covid free is not vaccines. It's either luck or other precautions.

@juli_bg_bs@macrolel精神病患者很粗鲁，但没有错。疫苗并不能在很大程度上预防病例，而@Macroll’s house不含新冠病毒的原因不是疫苗。要么是运气，要么是其他预防措施。

@CarolEzell7 @alexmeshkin If you have another visit sure, but that's not a comprehensive solution. Most people don't, some don't have doctors at all. Good to do if you can though.

@CarolEzell7@alexmeshkin如果你有其他的访问，当然，但这不是一个全面的解决方案。大多数人没有，有些人根本没有医生。如果你可以的话，这很好。

@lm_vix @PeterHotez No

@lm_vix@PeterHotez No

@CarolEzell7 @alexmeshkin The idea that a horribly overburdened health system which doesn't even serve everybody is going to have everyone doing a visit (ever if virtual) "just in case" is not remotely practical.

@CarolEzell7@alexmeshkin认为，一个负担过重、甚至无法为所有人提供服务的卫生系统，会让所有人都去看医生（即使是虚拟的）“以防万一”，这种想法根本不现实。

@tcelltwerker @alexmeshkin He means you didn't need a visit and a prescription to get vaccinated.

@tcelltwerker@alexmeshkin他的意思是你不需要去看医生和开处方就可以接种疫苗。

@LazarusLong13 @beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @kvongoeler @drShaneLandry @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa @HuffmanLabDU @CAPPEM2 @PPEtoheros @masknerd The Denmark study supports masking too (weakly).

@LazarusLong13@beansprouts_mom@SimonAJoosten1@kvongoeler@drShaneLandry@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@brosseau_lisa@HuffmanLabDU@CAPPEM2@PPEtoheros@masknerd丹麦的研究也支持掩蔽（弱）。

@baselsalam @Spauldi55428511 @robinhanson It's not the gains themselves, it is that many asset rich people who don't have high taxable incomes won't be included at all. That's why it overrepresent operating businesses like car dealers and underrepresented investors.

@baselsalam@Spauldi55428511@robinhanson这不是收益本身，而是许多没有高应税收入的资产富人根本不包括在内。这就是为什么它在汽车经销商和代表性不足的投资者等运营企业中占据了过高的比例。

@StevenMathern @PlasticFull @SamJCauston @3M @rhysthomas They're very stable once assembled. The 3M filters have many more pleats than cheap ones, which provides high filtration surface area even in 1" filter vs. 2"

@StevenMatern@PlasticFull@Samjcouston@3M@Rhystomas他们组装后非常稳定。3M过滤器的褶皱比廉价过滤器多得多，即使在1英寸过滤器和2英寸过滤器中也能提供高过滤表面积

@RALee85 Dafuq 30mm going to do against a massive soviet era nuke-hardened concrete factory? 🤦

@RALee85 Dafuq 30mm将如何对抗苏联时期的大型核硬化混凝土工厂？🤦

@FinchTH But still completely deluded as to what to do about it.
https://twitter.com/chrislhaye...

@但仍然完全被蒙蔽，不知道该怎么办。
https://twitter.com/chrislhaye...