@KentonAntiques @apoorva_nyc Sorry to hear. Hope that improves.

@KentonAntiques@apoorva_nyc很抱歉听到这个消息。希望情况有所改善。

@KentonAntiques @apoorva_nyc Still probably "most" won't need care. It's just bad science writing.

@KentonAntiques@apoorva_nyc仍然可能“大多数”不需要护理。这只是糟糕的科学写作。

@thereal_truther They're just asking questions.

@他们只是在问问题。

@thereal_truther @DrJBhattacharya @MartinKulldorff To pay the bills

@thereal_truther@DrJBhattacharya@MartinKulldorff支付账单

@Lujan588 @myrtoashe @FinchTH @apoorva_nyc And guess what, those are the only experts that exist if you are in the information bubble that The Gray Lady presides over.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Lujan588@myrtoashe@FinchTH@apoorva_nyc，猜猜看，如果你身处灰色女士所主导的信息泡沫中，这些是唯一存在的专家。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123 "We" meaning people that The Newspaper Of Record does not consider Important Enough People to cite as sources.

@jklmd123“We”指的是记录在案的报纸认为不重要的人，不能作为来源引用。

@JeffCavanagh1 @windknot5181 Always two digit followers, funny that.

@JeffCavanagh1@windnot5181总是有两位数的粉丝，真有趣。

@EIDGeek @JeffCavanagh1 @DavidBa69494891 @apoorva_nyc @InfectiousDz We haven't had widely circulating diseases of anywhere near this significance in terms of short- and long-term mortality and morbidity for a very long time. People, and society, have forgotten what it is like and how to deal with it.

@EIDGeek@JeffCavanagh1@DavidBa69494891@apoorva_nyc@infectiviousdz长期以来，就短期和长期死亡率和发病率而言，我们还没有出现过类似意义的广泛传播疾病。人们和社会已经忘记了它是什么样子，以及如何应对它。

@rojamdmba @CarloCisco @EricNewcomer Someone has been swimming naked it seems. Inconvenient when the tide goes out.

@Rojamdba@CarloCisco@Eric似乎有人在裸泳。退潮时不方便。

@Lujan588 @myrtoashe @FinchTH @apoorva_nyc Many "experts" went along with a political narrative of getting to herd immunity as "The End" which made it seem like a scientific consensus but it really was a combination of wishful thinking, grifting, and groupthink.

@Lujan588@myrtoashe@FinchTH@apoorva_nyc许多“专家”赞同将群体免疫作为“终点”的政治叙事，这让它看起来像是一个科学共识，但实际上是一厢情愿、阴郁和集体思维的结合。

@apoorva_nyc I know what you're trying to say here but this is meaningless because most people w/o vax won't either.
"Most people who have received three or even just two doses will not become sick enough to need medical care if they test positive for the coronavirus"

@apoorva_nyc我知道你想说什么，但这毫无意义，因为大多数没有vax的人也不会。
“如果冠状病毒检测呈阳性，大多数接受过三剂甚至两剂的人不会生病需要医疗护理”

@rojamdmba @CarloCisco @EricNewcomer Allegedly Tiger leverages relationships with big consulting to scale analyzing and diligence. How much of that is real vs ass covering when doing S&P anyway (nobody gets fired for listening to McKinsey) I don't really know.

@Rojamdba@CarloCisco@EricNewcomer据称Tiger利用与大型咨询公司的关系来进行规模分析和尽职调查。这其中有多少是真实的，而不是在做S&；P不管怎样（没有人因为听麦肯锡而被解雇）我真的不知道。

@CarloCisco @rojamdmba @EricNewcomer I don't consider high revenue high growth to being particularly selective. Everybody wants that!
YC is selective in much more obscure ways (probably subjective), given that the stage mostly defies metrics.

@CarloCisco@Rojamdba@EricNewcomer我不认为高收入高增长是特别有选择性的。每个人都想要！
YC的选择方式更加模糊（可能是主观的），因为舞台大多不符合标准。

@simon_gordon_ What on earth are you talking about? Even at the current low point in daily rate, which will likely be going up shortly, annualized covid deaths are much higher than annual flu deaths. This is true even in South Korea with a 86% vax rate and 70% booster rate.

@西蒙·戈登你到底在说什么？即使在目前日均死亡率的低点（很快可能会上升），新冠肺炎的年死亡率也远高于流感的年死亡率。即使在vax率为86%、助推器率为70%的韩国也是如此。

@rojamdmba @CarloCisco @EricNewcomer You can't really do an index fund at the level of YC classes. Many have zero valuation until YC chooses them. YC is a price maker not a price taker.

@Rojamdba@CarloCisco@EricNewcomer你不可能真的在YC级别做指数基金。在YC选择之前，许多公司的估值为零。YC是价格制定者，而不是价格接受者。

@rojamdmba @CarloCisco @EricNewcomer Yeah I agree the expansion is a bit more spray. It's still selective though.

@Rojamdba@CarloCisco@Eric Newcomer是的，我同意扩张有点像喷雾。不过还是有选择性的。

@CarloCisco @rojamdmba @EricNewcomer YC is VERY selective

@CarloCisco@Rojamdba@Eric Newcomer YC非常挑剔

@CovidActNow Do better
https://twitter.com/JReinerMD/...

@新冠病毒现在做得更好了
https://twitter.com/JReinerMD/...

@emmagf Something something barn door.

@艾玛：谷仓的门。

@lalasoo @TheAngryEpi @eperea @roslemusmartin It's a comparison people like a lot but really a false equivalence. The scale is completely different, to a degree that makes a difference in kind. Violence would need to be at the scale of a world war to reach comparable magnitude.
Imagine downplaying a world war?

@lalasoo@TheAngryEpi@eperea@roslemusmartin这是一个人们非常喜欢的比较，但实际上是一个错误的对等。规模是完全不同的，在某种程度上造成了本质上的不同。暴力需要达到世界大战的规模才能达到类似的规模。
想象一下淡化一场世界大战？