用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息
@88thne @CenzoTrades @Mzterlexxy10 @ashwsbreal If they're lying then they're also not spending that BTC on LUNA
@88thne@CenzoTrades@mzterlexy10@ashwsbreal如果他们撒谎,那么他们也不会在LUNA上花费BTC
@helaineolen @DKThomp WFH isn't all about threat of covid.
@helaineolen@DKThomp WFH并不完全是关于新冠病毒的威胁。
@DKThomp @thehowie A small decline isn't inconsistent. Your chart shows a small decline in occupancy from 2019 as well (median is questionable given rise 2000->2019). But main point of much greater decline in subway/community stands regardless.
@DKThomp@thehowie的小幅下跌并不矛盾。您的图表显示,自2019年以来,入住率也有小幅下降(考虑到2000年至2019年的增长,中位数值得怀疑)。但地铁站/社区站数量大幅下降的主要原因是什么。
@KupariUsa @wendeeluvz It wouldn't shatter if you drove a tank over it.
@KupariUsa@wendeeluvz如果你把坦克开过去它就不会碎。
@medriva All those rural counties with no hospital still won't ever go red.
@梅德里瓦——所有那些没有医院的乡村县永远不会变红。
@mikejohansenmd @ZiikZiiii @alexmeshkin It was supposed to take two months and be ready in large quantity in March https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/1...
@mikejohansenmd@ZiikZiiii@alexmeshkin预计需要两个月的时间,并在3月份大量准备就绪https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/1...
@AGoldsmithEsq @alexmeshkin I think his comment was more about the "booster" label. It's become a liability (if it ever was not one).
@AGoldsmithEsq@Alexmeskin我认为他的评论更多的是关于“助推器”的标签。这已经成为一种负担(如果不是的话)。
@dogpatchryan @BillHanage In theory yeah, but in practice his advice has be severely numerically flawed. It's how to get covid advice packaged as how to not get covid.
If people are going to assess risk, they need good advice how to do so.
@dogpatchryan@BillHanage理论上是的,但实际上他的建议在数量上存在严重缺陷。这是如何将新冠病毒建议打包为如何不感染新冠病毒。
如果人们要评估风险,他们需要好的建议。
@BillHanage Discourse around a lot of things has been gravely ill for a long time.
@BillHanage围绕很多事情展开的讨论长期以来一直病入膏肓。
@ChristosArgyrop @ToshiAkima This was obvious in February 2020.
@ChristosArgyrop@ToshiAkima这在2020年2月是显而易见的。
@BillHanage Societal frame:
Not much is going to change without more evidence, so continued research critical. Find levers to advocate for and make improvement to reduce circulation within the range of the possible.
@BillHanage社会框架:
如果没有更多的证据,情况不会有多大变化,因此继续研究至关重要。找到鼓吹和改进的杠杆,在可能的范围内减少循环。
@BillHanage Individual frame:
Avoid exposure as well as you can for as long as possible until more evidence arrives. But it's really situation dependent. Many people can make reasonable choices to reduce exposure that they aren't making. Some can't.
@BillHanage单个帧:
尽可能长时间避免接触,直到有更多证据。但这确实取决于具体情况。许多人可以做出合理的选择来减少他们没有做的暴露。有些人不能。
@ToshiAkima @ChristosArgyrop There's a MAD logic to that.
@ToshiAkima@ChristosArgyrop有一个疯狂的逻辑。
@ChristosArgyrop https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@FinchTH "Human-to-human transmission is thought to occur primarily through large respiratory droplets, which generally cannot travel more than a few feet"
LOL
@圣诞老人https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@FinchTH“人与人之间的传播被认为主要通过大型呼吸液滴发生,通常不能超过几英尺。”
英雄联盟
@BillHanage The impact of lifelong debilitation is high enough that being precautionary without certainty or even high confidence of risk is perfectly reasonable. Indeed uncertainty itself calls for precaution.
@BillHanage终身衰弱的影响非常大,因此在没有确定性甚至对风险没有高度信心的情况下采取预防措施是完全合理的。事实上,不确定性本身就需要预防。
@Americanhope78 @DrEricDing Coronavirus is a broad family and they don't all have the same properties at all. For example MERS has a 30% fatality rate.
@Americanhope78@drericing冠状病毒是一个广泛的家族,它们的特性完全不同。例如,MERS的死亡率为30%。
@Americanhope78 @DrEricDing Not really. There are many different "cold" viruses, and most of them aren't even coronaviruses. Multiple colds per year is usually due to getting infected by different ones. It is possible to get infected by the same one after six months, but not common.
@美国人希望78@drericing不是真的。有许多不同的“感冒”病毒,其中大多数甚至不是冠状病毒。每年多发性感冒通常是由于感染了不同的感冒。六个月后可能感染同一种病毒,但并不常见。
@DrEricDing How does anyone know that it is a "small fraction" after 3rd, 4th or later infections?
@Drericing:在第三次、第四次或以后的感染后,人们怎么知道这是一个“小部分”?