@OmicronData @lisaandco @KrauthBen Okay, if 70% is before then 30% is after. So reducing contacts after a positive test still probably reduces transmission. Worthless is taking it too far. More like worth less.

@OmicronData@lisaandco@KrauthBen好的，如果70%在之前，那么30%在之后。因此，在阳性检测后减少接触仍然可能会减少传播。毫无价值就是走得太远了。更像是一文不值。

@OmicronData @lisaandco @KrauthBen Also, not sure about generalizing from averages in this manner.

@OmicronData@lisaandco@KrauthBen，也不确定是否以这种方式从平均值中进行概括。

@OmicronData @lisaandco @KrauthBen "Worthless" depends how many infections happen after 4.5 days.

@[email protected]“感染后多少天”发生。

@wsbgnl One million = 600k since the elaborate reflecting pool ceremony for 400k.

@wsbgnl 100万=60万，因为精心设计的40万人反思池仪式。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave In a purely theoretical sense, it could have gone that way, but global right wing groups were always pushing herd immunity strategies, lack of mitigations, etc. Trump was likely influenced as much as the influencer.

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave从纯粹的理论意义上讲，它本可以走这条路，但全球右翼团体一直在推行群体免疫策略，缺乏缓解措施等。特朗普可能受到的影响和影响者一样大。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave None and all.

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave None and all。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave India deaths are wildly underreported, and probably more like 5 million. Yes, US has way too many deaths (and ongoing) for a high income country that was supposedly best prepared to handle a pandemic.

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave India的死亡人数被严重低估，可能超过500万。是的，对于一个高收入国家来说，美国有太多的死亡病例（而且还在继续），而这个国家被认为是应对大流行的最佳准备。

@notlikethecomet @ggronvall Mitigations measures certainly aren't being followed and they were never that great mostly places ever.

@与Comet@ggronvall不同的是，缓解措施肯定没有得到遵守，而且它们从来没有像现在这样伟大。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave Global influence of right wing groups is a better assessment. Perhaps "GOP" is reasonable shorthand in that sense. Agree about US deaths and low vax rate, still much of the situation (large surges with reduced vax efficacy) is global.

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave右翼团体的全球影响力是一个更好的评估。从这个意义上说，“共和党”或许是合理的缩写。同意美国的死亡率和低vax率，但大多数情况（大幅度激增，vax疗效降低）是全球性的。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave Blaming "the GOP" is kind of silly since the situation is much the same globally (excluding China, different situation there).

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave指责“共和党”有点傻，因为全球情况基本相同（不包括中国，那里的情况不同）。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave It became possible to estimate reduction in hospitalization and death only by observation in the population. These were high as well, though have declined with variants and probably somewhat due to waning as well.

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave只有通过观察人群才能估计住院率和死亡率的降低。这一比例也很高，但随着变异而下降，而且可能也在某种程度上由于衰退。

@BillStewart415 @SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave No! Per trials they (mRNA) were 95% effective against symptomatic disease (i.e. covid). That is the basis on which they were authorized.
It wasn't possible to measure efficacy against hospitalization and death because the trials were too small for that.

@BillStewart415@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave No！根据试验，它们（mRNA）对症状性疾病（即新冠病毒）的有效率为95%。这是他们获得授权的基础。
由于试验规模太小，无法衡量住院治疗和死亡的疗效。

@wsbgnl Wait,what? Is community levels starting to not be all green?
Countdown to new metrics begins, NOW...

@等等什么？社区层面开始不是全绿色了吗？
新指标的倒计时开始了，现在。。。

@SherrisView @kentonagbone @Beezer2000 @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave (The word COVID stands for COrona VIrus Disease)

@SherrisView@kentonagbone@Beezer2000@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave（新冠病毒一词代表冠状病毒病）

@SherrisView @kentonagbone @Beezer2000 @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave Covid is the disease. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus. If you have covid you have the disease.

@SherrisView@kentonagbone@Beezer2000@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave Covid就是这种疾病。SARS-CoV-2就是这种病毒。如果你有新冠病毒，你就有这种疾病。

@SherrisView @farid__jalali @MLS_Dave The endpoint of the vaccine trials was literally contracting (symptomatic) covid.
"never claimed" is a lie.
Vaccines still strongly risk reduce severe disease and death. Get vaccines. But don't lie about history.

@SherrisView@farid__jalali@MLS_Dave疫苗试验的终点实际上是感染（症状性）新冠病毒。
“从未声称”是谎言。
疫苗仍然具有降低严重疾病和死亡的巨大风险。接种疫苗。但不要对历史撒谎。

@AstorAaron @Fyodor32768 A good surgical fitting well can be effective. I even saw an instance where it passed a fit test! But this is very unusual of course. But with reasonable fit probably >0.

@AstorAaron@Fyodor32768良好的手术配合可能会很有效。我甚至看到过一个例子，它通过了健康测试！但这当然是非常不寻常的。但合身程度可能合理>；0

@AstorAaron @Fyodor32768 They vary a lot. Some are terrible to breathe and the soft ones are generally more comfortable (subjective I guess) than the hard shell. I can't feel and difference breathing with or without a VFlex, and Aura is close. Auras are easy to find, VFlex more obscure.

@AstorAaron@Fyodor32768它们变化很大。有些很难呼吸，软的比硬的更舒服（我想是主观的）。无论是否使用VFlex，我都无法感觉和区分呼吸，而且灵气很近。光环很容易找到，VFlex则更模糊。

@AstorAaron @Fyodor32768 BTW the bigger issue with the picture is not the strap it is the nose clip. Enormous opening there.

@AstorAaron@Fyodor32768顺便说一句，这张照片更大的问题不是皮带，而是鼻子夹。巨大的开口。

@AstorAaron @Fyodor32768 I agree. Even without mandates meaning everyone wearing one is doing so voluntarily, probably >50% of what I see is clearly being used wrong. Nevertheless this doesn't mean someone who tries can't do so correctly and effectively.

@AstorAaron@Fyodor32768我同意。即使没有授权，也可能意味着每个人都是自愿佩戴的>；我所看到的有50%显然是用错了。然而，这并不意味着尝试的人不能正确有效地做到这一点。