用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@robwiss Nice work. Note that CFM/dBA is a very odd metric since dBA is a log scale. Twice the CFM with +3 dBA might be considered similar. Low or medium > high.

@罗伯斯干得不错。请注意,CFM/dBA是一个非常奇怪的指标,因为dBA是一个对数刻度。两倍于+3 dBA的CFM可能被认为是类似的。低或中等>;高的

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk Interestingly, at least one the documents specifically mentions shutting down transit. That was not done anywhere, although it was suggested. Tradeoffs too severe.

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk有趣的是,至少有一份文件特别提到关闭运输。尽管有人建议这样做,但在任何地方都没有这样做。权衡太过严厉。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk We can say that tradeoffs made were incorrect, but that doesn't mean tradeoffs weren't being made. They absolutely were, for example, the often-expansive definitions of exempt "essential businesses".

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk我们可以说做出的权衡是不正确的,但这并不意味着没有做出权衡。例如,它们绝对是免税“基本业务”的扩展定义。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk Cities were not shut down. Specific activities (theaters, parks, etc.) were shut down, just as described in the document.
"they talk about balancing the economic and social effects of mitigations"
Exactly, which should tell you that measures may be costly.

@villagerssn@Debunk__Funk城市并未关闭。具体活动(剧院、公园等)如文件所述被关闭。
“他们谈论平衡缓解措施的经济和社会影响”
没错,这应该告诉你,这些措施可能代价高昂。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk Also, not the same things, they're different sections of every document you come up with. It's in all of them because it has always been part of any plausible pandemic planning. This doesn't mean, of course, that any or every measure would be used in any instance. Tradeoffs ofc.

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk也不是同一件事,它们是你提出的每个文档的不同部分。所有这些都是因为它一直是任何看似合理的大流行规划的一部分。当然,这并不意味着在任何情况下都会使用任何或每种度量。权衡ofc。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk What was implemented is exactly what is in those documents. NPIs based on assessment of critical infrastructure, economic tradeoffs, etc. (btw, the term "social distancing" there is used to describe these measures such as school closures, not just physical distance)

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk所实施的正是这些文件中的内容。NPI基于对关键基础设施、经济权衡等的评估(顺便说一句,“社会距离”一词用于描述这些措施,如学校关闭,而不仅仅是物理距离)

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk I'm not sure what "massive lockdowns" you think happened in the US. Were there checkpoints? People welded into their homes?
A lot of businesses, schools, etc were closed just like those documents talk about. Just like what happened in 1918. Nothing new here.

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk我不确定你认为美国发生了什么“大规模封锁”。有检查站吗?人们焊接在他们的家里?
许多企业、学校等都像那些文件所说的那样关闭了。就像1918年发生的那样。这里没什么新鲜事。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk Parks, churches, theaters, mass gatherings, etc.
None of this is new. https://t.co/Srqll2pk61

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk公园、教堂、剧院、群众集会等。
这些都不是新鲜事。https://t.co/Srqll2pk61

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk "closure of schools" "disrupt business continuity" etc.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk Not really any different https://t.co/4v8dlZNAuE

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@villagerssn@Debunk_Funk“关闭学校”“中断业务连续性”等。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk其实没什么不同https://t.co/4v8dlZNAuE

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk Not really any different https://t.co/4v8dlZNAuE

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk其实没什么不同https://t.co/4v8dlZNAuE

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk I didn't work at all, I looked for NPI, pretty easy.

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funk我根本没工作,我找NPI,很简单。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Gab_H_R Is there evidence he ever did?

@Gab_H__R有证据证明他做过吗?

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@bedward36141403 @kvongoeler @drShaneLandry @beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa Different as measured there but both of those are quite high. Assuming untested=fail would be very wrong.

@bedward36141403 @kvongoeler @drShaneLandry @beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa 在那里测量的不同,但两者都相当高。假设 untested=fail 是非常错误的。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk https://t.co/gmizbZ2pr1

@villagerssn@Debunk_the_Funkhttps://t.co/gmizbZ2pr1

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrPieterPeach @LettersfromTim Mild qualification (not necessarily realistic): If every desk does it, probably effective.

@DrPieterPeach@LettersfromTim轻度限定(不一定现实):如果每个办公桌都这样做,可能会有效。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl Overall 49-42

@wsbgnl总比分49-42

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Cryptolyx @tolstoybb 😂

托尔斯泰😂

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@kvongoeler @drShaneLandry @beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa If it is labeled that way, it's wrong, yes.

@kvongoeler@drShaneLandry@beansprouts_mom@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@brosseau_lisa如果标签是这样的,那就是错的,是的。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Castdeath97 @BillHanage I think the tweet was more about mainland, but somewhat guessing.

@Castdeath97@BillHanage我觉得这条推文更多的是关于大陆的,但有些猜测。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Castdeath97 @BillHanage I'm not sure you can generalize just based on solely guidance. Different societies, different histories, different economics, etc. Maybe be helpful though, can't rule out.

@Castdeath97@BillHanage我不确定你能仅仅根据指导来概括。不同的社会、不同的历史、不同的经济等等,可能会有所帮助,但不能排除。

发表时间:1年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情