@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas And without distributed column reconstruction, you would need centralized column reconstruction, which requires someone to get all the rows.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas，如果没有分布式列重建，则需要集中的列重建，这需要有人获取所有行。
用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas Because with KZG you can reconstruct not only a row, but also a column (including proofs), because proofs are linear in the polynomial.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas，因为使用KZG不仅可以重建行，还可以重建列（包括证明），因为证明在多项式中是线性的。
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas The biggest weakness of Verkle+SNARK, aside from complexity, is that it's not friendly to distributed builders and distributed self-healing in the way that KZG uniquely is.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas除了复杂性之外，Verkle+SNARK最大的缺点是它对分布式构建器和分布式自愈不友好，不像KZG那样独特。
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas Actually now that I think about it, no!
We have thought about Merkle+STARK as the post-quantum backup but not Verkle+SNARK.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas实际上现在我想起来了，不！
我们认为Merkle+STARK是量子后的后备，但不是Verkle+SNARK。
Ultimately I agree with this (that is, I oppose banning PoW). The government picking and choosing which specific applications are an okay use of electricity or not is a bad idea. Better to just implement carbon pricing, and use some of the revenues to compensate low-income users. https://twitter.com/brucefento...
No government has the right to tell you what software to run.
Code is speech. https://twitter.com/nic__carte...
最终我同意这一点（也就是说，我反对禁止战俘）。政府挑选并选择哪些具体应用是可以用电还是不可以用电是个坏主意。更好的做法是实施碳定价，并将部分收入用于补偿低收入用户。https://twitter.com/brucefento...
任何政府都无权告诉你运行什么软件。
代码就是语音。https://twitter.com/nic__carte...
Of course, in the absence of perfect compensation of externalities (ie. the status quo today), we still have moral responsibilities.
当然，在缺乏对外部性的完美补偿（即今天的现状）的情况下，我们仍然有道德责任。
@0x_musty Yanukovych has not been in Kyiv for a while, no?
@0x\u发霉的亚努科维奇已经有一段时间没来基辅了，不是吗？
@iamwhoisme Dude the OP tokens that everyone is trading now were AIRDROPPED. It's a GIFT. Not sure where this sense of entitlement is coming from.
@我是老兄，现在每个人都在交易的OP代币都被空投了。这是一份礼物。不知道这种权利感是从哪里来的。
@ne0liberal SSC tried!
https://slatestarcodex.com/201... https://t.co/AqHpsja8SF
@NE0Freedor SSC已尝试！
https://slatestarcodex.com/201...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/AqHpsja8SF
@HirenKhasakiya Because we don't want half of Ukraine to turn into a hellish Reichskommissariat where stuff like this keeps happening:
https://kyivindependent.com/un...
@HirenKhasakiya，因为我们不想让乌克兰的一半变成地狱般的帝国主义者，在那里这样的事情不断发生：
https://kyivindependent.com/un...
100 дней этой злобной войны. https://twitter.com/Ukraine/st...
100 days ago Russia aimed to destroy us in a matter of days. Today, we keep standing tall and destroying the invaders.
Keep supporting Ukraine!
We will prevail 🇺🇦✊🏼
#StandWithUkraine #ArmUkraineNOW
art by Nikita Titov https://t.co/lLQrKfyJAs
这场恶战的100天。https://twitter.com/Ukraine/st...
100天前，俄罗斯打算在几天内摧毁我们。今天，我们继续挺身而出，消灭入侵者。
继续支持乌克兰！
我们将获胜🇺🇦✊🏼
#与乌克兰站在一起#ArmUkraineNOW
尼基塔·蒂托夫的艺术作品https://t.co/lLQrKfyJAs
@icy_apes @optimismPBC The sequencer is going to decentralize over time. I'm pretty sure all the major ethereum L2s have plans in that direction.
@icy\u apes@optimismPBC随着时间的推移，定序器将分散化。我很确定所有主要的以太坊L2都有这方面的计划。
@icy_apes @optimismPBC As far as I can tell, the financial value prop of the token comes from MEV revenues and L2 congestion fees.
@据我所知，icy\u apes@optimismPBC代币的财务价值支柱来自MEV收入和L2拥堵费。
@icy_apes @optimismPBC If "fiduciary duty" means "you have a duty to make profit maximization your only goal", then fiduciary duty is an evil concept and we have a moral duty to rebel against it, regardless of legality.
Fortunately I don't think the law says anything like "you have to profit-maximize"
@Ici\u apes@optimimpbc如果“受托责任”的意思是“你有责任让利润最大化成为你的唯一目标”，那么受托责任是一个邪恶的概念，我们有道德责任去反抗它，不管它是否合法。
幸运的是，我认为法律并没有说“你必须实现利润最大化”
Overview of Optimism two-house governance:
https://community.optimism.io/...
Overview of why I'm anti token-holder-centric governance:
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
两院治理概述：
https://community.optimism.io/...
我为什么反对以令牌持有人为中心的治理概述：
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
This is a great example of why I'm so proud of @optimismPBC for adding non-token governance (the Citizen House).
Optimism explicitly has goals *other* than just "make OP go up", and the only way to do that long-term is with explicit representation of non-token-holder interests. https://t.co/vofVVx53mC
这是一个很好的例子，说明了为什么@optimsmpbc添加了非令牌治理（公民之家）让我如此自豪。
乐观主义明确地有目标*而不仅仅是“让OP上升”，实现这一长期目标的唯一方法是明确表示非代币持有人的利益。https://t.co/vofVVx53mC
@paulg I do this!
Also, when I'm editing (code or text) and I need to jump to some other section but I know I will need to jump back, I put the word "moose" somewhere, so I can ctrl+F for it easily when I need to get back.
@paulg我做这个！
此外，当我在编辑（代码或文本）时，我需要跳转到其他部分，但我知道我需要跳回，我会将“moose”一词放在某个地方，以便在需要返回时可以轻松地按住ctrl+F组合键。
@AminCad @LT70000 I listed the taxes in descending order of how much I like them. So we don't disagree!
@AminCad@LT70000我按我喜欢的程度降序列出了税款。所以我们不反对！
@FrankDashwood23 @theCryptosopher Watch the Ropsten testnet do it with us in 6 days!
@FrankDashwood23@theCryptosopher观看Ropsten测试网在6天内与我们一起完成！
@theCryptosopher Lol no. Bitcoin being the only major chain to stick to PoW is like the opposite of my suggestion of offering olive branches.
@theCryptosopher Lol no.比特币是唯一坚持PoW的主链，这与我提出的提供橄榄枝的建议正好相反。