@SpencrGreenberg We should be more worried than we are today that "ok boomer" is ageist and is making boomers feel unwelcome.

@SpencrGreenberg我们应该比现在更担心的是，“正常婴儿潮一代”是年龄歧视，让婴儿潮一代感到不受欢迎。

@kevinsekniqi @Corpetty @el33th4xor @CollinCusce Because the level of economic security is much higher when attackers can lose not just potential gains but also their principal.

@kevinsekniqi@Corpetty@el33th4xor@Collincuse，因为当攻击者不仅可能失去潜在收益，还可能失去本金时，经济安全水平要高得多。

@accretionist @Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife I do think that it was true in 2014 that "the more moderate libertarians criticize corporations too, the more aggressive ones focus entirely on gov", but in 2022 as far as I can tell that's not true anymore.

@吸积主义者@Suitpossum@第三方生活我确实认为，2014年“更温和的自由主义者也批评公司，更激进的人完全专注于政府”，但在2022年，据我所知，这不再是事实。

@accretionist @Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife I don't even just mean the level-headed Canadian libertarians. I mean.... Bitcoiners. Including the aggressive and not very sane ones. Lots of anti-corporate sentiment, especially when we're talking about the banking system.

@我指的不仅仅是头脑冷静的加拿大自由主义者。我是说。。。。比特币制造者。包括那些好斗和不太理智的人。很多反公司情绪，尤其是当我们谈论银行系统时。

@accretionist @Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife That's what I mean! The libertarians I listen to attack corps all the time. Occasionally they even have to hear *from the outside* the point that sometimes bad stuff the banks do is actually a result of them having to comply with government regulations.

@增值主义者@Suitpossum@第三方生活这就是我的意思！自由主义者我一直在听攻击团的话。有时，他们甚至不得不从外部听到这样一个观点，即有时银行所做的坏事实际上是他们不得不遵守政府法规的结果。

@Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife Ok I think the libertarians you listen to are different from the libertarians I listen to.

@Suitpossum@3rdPartyLife好吧，我想你听的自由主义者和我听的自由主义者是不同的。

@Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife How is the concern in any way selective? I've heard of lots of criticism of the existing commercial banking system on privacy issues.

@Suitepossum@3rdPartyLife这种关注在任何方面都是有选择性的？我听说很多人批评现有的商业银行系统的隐私问题。

@dirac_sol But then you're minting coins without corresponding liabilities, and eventually your stablecoin turns into terra.

@dirac\u sol，但是你在铸造没有相应责任的硬币，最终你的马厩变成了terra。

@gatnash Do you happen to know of a good introduction to islamic economics?

@盖特纳什你知道一个很好的伊斯兰经济学入门吗？

@NathanpmYoung Opinions on ethical values.
"Valuing the welfare of citizens of your own country 100x higher than people on the other side of the world is wrong and bad" doesn't really come with predictions.

@NathanPmeung对道德价值观的看法。
“把自己国家的公民的福利比世界另一边的人高出100倍，这是错误的，也是不好的”并不是真的有这样的预测。

@pourteaux People do have a natural reason to invest at least some locally: if you're _just_ a renter, then you're negatively exposed to your city's economic well-being (through rent prices, and proxies to other people's rent eg. prices in restaurants), so you want to compensate for that

@pourteaux人有一个自然的理由至少在当地投资一些东西：如果你只是一个租客，那么你会对你所在城市的经济状况产生负面影响（通过租金价格和其他人的租金代理，例如餐馆的价格），所以你想对此进行补偿

@pourteaux This is a big part of why I support some kind of city coin (or for now just get a city-specific REIT)
You get wealth building, economic alignment with the place you live, but low hassle and more flexibility.

@pourteaux这是我为什么支持某种城市货币的一个重要原因（或者现在只需要获得一个特定于城市的REIT）
你可以积累财富，经济上与你居住的地方保持一致，但麻烦少，灵活性强。

RT: L1s do not assume majority correctness.
a full node rejects invalid state transitions signed by the majority
why won’t this cursed meme die https://twitter.com/kevinsekni...

转发：L1不假定多数正确性。
完整节点拒绝由多数签名的无效状态转换
为什么这个被诅咒的模因不会死https://twitter.com/kevinsekni...

@tszzl I do think that the morale effect of realizing that Elon could take over twitter if he wanted to still carries over somewhat even if it never happens. In which case I guess this prediction may turn out very correct, because the other effects equal zero 🤣
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@Tzzle我确实认为，如果埃隆想继续接管推特，即使这种情况从未发生，他也可以接管推特，这会对士气产生一定的影响。在这种情况下，我想这个预测可能会非常正确，因为其他效应等于零🤣
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

Go through this list (it's from https://slatestarcodex.com/201...), and keep track of how many items elicit a positive emotional gut response in you, and how many elicit a negative one (if truly neutral, count as 0.5 for both).
How many negative responses did you get? (poll in next tweet) https://t.co/FVYoJF3u8k

浏览此列表（来自https://slatestarcodex.com/201...)，并记录有多少项目能激发你积极的情绪直觉反应，有多少项目能激发消极的情绪直觉反应（如果真的是中性的，则两者都算作0.5）。
你得到了多少负面回应？（在下一条推文中投票）https://t.co/FVYoJF3u8k

Poll (see above tweet for context)

民意调查（请参见上面的推文了解上下文）

Go through this list (it's from https://slatestarcodex.com/201...), and keep track of how many items elicit a positive emotional gut response in you, and how many elicit a negative one (if truly neutral, count as 0.5 for both).
How many positive responses did you get? (poll in next tweet) https://t.co/qjtUqKi1Mn

浏览此列表（来自https://slatestarcodex.com/201...)，并记录有多少项目能激发你积极的情绪直觉反应，有多少项目能激发消极的情绪直觉反应（如果真的是中性的，则两者都算作0.5）。
你得到了多少积极的回应？（在下一条推文中投票）https://t.co/qjtUqKi1Mn

Poll (see above tweet for context)

民意调查（请参见上面的推文了解上下文）

@inudreamu Nah, WW3 may kill 1-2b (mostly from food supply chain disruption) if it's really bad, it won't kill off humanity. A bad AI could truly kill off humanity for good.

@第三次世界大战可能导致120亿人死亡（主要是由于食品供应链中断），如果情况真的很糟糕，它不会杀死人类。一个糟糕的AI真的可以永远消灭人类。

Unfriendly-AI risk continues to be probably the biggest thing that could seriously derail humanity's ascent to the stars over the next 1-2 centuries. Highly recommend more eyes on this problem. https://twitter.com/MIRIBerkel...

不友好的人工智能风险可能仍然是未来1-2个世纪可能严重阻碍人类升天的最大因素。强烈建议更多关注此问题。https://twitter.com/MIRIBerkel...