@epolynya Your twittering really is highly appreciated.

@epolynya非常感谢您的推特。

@NeerajKA @UnterseeS Yeah, the Finno-Korean hyper war was tough; lots of incredibly advanced civilizations died out in that one.

@NeerajKA@UnterseeS是的，芬朝超级战争很艰难；许多极其先进的文明在那一次中消亡了。

@glenweyl > econ theory does not use communication constraints almost at all at present
Isn't the individual choice assumption a pretty extreme assumption about communication constraints?

@glenweyl>；经济理论目前几乎完全没有使用通信约束
个人选择假设不是关于沟通约束的一个非常极端的假设吗？

@pourteaux The peace equilibrium collapsed for lots of specific reasons, eg. we can blab about how liberalism/-tarianism undervalues network effects etc etc. But the bigger picture is that peace equilibriums are fragile and always eventually fall apart for some reason.

@pourteaux和平平衡崩溃有很多具体原因，例如，我们可以吹嘘自由主义/人道主义如何低估网络效应等。但更大的图景是，和平平衡是脆弱的，并且总是由于某种原因最终崩溃。

@pourteaux "Authoritarianism" can be viewed as merely a fighting tactic: it's the name for the type of fighting where you try to push local political institutions to hammer down hard on the other side.
So when fighting as a whole is low, desire for authoritarianism is low.

@波尔图的“威权主义”可以被看作仅仅是一种战斗战术：它是一种战斗类型的名称，你试图迫使当地政治机构对另一方进行严厉打击。
因此，当战斗总体上很低时，对威权主义的渴望就很低。

@pourteaux Conflict was low-level, and when conflict is low-level it's easier to focus on nice fluffy things like principles, freedom, openness, debating fine points of moral philosophy, saving the whales, etc.

@波尔图的冲突是低级的，当冲突是低级的时，更容易把注意力集中在诸如原则、自由、开放、辩论道德哲学的精髓、拯救鲸鱼等琐碎的事情上。

@pourteaux Everything we're seeing this year is historically normal. The historical norm is not a nice place at all. Now what was special about the bright 1990-2015 era? Basically, peace. Both within the US and globally.

@波尔图我们今年看到的一切都是历史上正常的。历史规范根本不是一个好地方。那么，光明的1990-2015年时代有什么特别之处呢？基本上是和平。无论是在美国国内还是全球。

@pourteaux Thought about this overnight. I think there's something much higher-level going on.
Basically, my (low confidence) thesis is that we're not entering some new unprecedented epoch; rather, it's the ~1990-2015 era that was an exceptional era, and we're regressing to the mean.

@波尔图一夜之间就想到了这一点。我认为有更高层次的事情正在发生。
基本上，我（信心不足）的论点是，我们没有进入一个前所未有的新时代；相反，1990-2015年是一个特殊的时代，我们正在回归到平均水平。

@adietrichs @Bananaplanet2 I don't think we need to enshrine ERC 4337 in its entirety; as I talk about in the post, at most we really only need to enshrine a partial interface, which many kinds of improvements or alternatives to ERC 4337 would be compatible with.

@adietrichs@Bananaplanet2我认为我们不需要将ERC 4337全部奉为神圣；正如我在帖子中所说的，我们最多只需要包含一个部分接口，ERC 4337的许多改进或替代方案都可以与之兼容。

@barrybritmarcel @songadaymann Maersk should probably use a @StarkWareLtd validium.
It's actually a really underrated option for a lot of "enterprise blockchain" use cases imo.

@barrybritmarcel@SongadaymannMaersk可能应该使用@StarkWareLtd validium。
事实上，对于许多“企业区块链”用例来说，这是一个被低估的选项。

RT: @songadaymann Correction: I hold *ethereum* to a higher standard.
Random scammy centralized chains can do whatever they want, they'll have to answer for that themselves
(though I reserve the right to use them as examples of what I stand against, much as I do with centralized institutions)

RT：@songadaymann更正：我认为以太坊达到了更高的标准。
随机欺诈的集中链可以做任何他们想做的事，他们必须自己负责
（尽管我保留使用它们作为我反对的例子的权利，就像我对中央机构所做的那样）

@songadaymann Correction: I hold *ethereum* to a higher standard.
Random scammy centralized chains can do whatever they want, they'll have to answer for that themselves
(though I reserve the right to use them as examples of what I stand against, much as I do with centralized institutions)

@songadaymann 更正：我认为 *ethereum* 的标准更高。
随机诈骗中心化链可以为所欲为，他们必须自己回答
（尽管我保留使用它们作为我所反对的例子的权利，就像我对集中式机构所做的那样）

@barrybritmarcel @songadaymann https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@barrybritmarcel@songadaymannhttps://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@songadaymann At least with crypto we have *some* building blocks to protect our autonomy and try to build state-independent institutions.
And non-crypto billionaires waste huge piles of money on yachts too. I criticize crypto because I hold it to a higher standard.

@songadaymann至少在加密技术方面，我们有一些构建块来保护我们的自治权，并试图建立国家独立机构。
非加密亿万富翁也在游艇上浪费了大量的钱。我批评加密技术，因为我坚持更高的标准。

@songadaymann The fact that I'm even more critical of lots of non-crypto things going on in the world is also lost on people.
Point to *one* big-country (>100m) government in the world today that we can be proud of. I don't see any.

@songadaymann事实上，我对世界上发生的许多非加密的事情更加挑剔，这也让人们感到困惑。
指出当今世界上“一个”大国（>；1亿）的政府，我们可以为此感到骄傲。我什么也没看到。

@pourteaux Do you have your own theories / explanations / mental models of why the shift to authoritarianism (on the right and the left, as your earlier tweet alluded) happened?
(I don't mean moral justifications; stuff happening in politics for terrible reasons is normal)

@你有没有自己的理论/解释/心理模型来解释为什么会发生向威权主义的转变（正如你之前的推文所暗示的，在左右两侧）？
（我指的不是道德上的正当理由；政治上发生的事情出于可怕的原因是正常的）

A doc on a possible path to build on our account abstraction work with ERC-4337 (and ERC-3074 if desired) and add more protocol-enshrined features to make abstraction the default over time.
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb...
Thanks for comments @yoavw @adietrichs @lightclients!

在我们的帐户抽象基础上构建的可能路径上的文档与ERC-4337（以及ERC-3074，如果需要）一起工作，并添加更多包含协议的功能，以使抽象随着时间的推移成为默认。
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb。。。
感谢您的评论@yoavw@adietrichs@lightclients！

@danrobinson They want PoW to be the ultimate top dog, the casper FFG style of hybrid makes PoS the ultimate top dog and PoW a mere helper, whereas the older hybrid PoS ideas make PoW and PoS equal co top dog, so it's less risky politically.

@danrobinson他们希望PoW成为最终的顶级犬，casper FFG风格的杂交犬使PoS成为最终的顶级犬，而PoW只是一个帮手，而较旧的杂交PoS理念使PoW和PoS成为共同的顶级犬，因此政治风险较小。

@bryan_caplan @amazon @JeffBezos I think things are improving.
Eg. this government tweet below is truly vile, actually celebrating harms to innocent people caused by their policies.
But the savage response and ratio it's getting on Twitter is heartening, and hopefully made them think
https://mobile.twitter.com/TSA...

@bryan_caplan@amazon@JeffBezos我认为情况正在改善。
下面这条政府推特真的很卑鄙，实际上是在庆祝他们的政策对无辜人民造成的伤害。
但推特上的野蛮反应和比率令人振奋，希望能让他们思考
https://mobile.twitter.com/TSA...

@presidentbison @hasufl @danrobinson @dogemos Proof of stake gets even more secure when the yield drops. And since then, it has!

@当收益率下降时，presidentbison@hasufl@danrobinson@dogemos的股权证明更加安全。从那时起，它已经！