用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息

@Aella_Girl I do have the impression that this has gotten significantly worse over the past 10 years.

@Aella_Girl我确实有这样的印象,在过去的10年里,情况变得更糟了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Aella_Girl Related:
Most people do not act on principle.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Mac...

Most anti-X (where X is a certain conduct) are instances of anti-out-group who happens to have done X

发表时间:4年前 作者:Bruno Maçães @MacaesBruno

@Aella_女孩相关:
大多数人不按原则行事。
https://mobile.twitter.com/Mac...

大多数反X(其中X是一种特定行为)都是碰巧做过X的反out团体的例子

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux Hmm I guess I already mentally interpret bitcoin as being particularist so my natural inclination is that it should just own it. But that approach makes sense if you have universal aspirations.

@pourteaux嗯,我想我在心理上已经把比特币理解为特殊主义者,所以我的自然倾向是它应该拥有它。但如果你有普遍的愿望,这种方法是有意义的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux What's wrong with solidarity with online tribes? IMO that's the least offensive and most fruitful aspect of the whole enterprise; they've successfully bootstrapped an internet tribe that has actual social cohesion.

@pourteaux与在线部落的团结有什么错?在我看来,这是整个企业中最没有攻击性、最富有成效的方面;他们成功地引导了一个具有实际社会凝聚力的互联网部落。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@AnthonyLeeZhang Also executing equilibrium-flipping attacks (think breaking LUNA) has a high level of capital required to do the strategy at all.

@安东尼·李·张(AnthonyLeeZhang)也在执行平衡翻转攻击(想想打破月神吧),他有很高的资金来执行这一策略。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@TBSocialist @donovanchoy @__femb0t It's Hayek's rightwingness that is somewhat overstated. After all, he did support a UBI.

@TBSocial@donovanchoy@uu femb0t这是有点夸大了哈耶克的右翼。毕竟,他确实支持UBI。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@__femb0t @TBSocialist Ideology spotted ☺️ https://t.co/fxnFZcX36A

@TBS社会主义意识形态发现☺️ https://t.co/fxnFZcX36A

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@zengjiajun_eth @0xJim IMO a future where people run their own nodes by default (even if it's light clients, as long as they're trustless) is a future worth fighting for.
@ethnimbus people have been making some great strides in the light client direction lately.

@zengjiajun_eth@0xJim IMO人们默认运行自己节点的未来(即使是轻客户端,只要它们不受信任)是一个值得奋斗的未来。
@Ethinimbus人最近在轻客户方向上取得了一些重大进展。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@peterktodd But lots of PoS chains have been successfully running for years.
In fact, at the sub billion dollar market cap level PoS seems to already have a far more robust track record than PoW.

@但许多PoS连锁店已经成功运营多年。
事实上,在亚十亿美元的市值水平上,PoS似乎已经有了比PoW更为稳健的业绩记录。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

An older example of vaguely this kind of bad philosophy:
https://libertarianism.fandom....

这种糟糕的哲学有一个古老的例子:
https://libertarianism.fandom....

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Pro-tip: if there's a long-established tradition of people debating A vs B based on deep arguments touching on math, economics and moral philosophy, and you come along saying "B is dumb because of a one-line technicality involving definitions", you're probably wrong. https://twitter.com/jimmysong/...

Proof-of-stake does not solve the Byzantine General's Problem. Therefore, it does not provide decentralized consensus.
If you didn't understand this tweet, then you are completely unqualified to make any claims about proof-of-stake.

发表时间:4年前 作者:Jimmy Song (송재준) @jimmysong

专业提示:如果有一个悠久的传统,人们在涉及数学、经济学和道德哲学的深刻争论的基础上辩论a和B,你会说“B是愚蠢的,因为一行涉及定义的技术性”,你可能错了。https://twitter.com/jimmysong/...

赌注证明并不能解决拜占庭将军的问题。因此,它不提供分散的共识。
如果你不理解这条推文,那么你完全没有资格就利害关系证明提出任何索赔。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@robinhanson But which country did it come from? 😊

@罗宾汉森,但它来自哪个国家?😊

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@robinhanson So like, historians in the year 3000 will be vaguely aware that the US had high inequality, self-contradictory foreign policy and was bad at healthcare, but will think that it's clearly the most awesome country because it made the best memes?
Plausible...

@罗宾·汉森(robinhanson)就像3000年的历史学家一样,他们会模糊地意识到美国有着高度的不平等,自相矛盾的外交政策,在医疗保健方面也很糟糕,但他们会认为美国显然是最令人敬畏的国家,因为它创造了最好的模因?
看似合理的

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@gakonst The word "blinis" unnecessarily doubles the plural; the "i" in "blini" (блины) is already a plural ending.
But on the other hand...
The Russian word тулзы ("tulzy") is slang for "tools", adding the Russian plural ending onto a word that already has an "s".

@gakonst“blinis”一词不必要地将复数翻了一番;“blini”(ббиы)中的“i”已经是复数结尾。
但另一方面。。。
俄语单词tulzy是“tools”的俚语,在已经有“s”的单词上加上俄语复数结尾。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Versatile_Crypt @AnthonyLeeZhang Oh I am assuming that humans still provide the plot and the script. So making a movie becomes as easy as writing a play.

@多才多艺的Crypt@AnthonyLeeZhang哦,我假设人类仍然提供了情节和脚本。所以拍电影就像写剧本一样简单。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Claim: the crypto space is weird and dumb and we should go back to mainstream institutions which are ruled by adults.
Reality: https://twitter.com/RudyGiulia...

Great products at reasonable prices. Use code Rudy for additional savings https://t.co/O6EvkxHRt8

发表时间:4年前 作者:Rudy W. Giuliani @RudyGiuliani

声明:加密空间既奇怪又愚蠢,我们应该回到由成年人统治的主流机构。
现实:https://twitter.com/RudyGiulia...

物美价廉。使用代码Rudy可节省额外费用https://t.co/O6EvkxHRt8

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@WatcherGuru I was looking through my old files and remembered that as a teenager I was also a game developer.
This is the most complex one I made:
https://vitalik.ca/files/misc_...
Though I never figured out how to "publish" it, and no one else has beaten even the tutorial so far 😭

@WatcherGuru我翻阅了我的旧文件,记得十几岁的时候我也是一名游戏开发者。
这是我做的最复杂的一个:
https://vitalik.ca/files/misc_...
虽然我从来没有想出如何“发布”它,而且到目前为止,没有人能打败甚至教程😭

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@AnthonyLeeZhang I'm expecting/hoping that the cost of AI moviemaking is going to go way down soon.

@AnthonyLeeShang我期待/希望人工智能电影制作的成本很快会下降。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr Even in the hypothetical case where the US actually is on a path to becoming a low-government society, whether that looks like a market vs a mob vs an oligopoly of organized firms is a very open question.

@vgr即使在假设的情况下,美国实际上正在成为一个低政府社会,这看起来是否像市场对暴徒对有组织公司的寡头垄断,也是一个非常开放的问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr Zooming out a bit, "big government" and "big business" were only ever two legs of the triad (of risky forms of large-scale coordination). "Big mob" might be an equally pejorative way to describe the third one.

@vgr缩小了一点,“大政府”和“大企业”只是三位一体(大规模协调的风险形式)的两条腿。“大暴徒”可能是描述第三个暴徒的一种同样贬义的方式。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情