@MarcTheBulll Show me which part of PoS lets validators vote on protocol parameters.

@Marcthebull告诉我PoS的哪一部分允许验证器对协议参数进行投票。

It's amazing how some PoW proponents just keep repeating the unmitigated bare-faced lie that PoS includes voting on protocol parameters (it doesn't, just like PoW doesn't) and this so often just goes unchallenged.
Nodes reject invalid blocks, in PoS and in PoW. It's not hard. https://twitter.com/NickDPayto...

令人惊讶的是，一些PoW支持者一直在重复一个彻头彻尾的赤裸裸的谎言，即PoS包括对协议参数的投票（它没有，就像PoW没有一样），而这往往没有受到质疑。
节点拒绝PoS和PoW中的无效块。这并不难。https://twitter.com/NickDPayto...

Also, small grammar nuance: in English when talking about things like proof of stake, we don't say "it's a security", we say "it's secure". I know these suffixes are hard though, so I forgive the error.

此外，还有一些语法上的细微差别：在英语中，当谈到利害关系证明之类的事情时，我们不会说“这是一种安全”，而是说“它是安全的”。我知道这些后缀很难，所以我原谅这个错误。

@tszzl https://slatestarcodex.com/202...

@TSZLL公司https://slatestarcodex.com/202...

@skdh @robinhanson Status seeking is a zero-sum competitive game, so from a god's eye viewpoint it's worth setting norms to discourage it somewhat.

@skdh@robinhanson地位寻求是一个零和竞争游戏，所以从上帝的角度来看，设置一些规范来阻止它是值得的。

@PledditYT @robinhanson Small premines are glorious and good (though far from perfect, because they're not sustainable). The idea that miners should be the *only* ones who should get access to protocol-printed coins is an ideological perversion that the crypto space has thankfully moved beyond.

@Pledditytyt@robinhanson小型premines既光荣又美好（尽管远非完美，因为它们不可持续）。矿工应该是“唯一”应该获得协议印刷硬币的人，这是一种意识形态上的曲解，值得庆幸的是，加密空间已经超越了这种曲解。

@robinhanson People don't want to admit to themselves that they have unflattering motives (in this case, desire to climb social hierarchy). I hear some economist even wrote a book about this, something about elephants or something

@罗宾·汉森（robinhanson）的人不想承认自己有不讨人喜欢的动机（在这种情况下，他们渴望爬上社会等级）。我听说一些经济学家甚至写了一本关于大象的书

@RokoMijic Aren't those two causes literally the largest two hot topics in EA circles right now?

@RokoMijic难道这两个原因不是目前EA界最大的两个热门话题吗？

@AnthonyLeeZhang You can do a validium on top of an existing large-scale public blockchain and get most of the benefits but pay very low transaction fees.

@安东尼·李·张（AnthonyLeeZhang）你可以在现有的大规模公共区块链上做一个validium，获得大部分好处，但支付非常低的交易费用。

@CardanoPlankton @TrustlessState The british definition of "chips" is twisted and perverse. US chips are far from amazing either, but the british stuff... come on, like I totally get why the revolution happened now

@CardanoPlankton@TrustlessState英国对“芯片”的定义是扭曲和反常的。美国的芯片也远不惊人，但英国的东西。。。得了吧，我完全明白为什么现在发生了革命

@jooooo5as @CryptoGenghisK @TrustlessState I like vegan food too!

@jooooo5as@CryptoGenghisK@TrustlessState我也喜欢素食！

@LefterisJP @TrustlessState https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@LefterisJP@TrustlessStatehttps://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@CryptoGenghisK @TrustlessState 清蒸鱼 in authentic chinese restaurants is great imo. Healthy too.

@CryptoGenghisK@TrustlessState清蒸鱼 在正宗的中国餐馆里，我觉得很健康。

@TrustlessState Fish > steak imo

@TrustlessState Fish>；牛排imo

RT: @moo9000 @LefterisJP An underrated reason to use public blockchains is precisely the fact that the infrastructure has been so relentlessly stress tested against all kinds of attacks.

转发：@moo9000@LefterisJP使用公共区块链的一个被低估的原因正是因为基础设施已经针对各种攻击进行了无情的压力测试。

@moo9000 @LefterisJP An underrated reason to use public blockchains is precisely the fact that the infrastructure has been so relentlessly stress tested against all kinds of attacks.

@moo9000@LefterisJP使用公共区块链的一个被低估的原因，正是因为基础设施已经针对各种攻击进行了无情的压力测试。

@0xSisyphus eg. imo MakerDAO is decidedly in the latter category, and it should be trying to outlast its competition, not outmaneuver it.

@imo MakerDAO绝对属于后一类，它应该努力在竞争中保持长久，而不是超越竞争。

@0xSisyphus It depends on whether your DAO's job is to "execute quickly" or "not blow up". If the latter, it's countries (specifically constitutional democracies and transnational minarchies) that are a better source of inspiration.

@这取决于你的刀的任务是“快速执行”还是“不爆炸”。如果是后者，则是国家（特别是宪政民主国家和跨国政府）是更好的灵感来源。

@Criptocripto51 @skycult @bryan_caplan One of those immigrants gave me a $4.6 haircut a few months back (I tipped $5 extra). They did a great job, and in under 15 minutes.
Immigration is win-win humanitarianism, a lifeline for many immigrants and a quiet but significant quality of life improvement for the others too.

@Criptocripto51@skycult@bryan_caplan几个月前，其中一位移民给了我4.6美元的理发费（我额外给了5美元小费）。他们做得很好，不到15分钟。
移民是双赢的人道主义，是许多移民的生命线，也是其他人平静但显著的生活质量改善。

@skycult @bryan_caplan Undecided between fully open and "much more open", but the current mostly-closed border status quo is dystopian imo.

@布莱恩·卡普兰（bryan_caplan）在完全开放和“更加开放”之间犹豫不决，但在国际海事组织（imo）看来，目前大多封闭的边境现状是反乌托邦的。