@vgr There were pressures acting on employees and leadership at the intra-firm and cross-firm level, and the final result looked like a very harmonized policy shift across many platforms - not like market firms specializing.

@vgr在公司内部和跨公司层面上，员工和领导层承受着压力，最终结果看起来像是跨许多平台的非常协调的政策转变，而不像专业化的市场公司。

@vgr I don't think "relegated to the markets" is an accurate description. Like sure, Twitter banning Trump was a non-governmental actor deciding to stop serving a customer, but the processes that led to that happening don't look at all like firms acting on their supply/demand curves.

@vgr我不认为“降级到市场”是一个准确的描述。诚然，推特禁止特朗普是一个决定停止为客户服务的非政府行为体，但导致这种情况发生的过程看起来根本不像是按照供需曲线行事的公司。

@EliBenSasson @PapiniShahar @Justindr @TimBeiko @dankrad Isn't it standard in ethereum land to associate a block with the post-state of that block? After all, the post-state is what actually gets hashed into that block's header.

@EliBenSasson@PapiniShahar@Justindr@TimBeiko@dankrad在以太坊土地上，将一个街区与该街区的后状态相关联不是标准吗？毕竟，post状态实际上是散列到该块头中的状态。

RT: Probably the silliest anti-blockchain argument, IMO, is that it doesn't have credit card purchase protection, chargebacks, etc. You are literally forcing everyone to pay 2% of _everything they buy with a credit card_ for purchase protection! 2%!!!

RT：IMO，最愚蠢的反区块链论点可能是，它没有信用卡购买保护、退款等。你实际上是在强迫每个人支付他们用信用卡购买的所有东西的2%作为购买保护！2%!!!

I'm not usually a modern art appreciatooooor but I genuinely think the one on the right looks cooler. https://twitter.com/michaeljkn...

我通常不是一个现代艺术欣赏者，但我真的认为右边的那个看起来很酷。https://twitter.com/michaeljkn...

@koeppelmann @drakefjustin @weboftrees I really don't think total validator count being too low is a significant possibility. Remember that because of prio fees + MEV, the reward curve steepens to r ~ 1/deposits when deposits are near zero.

@koeppelmann@drakefjustin@weboftrees我真的不认为验证器总数太低是一个很大的可能性。请记住，由于prio费用+MEV，当存款接近零时，奖励曲线会变陡至r~1/存款。

@koeppelmann @drakefjustin @weboftrees Right, so discouragement attacks would be viable under any level of demand (as opposed to the economic limiting proposal, where they're only viable under very exceptional scenarios)

@koeppelmann@drakefjustin@weboftrees是的，因此劝阻性攻击在任何需求水平下都是可行的（与经济限制方案相反，在经济限制方案中，只有在非常特殊的情况下才可行）

@Bananaplanet2 @drakefjustin @weboftrees I would say keep it single-slot but make slot time variable (or rather, cancel slots that aren't a multiple of whatever extended duration you want). Definitely a reasonable direction to explore compromising.

@Bananaplanet2@drakefjustin@weboftrees我想说的是，保持单时隙，但时隙时间可变（或者更确切地说，取消不是您想要的延长时间倍数的时隙）。这绝对是探索妥协的合理方向。

@koeppelmann @drakefjustin @weboftrees Unfortunately targeting an exact count makes discouragement attack incentives really horrible.
See https://github.com/ethereum/re... https://t.co/fiSD5a3G6T

@koeppelmann@drakefjustin@weboftrees不幸的是，目标精确的数字使得泄气攻击的动机非常可怕。
看见https://github.com/ethereum/re... https://t.co/fiSD5a3G6T

Some different approaches for capping the validator set size, to decrease the load of a beacon chain node and make Ethereum more ready for single-slot finality:
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb...
Thanks @drakefjustin @weboftrees for help!

限制验证器集大小的一些不同方法，以减少信标链节点的负载，并使以太坊更容易实现单插槽最终性：
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb。。。
感谢@drakefjustin@weboftrees的帮助！

@gakonst @rauljordaneth https://github.com/ethereum/ca...

@gakonst@rauljordanethhttps://github.com/ethereum/ca...

@cobie Recently saw this at an airport. It's not that far off as a description of the last two years of mainstream defi! https://t.co/r2o4UjkZEd

@科比最近在机场看到了这一点。这与对过去两年主流defi的描述并不遥远！https://t.co/r2o4UjkZEd

@NathanpmYoung That's the best I came up with too. Anti immigration sentiment seems to be correlated to feelings of lack of control, and not actual immigration levels, so it's possible chaotic illegal immigration might through backlash reduce legal immigration enough to be net negative.

@NathanPmeung这也是我想到的最好的。反移民情绪似乎与缺乏控制的感觉有关，而不是与实际的移民水平有关，因此，混乱的非法移民可能会通过反弹减少合法移民，从而达到净负面效果。

@EthereumJesus In reality of course, there's nobody "deciding whether to stake ETH or stake XMP".
There's ETH holders deciding whether or not to stake their ETH, and XMP holders deciding whether or not to stake their XMP.
Return rates denominated in different assets are NOT comparable!

@以太坊耶稣在现实中，当然，没有人“决定是赌ETH还是赌XMP”。
ETH持有人决定是否入股ETH，XMP持有人决定是否入股XMP。
不同资产的回报率不具有可比性！

@EthereumJesus People think that "people will prefer to stake Examplechain over Ethereum because Ethereum gives you only 5% returns but Examplechain gives you 20%"

@以太坊Jesus的人认为“人们更愿意用Examplechain而不是以太坊，因为以太坊只给你5%的回报，而Examplechain给你20%”

@pintail_xyz @dankrad All looks correct to me!
(In case anyone is interested in a more technical/detailed look at what's going on I recently wrote this up too: https://vitalik.ca/general/202... )

@pintail\u xyz@dankrad在我看来都是正确的！
（如果有人对正在发生的事情感兴趣，我最近也写了这篇文章：https://vitalik.ca/general/202... )

@adietrichs @devonzuegel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@devonzuegel的Aditerichshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@migowski @devonzuegel It probably applies to the medians too, but it definitely applies to the average.
Toy example: three buses with {4, 1, 1} passengers.
Average bus: avg(4, 1, 1) = (4+1+1) / 3 = 2 passengers
Average passenger's bus: avg(4, 4, 4, 4, 1, 1) = (4+4+4+4+1+1) / 6 = 3 passengers

@migowski@devonzuegel它可能也适用于中间值，但它肯定适用于平均值。
玩具示例：三辆载有{4，1，1}名乘客的公共汽车。
平均公交车：平均（4，1，1）=（4+1+1）/3=2名乘客
平均客运量：平均（4，4，4，4，4，1，1）=（4+4+4+4+1+1）/6=3名乘客

@devonzuegel Ah yes, the "the average bus-passenger is on a bus that's much more full than the average bus" effect. One of my favorite mathematical paradoxes.

@devonzuegel啊，是的，“普通公交车乘客乘坐的公交车比普通公交车要满得多”的影响。我最喜欢的数学悖论之一。

@evan_van_ness @pizzalord_pizza It's misinformation™ for at least the last one and a half months.

@evan\u van\u ness@pizzalord\u pizza这是错误信息™ 至少在过去的一个半月里。