@luigidemeo @DeFi_Cheetah @crypto_condom @rektdiomedes Yeah, the latter seems very stupid.
The former - not very cool also, but quite can see why (e.g. token which major use case is the stablecoin 100% collateralizing this same stablecoin is proved to be pretty challenging so far in many cases).
@luigidemeo @DeFi_Cheetah @crypto_condom @rektdiomedes 是的，后者似乎很愚蠢。
前者 - 也不是很酷，但很容易理解为什么（例如，主要用例是稳定币的代币 100% 抵押同一个稳定币在许多情况下被证明是相当具有挑战性的）。