@MalarkeyMilady @PeterSchiff Initial premium was probably the demand from things like 401(k) which could not invest in Bitcoin directly. But as that limited demand was exhausted, it went sub-1:1 as it should?
@MalarkeyMilady@PeterSchiff初始溢价可能是401（k）之类无法直接投资比特币的东西的需求。但随着有限的需求耗尽，它本应低于1:1？