Aeon 的最新消息

@lpcs43c @BaconBacon1969 @thoaidngo @luckytran A supreme court set on dismantling the institution of regulatory authority would say that isn't specific enough, which is exactly what they said in overturning the eviction ban.

@lpcs43c@BaconBacon1969@thoaidngo@luckytran一家最高法院决定撤销监管机构,该法院会说这不够具体,这正是他们在推翻驱逐禁令时所说的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@evolutionarypsy @mikejohansenmd @ChristosArgyrop It means double, or triple, or quadruple, or...
No one really knows.
"Endemic" doesn't define quantity.

@进化心理学@mikejohansenmd@ChristosArgyrop它的意思是双倍,或三倍,或四倍,或。。。
没有人真正知道。
“地方病”并没有定义数量。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@squintskm2020 @TheStalwart @cz_binance Some of the coins received a fees are probably stable coins, so that helps a bit. Might be a lot, depending on the highest volume pairs (I don't know what those are).

@squintskm2020@TheStalwart@cz_binance收到的一些硬币可能是稳定的硬币,所以这有点帮助。可能很多,取决于最高的卷对(我不知道它们是什么)。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@squintskm2020 @TheStalwart @cz_binance Nope https://t.co/99L19SfFYP

@squintskm2020@TheStalwart@cz binance Nopehttps://t.co/99L19SfFYP

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DavidAb10822584 @michaelmina_lab Perhaps. I saw it as more emphasis about what I was asking.
It was a sincere question. I still haven't gotten an answer (from him).

@DavidAb10822584@michaelmina_实验室也许。我认为这更强调了我的要求。
这是一个真诚的问题。我还没有(从他那里)得到答复。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DavidAb10822584 @michaelmina_lab Most everyone (if not all) who has ever tried to forecast infections has already considered acquired immunity. I don't see the actionable here.

@DavidAb10822584@michaelmina_实验室大多数曾经尝试预测感染的人(如果不是全部的话)都已经考虑过获得性免疫力。我看不出这里有什么可采取的行动。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@itosettiMD_MBA @silkabelli @flowermusickids @kprather88 Of course.

@当然,这是我的MBA@silkabelli@flowermusickids@kprather88。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@itosettiMD_MBA @silkabelli @flowermusickids @kprather88 This isn't about health care particularly. Still you are not wrong.

@itosettiMD_MBA@silkabelli@flowermusickids@kprather88这与医疗保健无关。你仍然没有错。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LisaForKansas @michaelmina_lab That is effectiveness not efficacy.

@LisaForKansas@michaelmina_实验室,这是有效性而非有效性。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@silkabelli @flowermusickids @kprather88 @itosettiMD_MBA The ideological view is that an unregulated system won't break down.

@silkabelli@flowermusickids@kprather88@itosettiMD_MBA意识形态观点认为,不受监管的体系不会崩溃。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@watermelonpunch @Elliot_43 @xgoogoogoox Pretty important is how this works with reinfection.
Because if it is 2-3 points each time, then pretty soon you are talking about ending civilization.

@西瓜粉@Elliot_43@xgooox相当重要的是它如何与再感染协同工作。
因为如果每次都是2-3分,那么很快你就会谈论结束文明。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@cattzee3 @VanGennepD 100% this. So much bullshit in this pandemic owes to the necessity (or at least perceived necessity) of trying to "sell" vaccines. https://t.co/jUgYNRR8Eg

@cattzee3@VanGennepD 100%支持这一点。这场大流行中如此多的胡说八道都归功于试图“出售”疫苗的必要性(或至少是人们认为的必要性)。https://t.co/jUgYNRR8Eg

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@VanGennepD "told they might increase spread"
is a curious position given guidance from both CDC and DOE recommending them.

@VanGennepD“被告知他们可能会增加传播”
在CDC和DOE的指导下,这是一个奇怪的建议。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@girl75219 @ScottGottliebMD @morgfair Bad for business. Look at his bio.

@女孩75219@ScottGottliebMD@morgfair对生意不利。看看他的简历。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ChristosArgyrop Or can we start 2022?
"Last leg"
https://twitter.com/ScottGottl...

People are understandably fed up and want this to be over, they’ve sacrificed a lot over the last two years, and many who took great efforts to avoid covid now find them and their kids getting it, and feel disheartened to get it now, right when the pandemic may be on its last leg https://twitter.com/FaceTheNat...

发表时间:2年前 作者:Scott Gottlieb, MD @ScottGottliebMD

@我们能从2022年开始吗?
“最后一站”
https://twitter.com/ScottGottl...

可以理解的是,人们受够了,希望这一切结束。在过去两年中,他们牺牲了很多,许多为避免新冠病毒而付出巨大努力的人现在发现他们和他们的孩子都感染了新冠病毒,并对现在感染新冠病毒感到沮丧,而这正是流感大流行的最后阶段https://twitter.com/FaceTheNat...

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@cartoon_soldier @FaceTheNation @ScottGottliebMD Weeks away

@卡通士兵@Facehenation@ScottGottliebMD几周后

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@millenialmouth @DanglerDom @ScottGottliebMD Plus the states with fewer restrictions are generally not the ones with big dense cities (with subways, etc.).
The original wave that crushed NYC and had people dying at home because they were told not to go the hospital until they turned blue only infected around 20%

@millenialmouth@DanglerDom@ScottGottliebMD加上限制较少的州通常不是拥有大密集城市(有地铁等)的州。
最初的浪潮摧毁了纽约市,人们在家中死亡,因为他们被告知在变蓝之前不要去医院,但只感染了大约20%

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@millenialmouth @DanglerDom @ScottGottliebMD Fewer than you think. Nearly all states had restrictions of some kind at various times. Many big corps implemented covid mitigations nationwide regardless of state rules. Many working from home even in "no mitigations" states.

@millenialmouth@DanglerDom@ScottGottliebMD比你想象的要少。几乎所有国家在不同时期都有某种限制。许多大型兵团不顾国家规定,在全国范围内实施了新冠肺炎缓解措施。许多人甚至在“无缓解措施”的州在家工作。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BernieDogs4 @ChristosArgyrop 2020, what a great year! https://t.co/XAAx8il4cb

@BernieDogs4@ChristosArgyrop 2020,多么美好的一年!https://t.co/XAAx8il4cb

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情