@gruzman28 @jklmd123 @uche_blackstock It would be a lot less on transit, therefore less crowding, therefore less transmission, as it was during stay-at-home orders, which didn't keep nuclear operators, etc. at home either.
Of course, mitigate further with masks, opening windows, etc. But de-crowding helps a lot.

@gruzman28@jklmd123@uche_blackstock这将大大减少运输，因此减少拥挤，因此减少传输，就像在家里订单期间一样，这也不会让核操作员等留在家里。
当然，可以通过遮罩、打开窗户等进一步缓解，但去拥挤有很大帮助。

@jfeldman_epi @wsbgnl How is that even remotely "todays deaths"?
That's a false claim in the article which should be brought to the attention of editors and corrected (I'm not holding my breath)

@jfeldman_epi@wsbgnl这怎么会是“今天的死亡”？
这篇文章中的说法是错误的，应该引起编辑的注意并加以纠正（我没有屏住呼吸）

@gruzman28 @jklmd123 @uche_blackstock It's fewer people on the transit if they're working for home = safer for the transit workers (and other in-person workers who have to use it) too

@gruzman28@jklmd123@uche_blackstock如果他们在家工作，交通工具上的人会更少=对交通工具工人（以及其他不得不使用它的现场工人）来说也更安全

@Marco_Piani @Bob_Wachter Maybe a little? I've yet to see anyone report testing negative at day 5. Maybe it happens, maybe not.

@Marco_Piani@Bob_Wachter也许有一点？我还没有看到任何人在第5天检测呈阴性。也许会发生，也许不会。

@lisa_iannattone Motivated reasoning at best, or simply lying

@lisa_iannattone充其量只是出于推理，或者只是撒谎

@farid__jalali @flowermusickids KN95s mostly don't even have straps.
The hesitancy and conditionalizing of this recommendation is absurd.

@farid__jalali@flowermusickids KN95大多甚至没有肩带。
这项建议的犹豫不决和附加条件是荒谬的。

@DrEricDing Nothing like telling people to expect it to be uncomfortable to tank uptake. Nicely done CDC, as usual.

@没有什么比告诉人们期待它是不舒服的坦克。和往常一样，CDC做得很好。

@ryan_landay We have no idea how many of the current deaths are Omicron, but certainly not all.

@ryan_landay我们不知道目前有多少人死于Omicron，但肯定不是全部。

@EverydayFinance @R_H_Ebright https://www.statnews.com/2021/... https://t.co/MxTpNBVjWE

@每日金融@R u H u Ebrighthttps://www.statnews.com/2021/... https://t.co/MxTpNBVjWE

@ryan_landay Probably false. More lower risk vaccinated people being infected than before Omicron really took off. But it will go up.

@ryan_landay可能是错的。与奥米克隆真正起飞之前相比，接种疫苗的人感染的风险更低。但它会上升。

@michaelmina_lab @DAlperovitch @moskov @Robin_Quon @AbbottNews Lucira says 30 minutes.

@michaelmina_lab@DAlperovitch@moskov@Robin_Quon@AbbottNews Lucira说30分钟。

@DAlperovitch @michaelmina_lab @moskov @Robin_Quon @AbbottNews If it can detect a smaller amount, in theory it may still work. There can't truly be 'none' in the upper airway if you are breathing it out. But no data on this of course.

@DAlperovitch@michaelmina_lab@moskov@Robin_Quon@AbbottNews如果它能检测到少量，理论上它可能仍然有效。如果你在呼气，上呼吸道不可能真的没有。当然，没有这方面的数据。

@dianaberrent No way! America should handle covid like Sweden!
Oh wait.

@戴安娜：不可能！美国应该像瑞典一样处理新冠病毒！
哦，等等。

@WhiteHouse Read the room.

@怀特豪斯在房间里看书。

@itosettiMD_MBA @j_g_allen There is no bottom. 142k US hospitalizations on its was to 275k will make "crisis standards" look like the good old days.

@我认为MBA@j_g_艾伦没有底部。从过去的14.2万到27.5万，美国的住院人数将使“危机标准”看起来像过去的好日子。

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb Which is kind of okay, really. It would be a pingdemic and basically useless. At this point as you say, everyone knows they are exposed all the time.

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb这是一种好的，真的。这将是一个简单的过程，基本上是无用的。正如你所说，在这一点上，每个人都知道他们一直暴露在外。

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb Probably capacity to contact people is maxed out far below current case levels, so the probability of getting one doesn't really go up as the cases do. Or NY/NJ tracers don't use exposure notification, no idea.

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb可能与人联系的能力已经超出了目前的病例水平，因此感染的概率并没有像病例那样上升。或者NY/NJ追踪器不使用曝光通知，不知道。

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb Definitely. Do people get notifications?

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb。人们收到通知了吗？

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb A few people I know in various states have gotten Exposure Notifications, which only happen if someone is reached by a contact tracer. So it's happening to some degree, even if spotty and under-resourced.

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb我认识的几个人在不同的州都收到了接触通知，只有通过接触追踪者联系到某人时才会发生这种情况。因此，在某种程度上，这是正在发生的，即使是零散和资源不足。

@jklmd123 @tmprowell 20% are out, supposedly. Even bringing all 20% back ins hypothetical, if it were possible (it isn't), won't solve a rise from 142k to 275k.

@据推测，jklmd123@tmprowell有20%的人被淘汰了。如果可能的话（事实并非如此），即使将20%的收入全部收回，也无法解决从14.2万增加到27.5万的问题。