Aeon 的最新消息

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb As long as it is clearly defined, that's okay. Though it's still going to be confusing in terms of plain language (in English at least)

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb只要定义清楚,就可以了。虽然它仍然会在简单的语言方面令人困惑(至少在英语中)

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb That's the sort of thing where you have to dig into the sources. Sometimes, for example, contact tracing scripts, symptom checks, etc. they usually ask if you have specific symptoms from a list, but if just asking "are you symptomatic", that's definitely going to be less clear.

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb这是一种你必须挖掘来源的东西。有时,例如,联系跟踪脚本、症状检查等。他们通常会问你是否有列表中的特定症状,但如果只是问“你有症状吗”,那肯定就不那么清楚了。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb "Cold-like symptoms" is by definition symptomatic. I have no idea if CDC is using polls or what other sources. Usually if you dig into their work you can find sources, but I'm not motivated to bother because my confidence in them is so low anyway.

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb“感冒样症状”定义为有症状。我不知道CDC是否使用民意调查或其他来源。通常,如果你深入他们的工作,你可以找到来源,但我没有动力去打扰他们,因为我对他们的信心太低了。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb Then again, this is CDC. Their track record working with data is poor. I'd trust numbers from just about anywhere else more.

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb再一次,这是CDC。他们处理数据的记录很差。我更相信其他任何地方的数字。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @MichaelColey @trvrb 15.5%. May or may not be lower for Omicron. At that point I'm not sure any change would be noticeable subjectively to individuals even if it went to nearly zero.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@肉豆蔻031992@MichaelColey@trvrb 15.5%。Omicron可能会更低,也可能不会更低。在这一点上,我不确定任何变化对个人主观上是否会明显,即使它几乎为零。
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Reasonableques3 @j_g_allen @olgakhazan I don't think they 'solved' anything in 2020 either. Just a contributor to overall suppression. Not enough on its own most places, if at all (probably nowhere).

@合理问题3@j_g_allen@olgakhazan我认为他们也没有在2020年“解决”任何问题。只是整体抑制的一个因素。在大多数地方,如果有的话(可能没有)就不够了。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelmina_lab @Robin_Quon @AbbottNews How do you get to "tests working" without both?

@michaelmina_lab@Robin_Quon@AbbottNews如果没有两者,你如何才能“测试工作”?

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Reasonableques3 @j_g_allen @olgakhazan But to be fair, throwing out a mask mandate (if that), not even encouraging better masks, not enforcing, and not doing much else, just isn't enough and is isn't much of a solution to anything. Hence look around and see all the things I mentioned happening, not solved.

@合理的问题3@j_g_allen@olgakhazan但公平地说,放弃面具授权(如果是这样的话),甚至不鼓励更好的面具,不强制执行,也不做很多其他事情,这是不够的,也不是什么解决办法。因此,环顾四周,看看我提到的所有事情正在发生,而不是解决。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Reasonableques3 @j_g_allen @olgakhazan Probably not true ("any old" mask, which to be fair includes some people w/good ones, seems to reduce spread by about 25% when widely used), but in any case kind of irrelevant to the discussion here, which is about wearing N95s.

@合理的问题3@j_g_allen@olgakhazan可能不是真的(“任何旧的”面具,公平地说,包括一些人和好的人,在广泛使用时似乎可以减少传播25%左右),但无论如何与这里的讨论无关,这是关于佩戴N95的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RASmith2017 🤡🎪
https://twitter.com/business/s... https://t.co/LDDaXzMRwh

The U.S. CDC on Tuesday advised against travel to Singapore because the Covid-19 situation in the Southeast Asian country is 'unknown' https://trib.al/r2C7JLn

发表时间:2年前 作者:Bloomberg @business

@RASmith2017`129313;🎪
https://twitter.com/business/s... https://t.co/LDDaXzMRwh

由于2019冠状病毒疾病在东南亚国家“未知”,美国疾病预防控制中心星期二建议不前往新加坡。https://trib.al/r2C7JLn

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Reasonableques3 @j_g_allen @olgakhazan When hospitals are diverting, going on crisis standards, and supply chains and critical infrastructure is being disrupted, that's a social problem calling for a societal solution, not an individual one.
I'm all for individualist solutions when suitable. This isn't that.

@合理问题3@j_g_allen@olgakhazan当医院分流、达到危机标准、供应链和关键基础设施被破坏时,这是一个社会问题,需要社会解决,而不是个人解决。
如果合适,我完全支持个人主义解决方案。这不是那个。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@thereal_truther @danielkotzin This is all we need here
https://twitter.com/monhelt/st...

@ianmSC Here’s a better graph from New York City. Hospitalization rate unvaccinated versus vaccinated. https://t.co/sbxY0mIPEb

发表时间:2年前 作者:Ella @monhelt

@thereal_truther@danielkotzin这就是我们需要的
https://twitter.com/monhelt/st...

@这是一张来自纽约市的更好的图表。未接种疫苗与接种疫苗的住院率。https://t.co/sbxY0mIPEb

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@j_g_allen @olgakhazan One way masking does work, but two way masking works a lot better. There are inevitably times when people need to take their masks off, masks slip, people who can't wear masks, etc.. Keeping most infectious crap out of the air to start better than trying to filter it out later.

@j_g_艾伦@olgakhazan单向掩蔽确实有效,但双向掩蔽效果更好。有时人们不可避免地需要摘下口罩,口罩滑落,不能戴口罩的人等等。。一开始就把最具传染性的垃圾远离空气,比以后再过滤要好。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JimTurchi @gardengirl778 @KeeneBrian @j_g_allen @angrybklynmom @olgakhazan Even without you are getting substantial protection, often as good as if tested (i.e. would have passed).
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@gardengirl778 @RonRRossi @j_g_allen @olgakhazan Aura has a fit test pass rate in untrained individuals of about 85% (was authorized by FDA in 2008 for public use), and other N95s are usually in the 60-70% range. If you subjectively have a "reasonably good" fit, you're well protected, certainly much better than without.

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@JimTurchi@gardengirl778@KeeneBrian@j_g_allen@angrybklynmom@olgakhazan即使没有你也会得到实质性的保护,通常就像测试一样好(即通过测试)。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@gardengirl778@RonRRossi@j_g_allen@olgakhazan Aura在未经培训的个体中的适合测试通过率约为85%(2008年经FDA批准用于公共用途),其他N95通常在60-70%范围内。如果你主观上有一个“相当好”的身材,你会得到很好的保护,当然比没有保护要好得多。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@gardengirl778 @KeeneBrian @j_g_allen @angrybklynmom @olgakhazan Brace or wearing a stretch-tight cloth over is better, but it's also possible to wear a surgical mask with a much better fit (i.e. without obvious huge gaps) than that picture if you just try.

@gardengirl778@KeeneBrian@j_g_allen@angrybklynmom@olgakhazan支具或戴一块弹性绷紧的布是更好的,但如果你只是尝试,也可以戴一个比照片更合身(即没有明显的巨大间隙)的外科口罩。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@gardengirl778 @RonRRossi @j_g_allen @olgakhazan Aura has a fit test pass rate in untrained individuals of about 85% (was authorized by FDA in 2008 for public use), and other N95s are usually in the 60-70% range. If you subjectively have a "reasonably good" fit, you're well protected, certainly much better than without.

@gardengirl778@RonRRossi@j_g_allen@olgakhazan Aura在未经培训的个体中的适合测试通过率约为85%(2008年经FDA批准用于公共用途),其他N95通常在60-70%范围内。如果你主观上有一个“相当好”的身材,你会得到很好的保护,当然比没有保护要好得多。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@davidmullin @hellbee_ @DrTomFrieden Exactly

@davidmullin@hellbee@DrTomFrieden完全正确

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MichaelColey @trvrb CDC has dramatically lowered its estimate of total asymptomatic cases during the whole pandemic, not just Omicron. Anecdotally there have always been a lot of instances where people may test asymptomatic but end up developing systems at some point.

@MichaelColey@trvrb CDC大幅降低了对整个大流行期间无症状病例总数的估计,而不仅仅是Omicron。有趣的是,在很多情况下,人们可能会检测出无症状,但最终会开发出一些系统。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MagisterBracey Considering all of the people who "wear masks" and go to restaurants...

@考虑到所有“戴着面具”去餐馆的人。。。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 @POTUS A lot of it is documented in reporting, including trying to avoid impact being TOO awful while ALSO avoiding damaging and distracting political battles, but over time it has evolved into:
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@TheSkylineTrail @NKinNewEng @wsbgnl They want the most widespread and fastest surge in order to hope for a sustained period of quiescence from acquired immunity during the midterm elections in order to be able to focus the campaign on things other than the catastrophically failed pandemic response.

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@jklmd123@POTUS报告中记录了很多信息,包括试图避免造成太可怕的影响,同时避免破坏性和分散注意力的政治斗争,但随着时间的推移,它已经演变为:
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@他们希望得到最广泛和最快的增兵,以期在中期选举期间从获得的免疫力中获得一段持续的平静期,以便能够将竞选活动的重点放在灾难性失败的大流行反应以外的事情上。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情