Aeon 的最新消息

@iYamWhutIAm @mattyglesias This isn't NYC, it's another city.

@iYamWhutIAm @mattyglesias 这不是纽约,而是另一个城市。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@paisleyspring @chrisherstam @Lofoir @DougDucey Around half will

@paisleyspring @chrisherstam @Lofoir @DougDucey 大约有一半会

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@trailrunner402 @katiegibbs @zhang_yueting Businesses don't want to lose even a small segment of their customers. Often they're highly leveraged and that segment is the difference between profit and loss, between viability and not.

@trailrunner402 @katiegibbs @zhang_yueting 企业不想失去一小部分客户。通常,它们的杠杆率很高,而这部分是盈亏之间、生存能力与不生存能力之间的差异。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@itosettiMD_MBA @PaulStenton1 Not disagreeing, but, is half enough?
I'm not going on a cruise whether risk is reduced by half or not, and I'm not 80 yo and very vulnerable, like many cruise customers.

@itosettiMD_MBA @PaulStenton1 不反对,但是,够了吗?
无论风险是否降低一半,我都不会去游轮,而且我不是 80 岁,而且像许多游轮客户一样非常脆弱。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@PaulStenton1 @itosettiMD_MBA People REALLY don't want to wear FFP3 on their vacation (nor plausible for dining, drinking, etc.). Saying this not as an anti masker, but realistic.
I think part of the problem is reputational. Cruise "brand" is damaged by being revealed as "dirty" (which they always were).

@PaulStenton1 @itosettiMD_MBA 人们真的不想在度假时穿FFP3(也不适合用餐、喝酒等)。说这不是作为反掩饰,而是现实。
我认为部分问题是声誉问题。 Cruise“品牌”因被揭露为“肮脏”(他们一直如此)而受到损害。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sri_srikrishna Transient time matters for things like Skagitt Valley. It was a choir practice, that's usually a limited period of time, 2.5 hours in that case. Of course others may use the space before or after, but also may not.

@sri_srikrishna 瞬态时间对于像斯卡吉特谷这样的事情很重要。这是一次合唱练习,通常是有限的时间,在这种情况下是 2.5 小时。当然其他人可以使用之前或之后的空间,但也可以不使用。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mattmazewski @wsbgnl @BernieDogs4 @2Mombie @oohussey There is a similar effect for many employers where turnover is high enough that longer term health of employees is someone else's problem, and even a percent in deaths doesn't affect employee retention very much relatively speaking.

@mattmazewski @wsbgnl @BernieDogs4 @2Mombie @oohussey 对于许多雇主来说,也有类似的影响,因为员工流动率足够高,以至于员工的长期健康是别人的问题,相对而言,即使是死亡百分比也不会影响员工保留率.

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ravingcoeliac @MuseWendi @AdrianBallou Take out works.

@ravingcoeliac @MuseWendi @AdrianBallou 拿出作品。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@arijitchakrav @mildanalyst disintegration and/or dismantling

@arijitchakrav @mildanalyst 解体和/或拆除

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CT_Bergstrom @kellumdander The platform is shitty, but it's also somewhat the nature of putting yourself out there and interacting with the public. "The public" always includes some number of assholes.

@CT_Bergstrom @kellumdander 这个平台很糟糕,但这也有点像把自己放在那里并与公众互动的本质。 “公众”总是包括一些混蛋。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CT_Bergstrom @kellumdander "The people" sorry no. Many of, and most probably the vast majority of, people who appreciated his work for 30 months did not do that.

@CT_Bergstrom @kellumdander “人民”对不起,没有。 30 个月来欣赏他的工作的许多人,很可能是绝大多数人并没有这样做。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@PaulGBrandon @camerongraham @YorkUniversity Not voluntarily. They would probably ban bringing it into a classroom first.

@PaulGBrandon @camerongraham @YorkUniversity 不是自愿的。他们可能会先禁止将其带入教室。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Noahpinion Not that surprising. It's main product is aging out and it doesn't have multiple successful business lines like the others.

@Noahpinion 并不奇怪。它的主要产品已经过时,并且没有像其他产品那样成功的多个业务线。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FinchTH @AndrewNoymer People do that with N95s too. The only reason it doesn't happen more than it does is N95 use being relatively rare, so the people doing that are taking a bit more initiative.

@FinchTH @AndrewNoymer 人们也用 N95 来做到这一点。它没有发生的唯一原因是 N95 的使用相对较少,所以这样做的人采取了更多的主动性。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@PeterHotez @cvspharmacy Why the hell can't someone giving a vaccine wear a mask?

@PeterHotez @cvspharmacy 为什么打疫苗的人不能戴口罩?

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@myrabatchelder It's a bubble of privilege but also a bubble of stupidity. Elites are not immune, in fact they can often afford to be more stupid and get away with it.

@myrabatchelder 这是特权的泡沫,也是愚蠢的泡沫。精英们也不能幸免,事实上,他们通常可以承受得更愚蠢而侥幸逃脱。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Sockpuppet_Doug @calculatedrisk @TheStalwart Both? But higher rents probably offsetting higher rates, not clear how that nets out.

@Sockpuppet_Doug @calculatedrisk @TheStalwart 两者都有?但更高的租金可能抵消了更高的利率,尚不清楚这是如何抵消的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Sockpuppet_Doug @calculatedrisk @TheStalwart There's no return to baseline, at least not yet or any time soon. There is a decline but still a huge amount of WFH.

@Sockpuppet_Doug @calculatedrisk @TheStalwart 没有回归基线,至少目前还没有,或者很快就没有。 WFH有所下降,但数量仍然很大。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 @tnicholsmd https://t.co/QYzxM0fSZ6

@jklmd123 @tnicholsmd https://t.co/QYzxM0fSZ6

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 @tnicholsmd Patients don't really love admin, especially given all the hassles with billing. They're mostly conditioned to accept it, scared away from real reforms as "socialism", etc.

@jklmd123 @tnicholsmd 患者并不真正喜欢管理员,尤其是考虑到计费的所有麻烦。他们大多习惯于接受它,害怕真正的改革,如“社会主义”等。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情