@Terror_Alarm @RemindMe_OfThis in 1 year https://t.co/MoKQc3H8Zh

@Terror_Alarm @RemindMe_OfThis 在 1 年内 https://t.co/MoKQc3H8Zh

@farid__jalali Mostly this
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@farid__jalali 主要是这个
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@famulare_mike @Don_Milton There are a lot of well-known, well-educated people who look very calm at a table with absolutely no protection at all. I wouldn't read too much into that.

@famulare_mike @Don_Milton 有很多知名的、受过良好教育的人在一张完全没有任何保护措施的桌子上看起来很平静。我不会读太多。

@benedictevans Why I still use an old phone. It's supposed to be portable, right? Right? https://t.co/p30noYsIC9

@beneddictevans 为什么我仍然使用旧手机。应该是便携的吧？正确的？ https://t.co/p30noYsIC9

@FinchTH @exsibilation Yes there's a lot of divide-and-conquer by downplayers and chaos agents. That each individual measure (masks, isolation, border controls, ventilation, etc., etc.) and argue that it "doesn't work" or "won't stop" spread on its own. All misinformation even if narrowly true.

@FinchTH @exsibilation 是的，低调者和混乱代理人有很多分而治之。每个单独的措施（口罩、隔离、边境控制、通风等）并争辩说它“不起作用”或“不会停止”自行传播。所有错误信息，即使勉强正确。

@__philipn__ @FinchTH @exsibilation Yes of course since Obama administration released the same mask to the public in 2008. Setting aside the complete shitshow of #45 administration, why did many of the same people returning for the Biden administration ignore it or outright discourage it?
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@__philipn__ @FinchTH @exsibilation 是的，当然，因为奥巴马政府在 2008 年向公众发布了同样的面具。搁置完整的狗屎秀

@exsibilation @FinchTH I mean if any old cloth filtered well, we wouldn't have all these high tech filtration materials. It is probably possible to make a cloth mask that filters at 90% or so, but it requires a mix of very specific cloths, and still harder to breathe. Mostly pointless.

@exsibilation @FinchTH 我的意思是，如果任何旧布过滤得很好，我们就不会拥有所有这些高科技过滤材料。可能有可能制造出过滤率在 90% 左右的布口罩，但它需要混合非常特殊的布，而且仍然更难呼吸。大多是无意义的。

@exsibilation @FinchTH Probably both to some extent, but filtration isn't much better. There are lots of filtration test papers for various masks.

@exsibilation @FinchTH 在某种程度上可能两者兼而有之，但过滤也好不了多少。各种口罩的过滤试纸很多。

@exsibilation @FinchTH It was looking at masking benefit in a universal masking context.

@exsibilation @FinchTH 它正在研究通用掩蔽上下文中的掩蔽优势。

@exsibilation @FinchTH Oops, looks like I misremembered the number 71%->72%

@exsibilation @FinchTH 哎呀，好像我记错了数字 71%-

@exsibilation @FinchTH Here's the study https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@exsibilation @FinchTH 这是研究 https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@exsibilation @FinchTH 71% combined reduction of aerosols through outflow and inflow, using mannequins that don't move around or anything (and also don't have odd size/shape faces), so probably better than real world in practice.

@exsibilation @FinchTH 71% 通过流出和流入减少气溶胶，使用不会四处移动或任何东西（也没有奇怪的尺寸/形状面孔）的人体模型，因此在实践中可能比现实世界更好。

@vxgxn @jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation Yes that is true.

@vxgxn @jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation 是的，这是真的。

@vxgxn @jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation Good point. Surgical with taped sides and nose probably very effective.

@vxgxn @jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation 好点。带有胶带的侧面和鼻子的手术可能非常有效。

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation Especially when many of the people who ended up back in the white house in January 2021 worked on this in 2008.

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation 尤其是当许多在 2021 年 1 月最终回到白宫的人在 2008 年为此工作时。

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation I pointed it out in 2020, just in case EVERYONE else in the entire world forgot (of course that didn't happen). Would have been plenty of time to bring it back.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation 我在 2020 年指出了这一点，以防万一全世界的其他人都忘记了（当然这没有发生）。本来有足够的时间把它带回来。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation Aura was authorized by FDA and sold for use by the general public in 2008. What happened in 12 years that made people stupid?
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation Aura 2008 年获得 FDA 授权并出售给大众使用。12 年发生了什么让人傻眼的事情？
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation I mean not only is it stupid but there is published evidence to the contrary. It's professional malpractice to be saying it.

@jklmd123 @FinchTH @exsibilation 我的意思是它不仅愚蠢，而且有相反的证据发表。说这话是职业失职。

@exsibilation @FinchTH Surgical with poor fit may be worse than cloth (cloth is often stretchy, so kind of self-fits).

@exsibilation @FinchTH Surgical 不合身可能比布更差（布通常有弹性，所以有点适合自己）。

@exsibilation @FinchTH CDC tested cloth at 71% for BOTH in and out (under arguably better than real world conditions). So out can't be much more than 30%. I think their modeling assumption was 40% for source control, and i think that's likely generous in reality (given often very poor fit)

@exsibilation @FinchTH CDC 测试布的进出率为 71%（可以说比现实世界的条件更好）。所以out不能超过30%。我认为他们的建模假设是 40% 用于源代码控制，我认为这在现实中可能是慷慨的（考虑到通常非常不合适）