@tab0612 @JReinerMD @POTUS @WHCOVIDResponse Yes and just before SOTU was when CDC released its fake soothing map and relaxed masking guidance, so clearly related.
However, it's interesting to note that the same game was afoot before the memo.

@tab0612 @JReinerMD @POTUS @WHCOVIDResponse 是的，就在 SOTU 之前，CDC 发布了虚假的舒缓地图和放松的掩蔽指南，如此明显相关。
然而，有趣的是，在备忘录发布之前，同样的游戏也在进行中。

@midnucas @JReinerMD That's the right answer. Vast majority would.

@midnucas @JReinerMD 这是正确的答案。绝大多数会。

@tab0612 @JReinerMD This is likely something that happened but it isn't really a good answer to this question about January when the memo is from February.

@tab0612 @JReinerMD 这可能是发生的事情，但当备忘录从二月开始时，它并不是一个关于一月的问题的好答案。

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois Not particularly. They're likely similar in kind, different in various details (some more important than others).

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois 不是特别好。它们可能在种类上相似，在各种细节上不同（有些比其他更重要）。

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois Why bother with healthcare then? It's really the same thing.

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois 那为什么还要麻烦医疗保健呢？这真的是一回事。

@CarlvKeirsbilck @CathNoakes @i_petersen @BallouxFrancois I'm shocked that 10% are at such an unbelievably substandard level. 10% is a small number, but not that small, like finding the occasional single facility with a defective system. 10% is enough to be considered systemic. It's atrocious.

@CarlvKeirsbilck @CathNoakes @i_petersen @BallouxFrancois 我很震惊 10% 的人处于如此令人难以置信的低标准水平。 10% 是一个很小的数字，但不是那么小，比如偶尔会发现系统有缺陷的单一设施。 10% 足以被认为是系统性的。太残暴了。

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois Of course I understand the differences. Not really necessary to be patronizing.
The broader point is that susceptibility and spread is context and society dependent. That's true even for some airborne, eg. TB.

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois 我当然理解这些差异。没有必要光顾。
更广泛的观点是易感性和传播取决于背景和社会。即使对于某些空降人员也是如此，例如。结核病。

@CarlvKeirsbilck @CathNoakes @i_petersen @BallouxFrancois That's amazing.

@CarlvKeirsbilck @CathNoakes @i_petersen @BallouxFrancois 这太棒了。

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois I'd add a lot more than just health care. Transit, essential retail, schools, at least some workplaces, etc.
That lets vulnerable people reduce their own burden without while societal levels may remain high for those who don't restrict activities.

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois 我要补充的不仅仅是医疗保健。交通、基本零售、学校、至少一些工作场所等。
这可以让弱势群体减轻自己的负担，而对于那些不限制活动的人来说，社会水平可能仍然很高。

@elizavetaka @Globalbiosec @CleanSpaceMasks Company might lend you one or even give you one for that. Can't hurt to ask.

@elizavetaka @Globalbiosec @CleanSpaceMasks 公司可能会借给你一个，甚至给你一个。不忍心问。

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois That's not the case for many infectious diseases which are environmentally controlled, eg. food-borne, water-borne, rabies, etc. Lots of susceptible people around (often all) but they still usually don't spread as long as society functions well enough to maintain controls.

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois 对于许多环境控制的传染病而言，情况并非如此，例如。食源性、水源性、狂犬病等。周围有很多易感人群（通常是所有人），但只要社会运转良好以维持控制，它们通常仍不会传播。

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois That's an important question but not the only one. There are people who would like to (or have no choice to) particulate in at least some aspects of society while being exposed to less transmission. Clean air at least in a number of essential facilities would facilitate this.

@i_petersen @CathNoakes @BallouxFrancois 这是一个重要的问题，但不是唯一的问题。有些人希望（或别无选择）至少在社会的某些方面出现微粒，同时减少传播。至少在一些基本设施中的清洁空气将有助于实现这一目标。

@Kev19081874 @Globalbiosec @CleanSpaceMasks Except for cost, yes.

@Kev19081874 @Globalbiosec @CleanSpaceMasks 除了成本，是的。

@elizavetaka @Globalbiosec @CleanSpaceMasks $3000 and it can be yours (not sure if there are export/import issues).

@elizavetaka @Globalbiosec @CleanSpaceMasks 3000 美元，它可以是你的（不确定是否存在出口/进口问题）。

@DrPieterPeach @farid__jalali He conflates sterilizing with disinfecting with stopping transmission. Deliberate or not, I don't know, but either way it is misleading.

@DrPieterPeach @farid__jalali 他将消毒与停止传播混为一谈。故意与否，我不知道，但无论哪种方式都是误导性的。

@tsarrast @BarrySilbert I don't know what he really believes in, can only go based on actions and apparent incentives. Actions consistent with pillage as far as I can tell.

@tsarrast @BarrySilbert 我不知道他真正相信什么，只能基于行动和明显的激励。据我所知，与掠夺一致的行动。

@RickWhist @mehdirhasan @KeepItBlueDems Democrats have passed multiple bills on a party line vote which could have included covid funding. They chose not to. Why? In February, Biden's covid coordinator rebuffed congressional leaders inquiries about funding, claimed to have all the funding they need. Why?

@RickWhist @mehdirhasan @KeepItBlueDems 民主党人已经通过了多项关于党派投票的法案，其中可能包括共同资助。他们选择不这样做。为什么？ 2 月，拜登的 covid 协调员拒绝了国会领导人关于资金的询问，声称拥有他们需要的所有资金。为什么？

@ShellyFriedland @mehdirhasan 1. Highest US flu deaths in the past 10 years is 52,000 (2018).
2. This 400/day was during the summer, when flu deaths are ~0/day. Covid deaths were much higher than 400/day last winter and may well be higher next winter.

@ShellyFriedland @mehdirhasan 1. 过去 10 年美国流感死亡人数最高的是 52,000 人（2018 年）。
2. 这 400 人/天是在夏季，当时流感死亡人数约为 0 人/天。去年冬天 Covid 死亡人数远高于每天 400 人，明年冬天可能会更高。

@KMSilverTweets @VPS_Reports @splcenter You can complain to both. Hilton has an interest in protecting its brand and there are certainly provisions in the franchise agreement accordingly.

@KMSilverTweets @VPS_Reports @splcenter 你可以向两者投诉。希尔顿有兴趣保护其品牌，特许经营协议中肯定有相应的规定。

@tsarrast @BarrySilbert What's his incentive? As long as the funds are captive, he can 2% fee the billions all the way down to zero.

@tsarrast @BarrySilbert 他的动机是什么？只要资金被俘虏，他就可以将数十亿美元的 2% 费用一直降至零。