@AltenbergLee @dgurdasani1 Right, and combinations have non-numerical interactions too. Like reduced occupancy or people staying home meant contact tracing more feasible and more effective because contact numbers lower.
@AltenbergLee @dgurdasani1 对，组合也有非数字交互。就像入住人数减少或人们待在家里一样，接触者追踪更可行、更有效，因为联系电话更少。
@VirginiaBuysse @dgurdasani1 Nobody is locking down forever in China either. It's mostly masks, mass testing, and border quarantine. When these fail there are localized lockdowns but they mostly don't fail. Few in China are "locked down" right now and numbers stay low.
@VirginiaBuysse @dgurdasani1 在中国也没有人永远封锁。主要是口罩、大规模检测和边境检疫。当这些失败时，会出现局部锁定，但它们大多不会失败。在中国，目前很少有人被“封锁”，而且人数一直很低。
@tomtanya84 @bryan_kirschner Not really buying that. 0.1 ACH is 10 hours to change the air. Even if it moved perfectly parallel, people move around and will inhale exhaled air at some point. It's true that specific air flow patterns matter not just average ACH.
@tomtanya84 @bryan_kirschner 不是真的买那个。 0.1 ACH 换气需要 10 小时。即使它完全平行移动，人们也会四处移动，并会在某个时刻吸入呼出的空气。确实，特定的气流模式不仅仅影响平均 ACH。
@CamiloGuezRodri @lithohedron @nailatrahman Taiwan and New Zealand early responses were completely different. Taiwan didn't really lockdown at all unless you consider border control and masks to be lockdowns.
@CamiloGuezRodri @lithohedron @nailatrahman 台湾和新西兰的早期反应完全不同。除非您将边境管制和口罩视为封锁，否则台湾根本没有真正封锁。
@GainOfDystopia @LazarusLong13 @SteverRobbins Not sure your point here. Within reason it doesn't even matter much what exact filter you use for a device like this. The 3M ones are pretty good though, in terms of airflow, filtration and cost (especially if bought on sale).
@GainOfDystopia @LazarusLong13 @SteverRobbins 不确定你的意思。在合理的范围内，您对这样的设备使用什么确切的过滤器并不重要。不过，在气流、过滤和成本方面（尤其是在打折时购买的），3M 的都相当不错。
@SteverRobbins @LazarusLong13 It's both. They wouldn't put their name on it if they didn't have high confidence and thought it could turn out not to work and backfire. They'd just shut up and sell filters.
@SteverRobbins @LazarusLong13 两者兼而有之。如果他们没有高度的信心，并且认为这可能行不通并且适得其反，他们就不会把他们的名字放在上面。他们只是闭嘴并出售过滤器。
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon Sea level has been rising for decades. Yes it likely is due to climate change, but it's not something you can pin on DeSantis himself. It happened before he was in office and would still be happening with a different governor.
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon 海平面几十年来一直在上升。是的，这很可能是由于气候变化造成的，但这不是您可以将其归咎于德桑蒂斯本人的事情。它发生在他上任之前，并且仍然会发生在不同的州长身上。
@anthutton @BeamMeUpScotee @paulkrugman @JohnJHarwood Not necessarily employment to a large extent, if the demand is excess. If you can only build 100 cars, then lending people money at rock bottom rates to buy 200 cars only encourages them to bid up the price of the same 100 cars. Still 100 auto workers.
@anthutton @BeamMeUpScotee @paulkrugman @JohnJHarwood 如果需求过剩，在很大程度上不一定是就业。如果您只能制造 100 辆汽车，那么以最低利率借钱购买 200 辆汽车只会鼓励他们抬高同样 100 辆汽车的价格。还有100名汽车工人。
@BeamMeUpScotee @paulkrugman @JohnJHarwood To reduce demand. Consider, for example, cars. Supply chains mean fewer cars being built, so why lend people money at rock bottom rates to buy more cars. Only serves to force up prices of cars (i.e. inflation).
@BeamMeUpScotee @paulkrugman @JohnJHarwood 减少需求。例如，考虑汽车。供应链意味着更少的汽车被制造出来，所以为什么要以最低的利率借钱来购买更多的汽车。只会迫使汽车价格上涨（即通货膨胀）。
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon Sea level rise is a factor too. Sea levels have risen by a bit, but storm surges are MUCH bigger than that. So it's additive. Huge storm surges without sea level rise are only a bit less bad.
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon 海平面上升也是一个因素。海平面上升了一点，但风暴潮比这要大得多。所以是加分项。没有海平面上升的巨大风暴潮只是不那么糟糕。
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon Yes, but that's probably not the major issue here. For example, consider this article. 10% increase in rain is BAD. It means a lot more flooding and damage. But 90% as much rain is BAD too. Building in hurricane zone is always going to be risky.
https://phys.org/news/2022-09-...
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon 是的，但这可能不是这里的主要问题。例如，考虑这篇文章。降雨量增加 10% 是不好的。这意味着更多的洪水和破坏。但是 90% 的降雨也很糟糕。在飓风区建造总是有风险的。
https://phys.org/news/2022-09-。 ..
@MaryDoodleDixon @DcrInYYC @TRyanGregory He's not a real practitioner. He has an MD degree but has never had a medical license or treated patients, and he teaches economics, not medicine, at a medical school.
@MaryDoodleDixon @DcrInYYC @TRyanGregory 他不是真正的从业者。他拥有医学博士学位，但从未获得过医疗执照或治疗过患者，他在一所医学院教授经济学，而不是医学。
@WXH19721 @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon That's true, but what I'm pointing out is that even if Florida had AOC as governor and went all in on climate change, it would still be getting hit with large and enormously expensive hurricanes. It's an expensive place to live.
@WXH19721 @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon 这是真的，但我要指出的是，即使佛罗里达州有 AOC 作为州长并全力应对气候变化，它仍然会受到大规模且极其昂贵的飓风的袭击。这是一个昂贵的居住地。
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon As for why, it is complicated. Climate change probably plays a role, but Florida has always been hit by hurricanes. In the past it was less populated/built up. A few decades of low hurricane impact during rapid development may have created a false impression of relative safety.
@DemsKeys @DWUhlfelderLaw @RemoveRon 至于为什么，这很复杂。气候变化可能发挥了作用，但佛罗里达州一直受到飓风的袭击。在过去，它的人口/建筑较少。在快速发展期间几十年的低飓风影响可能会造成相对安全的错误印象。