@BenK78457034 @HandNF @epi_dude This doesn't tell you anything whatsoever about the asymptomatic rate, only that most (as in 97%) aren't being counted. Plenty of symptomatic people still don't test at all or take self tests and never report it.

@BenK78457034@HandNF@epi\u dude这并没有告诉你任何关于无症状率的信息，只是大多数（97%）没有被计算在内。许多有症状的人仍然根本不进行测试，或者进行自我测试，从不报告。

@Wintertravel80 @BobLu6 @epi_dude This study was telling you that cases were undercounted by 31 times. With that degree of inaccuracy there is no reason to expect official case counts to be even directionally accurate most of the time.

@Wintertravel80@BobLu6@epi\u dude这项研究告诉你，病例数量少了31倍。由于这种程度的不准确，没有理由期望官方案件统计在大多数情况下甚至在方向上都是准确的。

@Incindery1 31 times!

@总共31次！

@OG97921596 @TheSkylineTrail @PeteUK7 @BernieDogs4 @Equanimity737 @kprather88 @Ride4Truth Unusual to have 30 people packed in one small room in a workplace, but does happen.

@OG97921596@TheSkylineTrail@PeteUK7@BernieDogs4@equianity737@kprather88@Ride4Truth在一个工作场所的一个小房间里挤着30个人是很不寻常的，但确实发生了。

@wsbgnl WTF?
How do you not fact check that deaths have been rising since mid May?

@wsbgnl WTF？
你怎么不去核实自5月中旬以来死亡人数一直在上升的事实呢？

@sammy4723 @danaparish Still doubling every three days. I just checked.

@sammy4723@danaparish仍然每三天翻一番。我刚检查过。

@danaparish "Reopening"

@danaparish“重新开放”

@Marco_Piani @HMDatabase Canada 3 years older median age too.

@马尔科·皮亚尼（Marco\u Piani@HMDatabase Canada）也比平均年龄大3岁。

@pasdedeuxproj @yaneerbaryam (In addition to the air cleaner, not instead.)

@Pasdedeeuxproj@yaneerbaryam（除了空气滤清器之外，而不是。）

@pasdedeuxproj @yaneerbaryam Well, still nothing is quite 100%, but if you know there is a mouse in there, it probably isn't a bad idea. Masking (w/good mask) does at least filter specifically the air you are breathing in. Of course, try to get rid of the mouse/keep them out, etc.

@Pasdedeeuxproj@yaneerbaryam嗯，仍然没有什么是百分之百的，但如果你知道那里有一只老鼠，这可能不是个坏主意。掩蔽（带良好的面罩）至少能过滤你吸入的空气。当然，试着摆脱老鼠/把它们挡在外面，等等。

@Roam85Gaming @caveman626 @WandaRoe @RonFilipkowski I think it means marriage-like so if living together but not legally married that would still count.

@Roam85Gaming@caveman626@WandaRoe@RonFilipkowski我认为这意味着婚姻，如果生活在一起但没有合法结婚，这仍然很重要。

@pasdedeuxproj @yaneerbaryam Air cleaner type filtration won't 'protect' you from anything. It's mitigation (in a given situation fewer people would become infected, or alternately, time to infection would increase), but there is no way to avoid breathing some contaminated air before it gets filtered.

@Pasdedeeuxproj@yaneerbaryam空气滤清器类型的过滤不会“保护”你免受任何伤害。这是一种缓解措施（在特定情况下，感染人数会减少，或者感染时间会延长），但在空气被过滤之前，无法避免呼吸一些受污染的空气。

@jasonlk At $20 million you need a 1/50 hit rate to break even ignoring time value. The difference between 1/40, or even 1/20, and 1/60 is extremely hard to assess. They are all very much most likely NGMI.

@jasonlk在2000万美元时，你需要1/50的命中率来实现收支平衡，忽略时间价值。1/40，甚至1/20，和1/60之间的差异非常难以评估。他们都很可能是NGMI。

@PlasticFull @CleanAirStars https://cowaymega.com/products...

@塑料填充@CleanAirStarshttps://cowaymega.com/products...

@PlasticFull @CleanAirStars Not sure what is 'g3' but I was thinking of something that would just catch dust and should add minimal resistance unless dirty (but since on the outside would be visible). Are you familiar with the plastic dust screens on the Coway boxes? Something like that.

@PlasticFull@CleanAirStars不确定什么是“g3”，但我在想一种只会捕捉灰尘的东西，除非脏了，否则应该增加最小的阻力（但因为外面可以看到）。你熟悉Coway盒子上的塑料防尘网吗？像这样的。

@PlasticFull @CleanAirStars I was wondering the same thing about improvised (C-R type) devices. On the surface it would seem easy to wrap or cover with a cloth or solid screen dust catcher which could easily be vacuumed or washed. Never got a good recommendation on specific material.

@PlasticFull@CleanAirStars我对简易（C-R型）设备也有同样的想法。表面上，似乎很容易用布或实心滤网除尘器包裹或覆盖，这些除尘器很容易被吸尘或清洗。从未得到关于特定材料的好建议。

@danaparish @alexmeshkin Imagine if the nearly the entire profession of medicine and science didn't stay silent (half of them probably trying to book their own appearances) as their colleagues lie on TV.

@danaparish@alexmeshkin想象一下，如果几乎整个医学和科学行业都没有在他们的同事在电视上撒谎时保持沉默（他们中的一半人可能试图预订自己的出场时间）。

@nberlat It's not even remotely passable, as you know.

@正如你所知，这一点都不能通过。

@robwiss I think that's a better design, since you have negative pressure holding the filter against the seal. Just friction is at the mercy of the foam not leaking or loosening up, or the filters just collapsing inward at some point, perhaps due to vibration or thermal expansion.

@robwiss我认为这是一个更好的设计，因为你有负压保持过滤器紧靠密封。摩擦取决于泡沫是否泄漏或松动，或者过滤器是否在某个点向内塌陷，可能是由于振动或热膨胀。

@robwiss In this picture I can see a lip that holds the filter when pushed in (suction should hold it there). That wasn't apparent in the drawings.

@Robwis在这张图片中，我可以看到一个唇板，当推入过滤器时，唇板会固定住过滤器（吸力会将其固定在那里）。这在图纸中并不明显。