@APazyryk @justinkeister5 @LazarusLong13 @tmprowell I thought so but people might not interpret it that way, as opposed to "symptoms" like shortness of breath, brain fog, and such,

@APazyryk@justinkeister5@LazarusLong13@tmprowell我也这么认为，但人们可能不会这样理解，而不是像呼吸短促、脑雾等“症状”，

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites That's probably the economy. Downturn was global but given much weaker safety net, the impact on health would be greater in the US. I think the average bent down (hard to see but I think so), but US bent down more.

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites这可能是经济问题。经济衰退是全球性的，但鉴于安全网要弱得多，美国对健康的影响将更大。我认为平均水平下降了（很难看到，但我认为是这样），但美国下降了更多。

@AbundantLandUse @FreitasABR Just about everywhere. Even if not between units then from common areas into the units.

@几乎所有地方都有丰富的法语。即使不在单元之间，也要从公共区域进入单元。

@AbundantLandUse @FreitasABR Many apartments have air infiltration between units.

@许多公寓单元之间有空气渗透。

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites I'd say that chart suggests it depends where you live!

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites我想这张图表表明这取决于你住在哪里！

@maskupmelb It can be the exact same material but it could also be 'binning'. If a batch comes out of manufacturing and fails the more stringent test you can use that batch for the lesser product. So it may be that SOME samples of the lesser product pass the higher test but not all.

@maskupmelb它可以是完全相同的材料，但也可以是“装箱”。如果一批产品出厂时未通过更严格的测试，则可以将该批产品用于较小的产品。因此，可能是一些较小产品的样品通过了较高的测试，但并非全部通过。

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites Demand for some things, yes, but when people die there is less demand for other things.

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites对一些东西的需求是的，但当人们死后，对其他东西的需求就会减少。

@erichzannmovie @CT_Bergstrom Such a spacecraft would likely only have two axes (e.g. cylinder or ring shape) but if it were some strange design with three axes then it would.

@erichzannmovie@CT\u Bergstrom这样的航天器可能只有两个轴（例如圆柱体或环形），但如果它是一个奇怪的三轴设计，那么它就会。

@CT_Bergstrom LOL. Nice troll getting people to smash their phones.

@CT_Bergstrom 哈哈。漂亮的巨魔让人们砸手机。

@RVAwonk @sandibachom Okay sure, if your thinking is the fewer guns sold the better and don't care about anything else, I can see your argument. Otherwise, why should rich people be able to get a gun whenever they want and people who need credit to afford one not?

@好的，如果你的想法是枪卖的越少越好，而不关心其他任何事情，我可以理解你的论点。否则，为什么有钱人可以随时得到枪，而那些需要信贷却买不起枪的人呢？

@michaelmina_lab The rebounding wasn't seen in the trial, I think. So clearly the effects are different. How can we be confident about the scope of that difference?

@迈克尔·米纳（michaelmina\u lab）我想在审判中没有看到篮板。很明显，效果是不同的。我们如何才能对这种差异的范围有信心？

@michaelmina_lab Yes, okay, but how do we know that has the desired effect in terms of outcomes? It certainly seems a stretch to say with any sort of confidence that it has the same effect (with same magnitude) that it did with a different virus in a different population.

@michaelmina\u实验室是的，好吧，但我们如何知道这在结果方面有预期的效果？毫无疑问，如果有信心地说，它具有与在不同人群中使用不同病毒相同的效果（具有相同的程度），这似乎有些牵强。

@MikeM33960785 @SueSueCurious Many/most yes. But what you're seeing at Olive Garden or any of these places is the subset of people who have. The others aren't visible.

@MikeM33960785@suesuequitious许多/大多数是。但你在橄榄园或任何这些地方看到的都是那些拥有的人的子集。其他人看不见。

@ValPMB @SueSueCurious No chance.

@ValPMB@Suesuequitious没有机会。

@SueSueCurious @myrabatchelder For the breadsticks.

@SuesueGuicious@MyraBatcheld找面包条。

@mikejohansenmd BA.1 was 3-4 months ago, six month ago from original designation as a VoC. Now it is in some sense obsolete. I have a hard time seeing vaccine update and production keeping up with this treadmill regardless of pathways.

@mikejohansenmd文学士。1是3-4个月前，6个月前从最初的指定为挥发性有机化合物。现在它在某种意义上已经过时了。我很难看到疫苗的更新和生产跟上这台跑步机的步伐，无论其途径如何。

@loisrp @lisa_iannattone Most of those highly educated people are just lying.

@loisrp@lisa\u iannattone大多数受过高等教育的人都在撒谎。

@Dr_M_Davis @mgubrud @MichaelGemar I don't think people fully appreciate how much launch costs are coming down. Everything that was deemed non-feasible because it cost too much to launch needs to be reassessed. Some of it still will be, some won't.

@M\u Davis博士@mgubrud@MichaelGemar我认为人们并没有完全意识到发射成本下降了多少。因为发射成本太高而被认为不可行的一切都需要重新评估。有些仍然会，有些不会。

@twolvesfan1981 @butlerofdogs @elonmusk Yeah some places I could definitely see that

@twolvesfan1981@butlerofdogs@elonmusk是的，有些地方我肯定能看到

@DPalmerReport @michaelmina_lab Asserting this does not make it so. I've seen zero studies supporting it. Maybe they're out there, I don't know.

@DPalmerReport@michaelmina\u实验室断言这并不是事实。我没有看到任何支持它的研究。也许他们在外面，我不知道。