@LazarusLong13 @JHowardBrainMD It's not tough at all if you are an honest scientist at all. Be extremely skeptical (even scared) of anyone who shows difficulty.

@LazarusLong13@JHowardBrainMD如果你是一个诚实的科学家，这一点都不难。对任何表现出困难的人都要极度怀疑（甚至害怕）。

@mgubrud @MichaelGemar @Dr_M_Davis It doesn't say anything about feasibility of space based solar but it does say that in-space labor being a high fraction of the cost is extremely unlikely. As you say, space-based hardware would likely be more expensive and therefore labor costs relatively LOWER.

@mgubrud@MichaelGemar@Dr\u M\u Davis它没有说任何关于太空太阳能的可行性，但它确实说，在太空中，劳动力占成本的比例很高是不可能的。正如你所说，天基硬件可能会更贵，因此劳动力成本相对较低。

@MichaelGemar @Dr_M_Davis @mgubrud Considering solar energy as mentioned in this thread, equipment costs are the largest portion by far (and space-based would certainly be designed for even lower in-place labor costs). Different for different types of projects, of course.
https://www.researchgate.net/f...

@MichaelGemar@Dr\u M\u Davis@mgubrud考虑到本帖中提到的太阳能，设备成本是迄今为止最大的部分（而天基的设计肯定会降低现场劳动力成本）。当然，不同类型的项目会有所不同。
https://www.researchgate.net/f...

@j109203 @EnemyInAState The article assumes infected once per year, the tweet (and other estimates) said twice per year, so ^6 not ^3. 10% and 5% are low estimates, per some studies that are more recent than this thread. CDC now says potentially 20%
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

@j109203@EnemyInAState这篇文章假设每年感染一次，推特（和其他估计）说每年两次，所以不是。根据一些比这条线索更新的研究，10%和5%的估计值较低。CDC现在表示可能有20%
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

@MothraStewart3 @5dconsciousness @DrTomFrieden Nobody claimed vaccines don't work. But it's a question of degree. Post-vaccine, not all cases are mild (in fact, increasingly, many vaccinated people die), and even in 2020 with no vaccines whatsoever, many cases were mild (or even asymptomatic).

@没有人声称疫苗无效。但这是一个学位问题。接种疫苗后，并非所有病例都是轻度的（事实上，越来越多的接种疫苗的人死亡），即使在2020年没有任何疫苗，许多病例也是轻度的（甚至没有症状）。

@ReedRothchild12 @Handsof04879436 @DrTomFrieden Certainly not. Do you know what, for example, "acute myocardial infarction" means?
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum... https://t.co/Bq1Mxq76jG

@ReedRothchild12@Handsof04879436@DrTomFrieden当然不是。你知道“急性心肌梗死”是什么意思吗？
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum... https://t.co/Bq1Mxq76jG

@MothraStewart3 @5dconsciousness @DrTomFrieden I doubt you can find one in twelve celebrities who talk about having a rough time after being vaxed. It's all carefully scripted: thankful for being vaxed, mild symptoms, sometimes taking paxlovid (often with lack of clarity as to why, other than being rich with access to candy).

@MothraStewart3@5dConcensity@DrTomFrieden我怀疑你能找到十二分之一的名人谈论过被强奸后的痛苦时光。这一切都是经过精心编写的：感谢被人抽迷糊，症状轻微，有时服用paxlovid（通常不清楚原因，除了能吃到糖果之外）。

@mgubrud @Dr_M_Davis @MichaelGemar I'm sure it's awful but the trend over time is a huge improvement.

@mgubrud@Dr\M\u Davis@MichaelGemar我相信这很糟糕，但随着时间的推移，趋势是一个巨大的进步。

@itosettiMD_MBA Likely automated.

@itosettiMD\u MBA可能是自动化的。

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites https://www.vox.com/science-an...

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWriteshttps://www.vox.com/science-an...

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites Pretty simple. Some things I've seen data on, some I haven't.

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites非常简单。有些事情我看到了数据，有些我没有。

@AbundantLandUse @FreitasABR I'm not disagreeing with you at all. Must be a misunderstanding.

@我一点也不反对你。一定是误会了。

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites I have no idea. Why only the US though?

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites我不知道。为什么只有美国？

@maskupmelb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@遮罩模具https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites I'm pretty sure that many health outcomes in the US are very unequal. For the most privileged they're not much worse than the rest of the developed world, for the less privileged they are. That points toward safety net policies and general inequity.

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites我敢肯定，美国的许多健康结果是非常不平等的。对于最有特权的人来说，他们并不比其他发达国家差多少，因为他们的特权较低。这就指向了安全网政策和普遍的不平等。

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites It's probably a factor.

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites这可能是一个因素。

@AbundantLandUse @FreitasABR During part of the pandemic period, I have lived in a city/apartment. I had a big air cleaner by the front door and more throughout the unit. Not clear whether that made any difference, but never did get covid.

@AbundantLandUse@FreitasABR在大流行期间，我住在一个城市/公寓里。我在前门有一个很大的空气滤清器，整个单元都有更多的空气滤清器。不清楚这是否有什么不同，但从未感染过新冠病毒。

@AbundantLandUse @FreitasABR If you're only relying on protection when you go out, you're potentially more exposed in your own apartment. It may be less likely than direct close contact, but it will happen.

@如果你外出时只依赖保护，那么你在自己的公寓里可能会暴露得更多。这可能比直接密切接触的可能性小，但它会发生。

@AbundantLandUse @FreitasABR What makes you think air wouldn't come into a unit from hallways in 2001? The only way that wouldn't happen would be deliberate positive pressure in each unit which I doubt exists just about anywhere in the world. Usually it's the opposite.

@2001年，是什么让你认为空气不会从走廊进入一个单元？唯一不会发生这种情况的方法是在每个单元中故意施加积极压力，我怀疑这种压力在世界任何地方都存在。通常情况恰恰相反。

@SixandLaura @denise_dewald @Theresa_Chapple @StephTaitWrites Here's an article that compares some of it.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/w...

@SixandLaura@denise\u dewald@Theresa\u Chapple@StephTaitWrites这里有一篇文章比较了其中的一些。
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/w...