Aeon 的最新消息

@danaparish I'm less and less confident about even distance as the variants get more infectious. Today I walked by an office entrance as people were leaving. Many of the workers were wearing perfume (who does that in an office?). I could smell the different scents even at a distance.

@danaparish我对距离越来越没有信心,因为变异病毒的传染性越来越强。今天,当人们离开时,我走过一个办公室入口。许多工人都在喷香水(谁在办公室里喷的?)。即使在远处,我也能闻到不同的气味。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@cookiebandit Well, one kid could get it from another kid too.

@CookieBindit嗯,一个孩子也可以从另一个孩子那里得到它。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @MikeMitchNH @peternsunnyvale @Noahpinion And yet, Democrats, much less NYC+CA, don't come even CLOSE to dominating the House, they have a narrow majority which comes and goes. And, no, this isn't because of WY being overrepresented, of course, even though it is as a matter of statistical curiosity.

@JJD\U Aqua@MikeMitchNH@peternsunnyvale@Noahpinion,然而,民主党人,更不用说纽约州+加州,甚至还没有接近于主宰众议院,他们的得票率很低。当然,这并不是因为WY的比例过高,尽管这是一个统计上的好奇问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MikeMitchNH @peternsunnyvale @JJD_Aqua @Noahpinion Back when Democrats did dominate the house for a few decades, that included a large contingent of southern democrats. The governing coalition was still very geographically diverse, nothing like NYC+CA.

@MikeMitchNH@peternsunnyvale@JJD\u Aqua@Noahpinion回顾了民主党在众议院统治了几十年的历史,其中包括一大批南方民主党人。执政联盟在地理位置上仍然非常多样化,与纽约+加州截然不同。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MikeMitchNH @peternsunnyvale @JJD_Aqua @Noahpinion That's unfair. He said very clearly the the idea was to disperse power geographically. That's understandable, but the solution is misguided and unnecessary. NYC/California (which don't even vote as blocs either) don't even remotely dominate the House in practice.

@MikeMitchNH@peternsunnyvale@JJD\u Aqua@Noahpinion这太不公平了。他说得很清楚,这个想法是为了在地理上分散权力。这是可以理解的,但解决方案是错误的,没有必要的。纽约州/加利福尼亚州(甚至不作为集团投票)在实践中甚至都没有在众议院占据绝对主导地位。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RayRedacted It's odd that chart compares cigarettes per person with lung cancer for men only, but I guess it doesn't make much difference.

@这张图表只对男性进行了人均吸烟和肺癌的比较,这很奇怪,但我想这没什么区别。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@stevedemaio @EricTopol 5 days is the CDC guidance with or without meds, so thank them. Supposed to wear a mask until day 10.

@stevedemaio@EricTopol 5天是CDC的指南,无论是否有药物,所以感谢他们。应该戴口罩直到第10天。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion I do, and I think you will too in time. We can only wait to find out.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion我知道,我想你也会及时知道的。我们只能等着弄清楚。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion It may be that it is too large, yes. I don't agree with the false dichotomy that it's either the status quo or NYC and California run everything. You can have broad influence in numerous ways.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion可能是因为它太大了,是的。我不同意那种错误的二分法,即要么维持现状,要么由纽约和加利福尼亚掌管一切。你可以在许多方面产生广泛的影响。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion Also cold war itself perhaps. Without a clear common enemy, US tears itself apart.

@JJD\U Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion或许也包括冷战本身。如果没有一个明确的共同敌人,美国就会四分五裂。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion I think the US is inherently unstable and dysfunctional. The answer to Noah's question is likely a temporary honeymoon period of stability post-wars.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion我认为美国天生就不稳定,功能失调。诺亚问题的答案可能是战后暂时的蜜月稳定期。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion I've lived in several countries (roughly a dozen without counting, maybe more), though not Syria. I understand political, demographic, and economic concentration and dynamics.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion我在几个国家生活过(大约有十几个,不算在内,可能更多),但叙利亚没有。我了解政治、人口和经济的集中度和动态。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion I doubt you can usefully usefully generalize by comparing any two countries, at least in such a broadly superficial way. Different history, population, geography, etc.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion我怀疑你可以通过比较任何两个国家来有效地概括,至少是以这样一种广泛而肤浅的方式。不同的历史、人口、地理等。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@peternsunnyvale @JJD_Aqua @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion In his defense, there are different forms of inequity and he's saying that redistribution to lower pop, less affluent regions actually reduces inequity. I don't agree about separatism though, I strongly suspect it is pro-separatism and self-destructive.

@peternsunnyvale@JJD\u Aqua@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion在他的辩护中,有不同形式的不平等,他说,向低流行、低富裕地区的再分配实际上减少了不平等。虽然我不同意分离主义,但我强烈怀疑它是支持分离主义和自我毁灭的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion Certainly failed once before, too.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion之前也失败过一次。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion At this point it looks like it might well be doing the opposite.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion在这一点上,它看起来很可能做相反的事情。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion There have been, what? 100 or so presidents and vice presidents. By pop, Wyoming should have zero. but it had one (Dick Cheney, VP). That's overrepresented, but not itself significant. "Over" doesn't mean ALL representation or influence w/low pop-state, just disproportionate.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion有什么?大约100名总裁和副总裁。根据流行音乐,怀俄明州应该是零。但它有一个(副总裁迪克·切尼)。这一比例过高,但其本身并不重要。“结束”并不意味着所有的代表性或影响力与低流行状态,只是不成比例。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion According to population it would be like 1 in 700, so we don't really know.

@JJD\U Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion根据人口,大约是700分之一,所以我们真的不知道。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion Sort of. Spending driven by gaining votes in Congress as opposed to serving the mission. That's not really redistributive per se, except according to votes.

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion排序。通过在国会获得选票而不是为使命服务而推动的开支。这本身并不是真正的再分配,除非根据选票。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JJD_Aqua @peternsunnyvale @MikeMitchNH @Noahpinion Yes. There's nothing offsetting it. Some small states like WY even have disproportionate influence in the House!

@JJD\u Aqua@peternsunnyvale@MikeMitchNH@Noahpinion是的。没有什么可以抵消它。一些像怀俄明州这样的小州甚至在众议院拥有不成比例的影响力!

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情