Explanation 5: we have social media now and social media rewards negativity.
(If true, I think this is unhealthy and we should just fight it head-on, but less sure *how* to do that)

解释5：我们现在有了社交媒体，社交媒体会奖励消极因素。
（如果是真的，我认为这是不健康的，我们应该迎头痛击，但不太确定如何做到这一点）

Explanation 4: today's culture is just in general more driven by fear of dystopia rather than excitement about positive visions, and so everyone's first question is now "will your thing create a dystopia?"
(If true, I think this is unhealthy and we should just fight it head-on)

解释4：今天的文化通常更多地是由对反乌托邦的恐惧而不是对积极愿景的兴奋所驱动，因此每个人现在的第一个问题是“你的东西会创造一个反乌托邦吗？”
（如果是真的，我认为这是不健康的，我们应该迎头痛击）

See also:
https://twitter.com/vgr/status...

另见：
https://twitter.com/vgr/status...

As Cory mentioned, crypto was at first just decentralization enthusiasts, but now there's also various types of "money people".
This is an inevitable part of becoming bigger. In non-financial movements too, various classes of normies and often soon grifters move in over time.

正如Cory所提到的，crypto起初只是分散化爱好者，但现在也有各种类型的“有钱人”。
这是变大不可避免的一部分。在非金融运动中，随着时间的推移，各种类型的正常人和往往很快就有诈骗者进入。

Explanation 3: idealistic small movements easily lose their idealism and become mixed in with other energies once they become big, and those other energies more easily lead to negative stuff.

解释3：理想主义的小运动很容易失去理想主义，一旦变大，就会与其他能量混合，而这些其他能量更容易导致消极的东西。

Also related is the "dense jungle" phenomenon I talk about here:
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
The internet naturally puts everything distance 1 away from everything else. This too makes live-and-let-live harder.

我在这里谈到的“密林”现象也与此相关：
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
互联网自然而然地使一切事物与其他事物相距甚远。这也让生活变得更加艰难。

One important factor is that all of those movements *got much bigger* in the last decade. When something is small, even if you don't like it, it's not a threat, so it's easy to live-and-let-live. When everything is big, more competition, so more incentive to point out problems.

一个重要因素是，在过去十年中，所有这些运动*都变得更大了*。当事情很小的时候，即使你不喜欢它，它也不是一种威胁，所以很容易活下去。当一切都很大的时候，竞争就越激烈，所以就越有动力指出问题。

But complaining about the phenomenon won't fix it. Need to understand it.

但抱怨这种现象并不能解决问题。需要理解它。

This all makes me feel very sad. My natural temperament has always been that I want to be part of all the good-guy teams and bring them together. But now many of these teams that I've grown up loving are attacking each other and considering each other harmful.

这一切让我感到非常难过。我天生的气质一直是，我想成为所有好人团队的一员，并将他们团结在一起。但现在，许多我从小就喜欢的球队都在互相攻击，认为对方是有害的。

Other examples of this:
* Maximalism in crypto
* Many libertarians turning against {democracy | immigration | cosmopolitan morality...}
* The rabidly anti-vegetable types
* The "woke vs rationalist" mini-internet-war last year
* The hostile responses here https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

这方面的其他示例：
*密码中的极大值论
*许多自由主义者反对{民主|移民|世界主义道德…}
*极端反蔬菜的类型
*去年的“觉醒vs理性主义”迷你互联网战争
*这里的敌对反应https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

See https://twitter.com/doctorow/s... for @doctorow's explanation of his views.
Cory's devcon speech has some specific concerns about financialization.
But it feels like there are deeper causes. The crypto vs tech-left divide is not the only divide; *all* the teams are divided.

看见https://twitter.com/doctorow/s...感谢@doctorow对其观点的解释。
科里的devcon演讲对金融化有一些具体的担忧。
但感觉有更深层次的原因。加密与技术之间的左分界并不是唯一的分界*所有的队伍都被分开了。

Today, we see @doctorow signing onto a letter advocating regulating crypto more harshly, which is upsetting and confusing a lot of crypto advocates because many looked up to his vision and saw themselves as fellow travelers.

今天，我们看到@doctorow在一封信上签名，主张更严厉地监管加密，这让许多加密倡导者感到不安和困惑，因为许多人都很尊重他的愿景，认为自己是同路人。

Many libertarians were excited about direct democracy.
PorcFest (big libertarian event) had lots of carnivore *and* vegan food.
Rick @Falkvinge bridged Bitcoin and the Pirate Party.
Lots of blockchain people and "open source community" people saw each other as natural allies.

许多自由主义者对直接民主感到兴奋。
豪猪节（大型自由主义活动）有很多食肉动物和素食食物。
Rick@Falkvinge为比特币和海盗党架起了桥梁。
许多区块链人员和“开源社区”人员将彼此视为天然盟友。

A big difference between the "new idealistic movement" scene 10-15 years ago vs today is that back then it felt possible to be on all the good-guy teams at the same time. Today, much more adversarial thinking and conflict.
I've been trying to understand.. where to from here?

10-15年前的“新理想主义运动”与今天的“新理想主义运动”相比，有一个很大的不同，那就是当时人们觉得可以同时加入所有的好人团队。今天，更多的是对抗性思维和冲突。
我一直在努力理解。。从这里到哪里？

@muneeb @nicksdjohnson (Not meant sarcastically or gotcha, just checking)
I do agree that all the pure-async-safe-BFT chains have a problem. But the fact that PoS has a larger design space is imo a strength not a weakness.

@muneeb@nicksdjohnson（不是指讽刺或抓住你，只是检查一下）
我同意所有纯异步安全BFT链都有问题。但PoS拥有更大的设计空间这一事实在我看来是一个优势而非劣势。

@muneeb @nicksdjohnson You understand that this is exactly why ethereum PoS has the fork choice and inactivity leaks, right?

@muneeb@nicksdjohnson您知道这正是以太坊PoS具有分叉选择和不活动泄漏的原因，对吗？

RT: "A rebellion against death is brewing." https://thereader.mitpress.mit...

RT：“对死亡的反抗正在酝酿。”https://thereader.mitpress.mit...

@NeerajKA Missing numbers are a good thing to have an eye out for, they often signify something misleading.
Similar to how when an article says "Most Americans support..." quite often by "most" it really means "54%"

@NeerajKA缺失的数字是一件值得注意的事情，它们往往意味着误导。
类似于一篇文章所说的“大多数美国人支持…”通常，“most”的真正含义是“54%”

@Nouriel Me: when you're building a car, make sure to add BOTH a seatbelt AND airbags. Two factor safety is better than one!
Nouriel: wow cars have so many buzzwords and things people have to worry about. Driving is NGMI.

@努里尔·梅：当你在造汽车时，一定要加上安全带和安全气囊。双因素安全比单因素安全好！
诺瑞尔：哇，汽车有很多流行语和人们必须担心的事情。驾驶是NGMI。

@WallfacerAG Like, do people really think that if EA ideology did not exist, the stereotypical "techbros" would be donating millions to Doctors Without Borders or engaging with social justice advocacy?

@像WallfacerAG一样，人们真的认为如果EA意识形态不存在，刻板的“techbros”会向医生无国界组织捐赠数百万美元，或者参与社会正义宣传吗？